Para 6.10.1 - Arbitration Appeals | KartavyaDesk
Original Rule Text
(iii) The Organisation should monitor the success rate of appealing against arbitration awards. There should be a clear delegation to empower officials to accept arbitration / court orders. A special board / committee may be set up to review the case before an appeal is filed against an order. Arbitration /court awards should not be routinely appealed without due application of mind on all facts and circumstances including realistic probability of success. The board / committee or other authority deciding on the matter shall clarify that it has considered both legal merits and the practical chances of success and after considering the cost of, and rising through, litigation / appeal / further litigation as the case may be, it is satisfied that such litigation / appeal / further litigation cost is likely to be financially beneficial compared to accepting the arbitration / court award. iv) Statistics have shown that in cases where the arbitration award is challenged, a large majority of cases are decided in favour of the contractor. In such cases, the amount becomes payable with the interest, at a rate which is often far higher than the government's cost of funds. This results in huge financial losses to the government. Hence, in aggregate, it is in public interest to take the risk of paying a substantial part of the award amount subject to the result of the litigation, even if in some rare cases of insolvency etc. recovery of the amount in case of success may become difficult. Instructions have been issued in this matter in the past, but have not been fully complied with. (v) The only circumstances in which such payment need not be made is where the contractor declines, or is unable, to provide the requisite bank guarantee and/or fails to open a escrow account as required. Persons responsible for not adhering to are liable to be held personally accountable for the additional interest arising, in the event of the final court order going against the procuring entity.
What This Means
The rule also addresses the common trend where contractors often win when arbitration awards are challenged. This leads to the government paying the original amount plus significant interest, which can be much higher than the government's borrowing costs. Therefore, the rule suggests that it's often better to pay a substantial portion of the award amount while pursuing litigation, unless the contractor refuses to provide a bank guarantee or open an escrow account. Officials who don't follow these guidelines may be held personally responsible for the extra interest if the final court decision goes against the government.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Key Points
- •Appeals against arbitration awards should not be routine; a thorough review is mandatory.
- •A board/committee should assess both legal merits and the practical chances of success before filing an appeal.
- •Consider the cost of litigation/appeal versus accepting the award; prioritize financial benefit to the government.
- •Paying a substantial part of the award amount during litigation is often more financially prudent.
- •Officials may be held personally accountable for additional interest if they don't adhere to these guidelines and the government loses the case.
Practical Example
Considering the low probability of success and the potential for increased costs, the committee recommends paying ₹4 crore to M/s Construction Ltd. while simultaneously pursuing a limited appeal on specific points. M/s Construction Ltd. provides the required bank guarantee. This approach minimizes the financial risk to the government, even if the appeal is ultimately unsuccessful. If Mr. Sharma had ignored this process and routinely appealed, and the appeal failed, he could be held accountable for the additional interest accrued.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the primary objective of Para 6.10.1?▼
Who is responsible for ensuring compliance with Para 6.10.1?▼
What factors should be considered before appealing an arbitration award?▼
What happens if an official fails to comply with Para 6.10.1 and the government loses the case?▼
What is an escrow account in the context of this rule?▼
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Test Your Knowledge
Question 1 of 3
According to Para 6.10.1 of the Works Manual, before filing an appeal against an arbitration award, what assessment must a special board/committee undertake?
Related Rules
Need help understanding this rule?
Ask Niti — your AI assistant for WORKS_MANUAL and other government rules