Para 5.7.7 - Fair Bidding | KartavyaDesk
Original Rule Text
5.8 Evaluation of Bids and Award of Contract - Risks and Mitigations Risk Mitigation prices being high, change of specifications, budget not being available, and so on. may be taken. Please also see the complaint mechanism. Sudden quantity reduction/ increase or splitting of quantity work at the time of award: Many organisations have provisions for change/ splitting in the bid quantity at the time of award. Some organisations vary quantity even without such provisions Bid conditions must specify a limit beyond which originally announced quantity/ scope cannot be reduced/ increased. If parallel contracts are envisaged, clear criteria for the splitting may be specified in the bid documents beforehand. Unwarranted negotiations: negotiations are called without justification. Sometimes a counter-offer is made to discourage lowest acceptable bidder. Normally, there should be no post-tender negotiations. In certain exceptional situations, for example, procurement of proprietary items, items with limited sources of supply, and items where there is suspicion of a cartel formation, negotiations may be held with L-1. In case of L-1 backing out, there should be re-tendering. Unwarranted delays in finalizing or varying the terms of preannounce contract agreement: even after the TC recommendations are accepted, signing of the contract is delayed on one pretext or the other. Although there is a standard contract form in the bid documents, the contract may be drafted in a fashion to favour or discourage the successful bidder. A target timeline of finalisation of procurement should be laid down. Delays and reasons thereof should be brought out before the CA on the file at the time of TC’s acceptance or contract signing. The contract should be strictly as per the bid conditions and accepted offer.
What This Means
Para 5.7.7 of the Works Manual focuses on preventing unfair practices during the bid evaluation and contract awarding process. It's all about ensuring transparency and fairness so that the government gets the best value for its money. This rule aims to mitigate risks like artificially inflated prices, changes to project specifications after bids are submitted, or budget uncertainties that might arise during the procurement process. It also addresses issues like sudden changes in the quantity of work, unwarranted negotiations, and delays in finalizing contract agreements.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Key Points
- •Limits on quantity changes: Bid documents must specify limits on how much the original quantity or scope of work can be reduced or increased.
- •Negotiation restrictions: Post-tender negotiations are generally discouraged, except in specific situations like procurement of proprietary items or suspected cartel formation.
- •Contract finalization timeline: A target timeline for finalizing procurement should be established, and any delays must be documented and justified.
- •Contract adherence: The final contract should strictly adhere to the original bid conditions and the accepted offer.
Practical Example
The Department of Irrigation is procuring pipes for a new canal project. The initial tender was for 10,000 meters of pipe. After receiving bids, the Chief Engineer, Mr. Sharma, decides he only needs 8,000 meters due to a revised project plan. Para 5.7.7 requires that the bid documents specified a limit on quantity reduction. If the limit was 20%, reducing the quantity to 8,000 meters (a 20% reduction) is acceptable. However, if Mr. Sharma then tries to negotiate a lower price with the lowest bidder, M/s SteelCo, after the bids are opened, it would violate Para 5.7.7 unless there was a suspicion of cartel formation. Furthermore, any delays in signing the contract with M/s SteelCo after the Technical Committee's approval must be documented and justified to the Competent Authority.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if the lowest bidder (L-1) backs out after negotiations?▼
Can we change the terms of the contract after the bids have been evaluated?▼
Are post-tender negotiations always prohibited?▼
What should I do if I suspect a cartel is forming during the bidding process?▼
What is the consequence of unwarranted delays in finalizing the contract?▼
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Test Your Knowledge
Question 1 of 3
According to Para 5.7.7 of the Works Manual, what is the general rule regarding post-tender negotiations?
Related Rules
Need help understanding this rule?
Ask Niti — your AI assistant for WORKS_MANUAL and other government rules