Rule 42 - Overcharge Responsibility | KartavyaDesk
Original Rule Text
42. Overcharges.– Subject to such special orders as the Government may issue in any case, the responsibility for an overcharge shall rest primarily with the drawer of a bill and it is only in the event of culpable negligence on the part of the controlling officer or of the PAO that the question of recovery from either of them may be considered.
What This Means
Rule 42 of the Receipt and Payment Rules deals with the responsibility for overcharges in government bills. Essentially, it states that if a bill results in an overpayment, the primary responsibility falls on the person who prepared and submitted the bill (the 'drawer'). This means they are the first ones held accountable for the error. The rule aims to ensure that those preparing bills are careful and accurate in their calculations and submissions.
However, the rule also acknowledges that other officials might share responsibility in certain situations. If a Controlling Officer or the Pay and Accounts Officer (PAO) shows 'culpable negligence' – meaning they were clearly careless or failed to perform their duties properly – then the possibility of recovering the overcharge from them can also be considered. This ensures that those in supervisory roles are also diligent in their oversight of financial transactions. The Government can also issue special orders to modify the application of this rule in specific cases.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Key Points
- •Primary responsibility for overcharges rests with the bill drawer.
- •Controlling Officer or PAO can be held responsible only in cases of 'culpable negligence'.
- •The Government retains the power to issue special orders modifying the rule's application.
- •The rule aims to promote accuracy and diligence in bill preparation and financial oversight.
- •Recovery of overcharge can be considered from Controlling Officer or PAO if they are negligent.
Practical Example
Mr. Sharma, a Junior Assistant in the Ministry of Rural Development, prepares a travel allowance (TA) bill for a senior officer, claiming ₹15,000. Due to a miscalculation of the distance traveled, the correct amount should have been ₹12,000. The bill is processed and paid. Later, an audit reveals the ₹3,000 overcharge. According to Rule 42, Mr. Sharma is primarily responsible for the overcharge, and the government will likely seek to recover the ₹3,000 from him. However, if the Controlling Officer, Mr. Verma, routinely signs off on bills without proper scrutiny, and it's proven he was aware of Mr. Sharma's frequent errors but did nothing, then the possibility of recovering a portion of the overcharge from Mr. Verma could also be considered.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does 'culpable negligence' mean in the context of Rule 42?▼
If an overcharge is detected, does it automatically mean the bill drawer is penalized?▼
Can the PAO be held responsible for an overcharge even if they didn't directly prepare the bill?▼
What kind of 'special orders' might the Government issue related to Rule 42?▼
Does Rule 42 apply to all types of bills and payments?▼
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Test Your Knowledge
Question 1 of 3
According to Rule 42 of the Receipt and Payment Rules, who bears the primary responsibility for an overcharge in a government bill?
Related Rules
Need help understanding this rule?
Ask Niti — your AI assistant for RPR and other government rules