KartavyaDesk

Para 7.2.3 - Tender Committee Dissent | KartavyaDesk

Non-Consultancy Manual

Original Rule Text

7.2.3. Handling Dissent among Tender Committee 1. All members of the TC should resolve their differences through personal discussions instead of making to and fro references in writing. In cases where it is not possible to come to a consensus and differences persist amongst TC members, the reasons for dissent of a member should be recorded in a balanced manner along with the majority’s views on the dissent note. The final recommendations should be that of the majority view. However, such situations should be rare. The Competent Authority (CA) can overrule such dissent notes after recording reasons for doing so clearly. His decision would be final. 2. In cases where the CA does not agree with the majority or unanimous recommendations of the TC, he should record his views and, if possible, firstly send it back to TC to reconsider along the lines of the tender accepting authority’s views. However, if the TC, after considering the views of the CA, sticks to its own earlier recommendations, the CA can finally decide as deemed fit, duly recording detailed reasons. He will be responsible for such decisions. However, such situations should be rare.

What This Means

Para 7.2.3 of the Manual for Procurement of Non-Consultancy Services deals with disagreements within the Tender Committee (TC). The rule emphasizes resolving differences through discussion. If a consensus can't be reached, any dissenting member's reasons must be formally recorded alongside the majority's view. The majority's recommendation prevails, but the Competent Authority (CA) can overrule it, provided they document their reasons clearly. This process aims to ensure transparency and accountability when disagreements arise during the tender evaluation process. It affects all members of the Tender Committee and the Competent Authority responsible for approving the tender.

This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.

Key Points

  • •Tender Committee members should first try to resolve disagreements through discussion.
  • •Dissenting opinions must be recorded with reasons, alongside the majority view.
  • •The Competent Authority can overrule the majority view, but must record their reasons.
  • •If the CA disagrees, the TC should reconsider the decision based on the CA's views.
  • •The Competent Authority is ultimately responsible for the final decision.

Practical Example

The Tender Committee for procuring office stationery, consisting of Mr. Sharma, Ms. Verma, and Mr. Patel, is evaluating bids. Mr. Sharma and Ms. Verma favor Vendor A, whose bid is Rs. 50,000. Mr. Patel believes Vendor B's bid of Rs. 52,000 is better value due to the higher quality of stationery. They discuss, but Mr. Patel remains unconvinced. His dissent is recorded, outlining his reasons for preferring Vendor B. The majority (Mr. Sharma and Ms. Verma) still recommend Vendor A. The file goes to the Competent Authority, Mr. Singh, who initially agrees with the majority. However, after reviewing Mr. Patel's dissent note, he asks the TC to reconsider. The TC sticks to its original recommendation. Mr. Singh, after recording detailed reasons, approves Vendor B's bid, citing the long-term cost savings from higher quality stationery.

This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if the Tender Committee is split 50/50?▼
The rule emphasizes the 'majority view.' If a clear majority cannot be established, the Competent Authority's decision is crucial. They must carefully consider all viewpoints and record their reasons for the final decision.
Can a Tender Committee member refuse to sign the final recommendation if they disagree?▼
While a member can't refuse to sign, their dissent must be formally recorded. Signing acknowledges the process, not necessarily agreement with the outcome.
What constitutes a valid reason for the Competent Authority to overrule the Tender Committee?▼
The reasons must be clearly documented and justifiable, demonstrating that overruling the TC is in the best interest of the organization. Examples include significant cost savings, superior quality, or alignment with strategic objectives that the TC may have overlooked.
Is it mandatory for the CA to send the recommendation back to the TC for reconsideration?▼
The rule states that the CA should 'if possible' send it back to the TC. This implies that it is highly recommended, but not strictly mandatory. The CA can directly make the final decision after recording detailed reasons, especially if time is a constraint.
What if the Competent Authority doesn't record reasons for overruling the TC?▼
Failure to record reasons is a violation of the rule and could lead to scrutiny and potential disciplinary action. Transparency and accountability are paramount.

This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.

Test Your Knowledge

Question 1 of 3

According to Para 7.2.3 of the Manual for Procurement of Non-Consultancy Services, what is the first course of action Tender Committee (TC) members should take when disagreements arise?

Related Rules

Para 3.2Manual for Procurement of Non-Consultancy Services, 2025 - Para 3.2 - Chapter 3Para 4.1.1Manual for Procurement of Non-Consultancy Services, 2025 - Para 4.1.1 - Chapter 3Para 4.2.3Manual for Procurement of Non-Consultancy Services, 2025 - Para 4.2.3 - Chapter 3Para 4.4Manual for Procurement of Non-Consultancy Services, 2025 - Para 4.4 - Chapter 3Para 6.8Manual for Procurement of Non-Consultancy Services, 2025 - Para 6.8 - Chapter 6

Need help understanding this rule?

Ask Niti — your AI assistant for Non-Consultancy Manual and other government rules