Rule 298 — GFR 2017
Original Rule Text
Rule 298
Retrospective
sanctions.
Retrospective effect shall not be given by
competent
authorities
to
sanctions
relating to revision of pay or grant of
concessions to Government servants,
except in very special circumstances with
the previous consent of the Ministry of
Finance.
What This Means
This rule explains when financial decisions affecting government employees can start. Generally, any decision to change a government employee's salary (like a pay raise) or to give them new benefits (like a special allowance) cannot be applied to a date in the past. This means if a decision is made today, it should usually take effect from today or a future date, not from last month or last year.
The rule applies to all government authorities who are empowered to approve such financial changes. They are generally prohibited from giving "retrospective effect" – meaning applying a decision backward in time – to these types of sanctions. The only exception is if there are truly "very special circumstances." Even then, the authority must get explicit permission from the Ministry of Finance *before* they can make the decision apply to a past date.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Key Points
- 1Government authorities generally cannot make decisions about employee pay revisions or new benefits apply to a date in the past.
- 2This prohibition applies to all sanctions related to changes in salary or the grant of concessions to government servants.
- 3A retrospective effect means applying a financial decision from an earlier date than when it was actually approved.
- 4An exception is allowed only under "very special circumstances."
- 5Even in special cases, prior approval from the Ministry of Finance is mandatory before giving any retrospective effect.
Practical Example
Imagine the Department of Rural Development decided in June 2023 to introduce a new "Remote Area Allowance" of Rs. 2,000 per month for officers posted in specific difficult regions. The department head, Mr. Sharma, wants this allowance to be paid to eligible officers starting from January 2023, as the officers had been serving in those areas since then and the need was identified much earlier.
According to Rule 298, Mr. Sharma cannot simply approve the allowance with retrospective effect from January 2023. Even though the officers deserve it, this would be a "grant of concession" with retrospective effect. To make the allowance applicable from January 2023, Mr. Sharma's department would first need to demonstrate "very special circumstances" for the delay in sanctioning and then obtain the explicit, prior consent of the Ministry of Finance. Without this consent, the allowance can only be paid from June 2023 (the date of sanction) or a future date.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Frequently Asked Questions
▼
▼
▼
▼
▼
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.