Rule 32 — CCS (CCA) Rules
Original Rule Text
32. Omitted
32. Central Information Service-
Selection Grade Senior. Administrative Grade Junior Administrative Grade Grade I Grade II
What This Means
Rule 32 was omitted from the main body of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965. As it now stands in the official text of the rules, the content at this position belongs to the Schedule and relates to the classification of a specific Central Civil Service — the Central Information Service — and its grades (Selection Grade, Senior Administrative Grade, Junior Administrative Grade, Grade I, and Grade II). The Schedule entries describe the appointing authority, disciplinary authority, and penalty powers applicable to each grade of the Central Information Service, consistent with the overall framework established by Rules 5, 9, 12, and 24.
For practical purposes, government officers should note that Rule 32 as a substantive provision within the main text was deliberately omitted and has no operative disciplinary content. The schedule material appearing alongside is part of the broader Schedule to the Rules (which is referenced in Rules 5, 9, 12, and 24), not part of the main rule text.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Key Points
- 1Rule 32 was omitted from the substantive body of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965.
- 2The text associated with Rule 32's position in the document belongs to the Schedule, covering the Central Information Service grades.
- 3There is no operative substantive provision in Rule 32.
- 4Officers should not cite Rule 32 as authority for any disciplinary action or procedure.
- 5The Schedule entries at this position define appointing and disciplinary authorities for the Central Information Service grades.
Practical Example
During an audit of departmental procedures, a junior officer of the Central Information Service mistakenly cited 'Rule 32' as authority for initiating a specific disciplinary action. The Senior Audit Officer pointed out that Rule 32 had been omitted and carried no substantive content. The officer was advised to refer to the correct operative rules (Rules 14–19 for inquiry procedures) and to check the Schedule specifically applicable to the Central Information Service for the relevant appointing and disciplinary authority details.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Frequently Asked Questions
▼
▼
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.