Rule 19 — Rule 19 carves out three situations where the norm
Original Rule Text
19
EXPLANATION- If in the opinion of the inquiring authority the proceedings of the inquiry establish any article of charge different from the original articles of the charge, it may record its findings on such article of charge:
Provided that the findings on such article of charge shall not be recorded unless the Government servant has either admitted the facts on which such article of charge is based or has had a reasonable opportunity of defending himself against such article of charge.
(ii) The inquiring authority, where it is not itself the disciplinary authority, shall forward to the disciplinary authority the records of inquiry which shall include :-
(a) the report prepared by it under clause (i);
(b) the written statement of defence, if any, submitted by the Government servant;
(c) the oral and documentary evidence produced in the course of the inquiry;
(d) written briefs, if any, filed by the Presenting Officer or the Government servant or both during the course of the inquiry; and
(e) the orders, if any, made by the disciplinary authority and the inquiring authority in regard to the inquiry.
24
(a) The Inquiring Authority should conclude the inquiry and submit his report within a period of six months from the date of receipt of order of his appointment as Inquiring Authority.
(b) Where it is not possible to adhere to the time limit specified in clause (a), the Inquiring Authority may record the reasons and seek extension of time from the disciplinary authority in writing, who may allow an additional time not exceeding six months for completion of the Inquiry, at a time.
(c) The extension for a period not exceeding six months at a time may be allowed for any good and sufficient reasons to be recorded in writing by the Disciplinary Authority or any other Authority authorised by the Disciplinary Authority on his behalf.
Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965
20
15. Action on inquiry report
(1) The disciplinary authority, if it is not itself the inquiring authority may, for reasons to be recorded by it in writing, remit the case to the inquiring authority for further inquiry and report and the inquiring authority shall thereupon proceed to hold the further inquiry according to the provisions of Rule 14, as far as may be.
(2) The disciplinary authority shall forward or cause to be forwarded a copy of the report of the inquiry, if any, held by the disciplinary authority or where the disciplinary authority is not the inquiring authority, a copy of the report of the inquiring authority together with its own tentative reasons for disagreement, if any, with the findings of inquiring authority on any article of charge to the Government servant who shall be required to submit, if he so desires, his written representation or submission to the disciplinary authority within fifteen days, irrespective of whether the report is favourable or not to the Government servant.
(3)
(a) In every case where it is necessary to consult the Commission, the Disciplinary Authority shall forward or cause to be forwarded to the Commission for its advice:
(i) a copy of the report of the Inquiring Authority together with its own tentative reasons for disagreement, if any, with the findings of Inquiring Authority on any article of charge; and
(ii) comments of Disciplinary Authority on the representation of the Government servant on the Inquiry report and disagreement note, if any and all the case records of the inquiry proceedings.
(b) The Disciplinary Authority shall forward or cause to be forwarded a copy of the advice of the Commission received under clause
(a) to the Government servant, who shall be required to submit, if he so desires, his written representation or submission to the Disciplinary Authority within fifteen days, on the advice of the Commission.
(4) The Disciplinary Authority shall consider the representation under subrule (2) and/or clause
(b) of sub-rule (3), if any, submitted by the Government servant and record its findings before proceedings further in the matter as specified in sub-rules (5) and (6).
(5) If the Disciplinary Authority having regard to its findings on all or any of the articles of charge is of the opinion that any of the penalties specified in clauses
(i) to
(iv) of rule 11 should be imposed on the Government servant, it shall, notwithstanding anything contained in rule 16, make an order imposing such penalty.
Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965
21
(6) If the Disciplinary Authority having regard to its findings on all or any of the articles of charge and on the basis of the evidence adduced during the inquiry is of the opinion that any of the penalties specified in clauses
(v) to
(ix) of rule 11 should be imposed on the Government servant, it shall make an order imposing such penalty and it shall not be necessary to give the Government servant any opportunity of making representation on the penalty proposed to be imposed.
16.Procedure for imposing minor penalties
(1) Subject to the provisions of sub-rule (5) of rule 15, no order imposing on a Government servant any of the penalties specified in clause
(i) to
(iv) of rule 11 shall be made except after-
(a) informing the Government servant in writing of the proposal to take action against him and of the imputations of misconduct or misbehaviour on which it is proposed to be taken, and giving him reasonable opportunity of making such representation as he may wish to make against the proposal;
(b) holding an inquiry in the manner laid down in sub-rules (3) to (24) of rule 14, in every case in which the disciplinary authority is of the opinion that such inquiry is necessary;
(c) taking the representation, if any, submitted by the Government servant under clause
(a) and the record of inquiry, if any, held under clause
(b) into consideration;
(d) consulting the Commission where such consultation is necessary. The Disciplinary Authority shall forward or cause to be forwarded a copy of the advice of the Commission to the Government servant, who shall be required to submit, if he so desires, his written representation or submission on the advice of the Commission, to the Disciplinary Authority within fifteen days; and
(e) recording a finding on each imputation or misconduct or misbehavior.
(1-A) Notwithstanding anything contained in clause
(b) of sub-rule (1), if in a case it is proposed after considering the representation, if any, made by the Government servant under clause
(a) of that sub-rule, to withhold increments of pay and such withholding of increments is likely to affect adversely the amount of pension payable to the Government servant or to withhold increments of pay for a period exceeding three years or to withhold increments of pay with cumulative effect for any period, an inquiry shall be held in the manner laid down in sub-rules (3) to (24) of Rule 14, before making any order imposing on the Government servant any such penalty.
(2) The record of the proceedings in such cases shall include-
Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965
22
(i) a copy of the intimation to the Government servant of the proposal to take action against him;
(ii) a copy of the statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehaviour delivered to him;
(iii) his representation, if any;
(iv) the evidence produced during the inquiry;
(v) the advice of the Commission, if any;
(vi) representation, if any, of the Government servant on the advice of the Commission;
(vii) the findings on each imputation of misconduct or misbehavior; and
(viii) the orders on the case together with the reasons therefor.
17. Communication of Orders
Orders made by the disciplinary authority shall be communicated to the Government servant who shall also be supplied with a copy of its finding on each article of charge, or where the disciplinary authority is not the inquiring authority, a statement of the findings of the disciplinary authority together with brief reasons for its disagreement, if any, with the findings of the inquiring authority and also a copy of the advice, if any, given by the Commission, and where the disciplinary authority has not accepted the advice of the Commission, a brief statement of the reasons for such non-acceptance.
18. Common Proceedings
(1) Where two or more Government servants are concerned in any case, the President or any other authority competent to impose the penalty of dismissal from service on all such Government servants may make an order directing that disciplinary action against all of them may be taken in a common proceeding.
NOTE - If the authorities competent to impose the penalty of dismissal on such Government servants are different, an order for taking disciplinary action in a common proceeding may be made by the highest of such authorities with the consent of the others.
(2) Subject to the provisions of sub-rule (4) of rule 12, any such order shall specify-
(i) the authority which may function as the disciplinary authority for the purpose of such common proceeding;
(ii) the penalties specified in rule 11 which such disciplinary authority shall be competent to impose;
(iii) whether the procedure laid down in rule 14 and rule 15 or rule 16 shall be followed in the proceeding.
Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965
23
19. Special procedure in certain cases
Notwithstanding anything contained in rule 14 to rule 18-
(i) where any penalty is imposed on a Government servant on the ground of conduct which has led to his conviction on a criminal charge, or
(ii) where the disciplinary authority is satisfied for reasons to be recorded by it in writing that it is not reasonably practicable to hold an inquiry in the manner provided in these rules, or (iii)where the President is satisfied that in the interest of the security of the State, it is not expedient to hold any inquiry in the manner provided in these rules,
the disciplinary authority may consider the circumstances of the case and make such orders thereon as it deems fit:
Provided that the Government servant may be given an opportunity of making representation on the penalty proposed to be imposed before any order is made in a case under clause (i):
Provided that the Commission shall be consulted, where such consultation is necessary, and the Government servant has been given an opportunity of representing against the advice of the Commission, within the time limit specified in clause
(b) of sub-rule (3) of rule 15, before any orders are made In any case under this rule.
What This Means
Rule 19 carves out three situations where the normal inquiry process (Rules 14 to 18) can be bypassed and the disciplinary authority can act directly. These exceptional circumstances are: (1) when the government servant has already been convicted by a criminal court, so the guilt is already established by a judicial process; (2) when it is genuinely not practicable to hold a formal inquiry — for instance because witnesses are unavailable or fear intimidation — and this must be recorded in writing; and (3) when the President determines that holding an inquiry would compromise national security.
Even in these exceptional cases, the government servant is not left entirely without recourse. In conviction cases (clause i), the employee must be given an opportunity to make a representation about the proposed penalty before any order is passed. This is a vital safeguard — while the government can bypass the full inquiry, it cannot impose punishment without giving the person a chance to speak about why a lesser penalty should apply.
Where the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) consultation is required by rules — generally for Group A and Group B officers — that consultation must still happen. Furthermore, after the Commission gives its advice, the government servant must be given an opportunity to represent against that advice within the prescribed time limit before a final order is made. Rule 19 is therefore a safety valve, not a blank cheque to dismiss employees arbitrarily.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Key Points
- 1Three exceptional situations allow bypassing the normal inquiry procedure: criminal conviction, impracticability of holding inquiry, and security of the State.
- 2The disciplinary authority must record in writing why a formal inquiry is not practicable (clause ii) — a verbal decision is not sufficient.
- 3In conviction cases (clause i), the employee must be given an opportunity to represent against the proposed penalty before any order is made.
- 4The President's satisfaction in security cases (clause iii) is final; lower authorities cannot invoke this clause on their own.
- 5UPSC consultation, wherever mandatory, must still take place even when using the special procedure.
- 6After UPSC advice, the government servant has the right to represent against that advice within the time limit fixed under Rule 15(3)(b).
- 7This rule is an exception, not the norm — courts expect it to be used sparingly and the reasons to be genuine.
Practical Example
Sub-Inspector Ramesh Kumar of a Central Paramilitary unit was convicted by a Sessions Court for accepting a bribe from a civilian and sentenced to six months of imprisonment. The disciplinary authority — the DIG (Discipline) — initiated action under Rule 19(i) since a criminal court had already established guilt. No fresh departmental inquiry was held. Before issuing the dismissal order, the DIG issued a show-cause notice asking Ramesh Kumar why the major penalty of dismissal should not be imposed. Ramesh Kumar submitted a representation claiming mitigating circumstances, including a large medical debt. The DIG considered the representation, decided the mitigating factors did not warrant leniency given the gravity of the offence, and passed a final order of dismissal. Since Ramesh Kumar was a Group B officer, the UPSC was consulted, and Ramesh was given an opportunity to represent against the Commission's advice before the final order was issued.
Had the DIG not given Ramesh the chance to represent on the penalty, the entire order could have been challenged and set aside by the Central Administrative Tribunal on procedural grounds — even though the criminal conviction stood.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Cross References
Frequently Asked Questions
▼
▼
▼
▼
▼
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.