ups_01247 — The Applicant herein, who retired as Superintendent of Central Excise on 30-4-1987, when 4th Central Pay Commission scales of pay was in force, was fixed in the 5th Central Pay Commission scales of pay of ₹ 7,500-12,000 which was the upgraded pay scales of that post from ₹ 6,500-10,500 on 21-4-2004 which fixation is retained for his pay fixation. 6th Central Pay Commission scales of pay added grade pay and ensured that his pay is not lower than 50% of the minimum pay in the Pay Ban

The Applicant herein, who retired as Superintendent of Central Excise on 30-4-1987, when 4th Central Pay Commission scales of pay was in force, was fixed in the 5th Central Pay Commission scales of pay of ₹ 7,500-12,000 which was the upgraded pay scales of that post from ₹ 6,500-10,500 on 21-4-2004 which fixation is retained for his pay fixation. 6th Central Pay Commission scales of pay added grade pay and ensured that his pay is not lower than 50% of the minimum pay in the Pay Band plus Grade Pay corresponding to pre-revised pay scale of ₹ 7,500-12,000. He was advised to approach the concerned authority of his erstwhile department for inclusion of his widowed daughter for family pension and grant of Fixed Medical Allowance (FMA) — This chunk discusses a case where a pensioner, who retired in 1987 under 4th Central Pay Commission scales, had his pension revised when the 5th and then 6th Central Pay Commissions were introduced. ... — Facts: The Applicant herein, retired while working as Superintendent of Central Excise on 30-4-1987 when 4th Central Pay Commission scales of pay was force and his pension was fixed. On introduction of 5th Central Pay Commission, his pension was fixed which was revised as ₹ 9,052 with effect from 1-1-2006 when 6th Central Pay Commission scales of pay was introduced. He then sent a representation to include his widowed daughter in the PPO and for grant of Fixed Medical Allowance (FMA). As no action was taken by the Department, he filed this OA for fixation of his pension as ₹ 9,750 with effect from 1-1-2006 and payment of arrears arising thereof with interest, grant of FMA and inclusion of his widowed daughter in his PPO. The Tribunal heard both sides. It held: