ups_00512 — The pension of the Applicant who is over 90 years old, should be fixed as per Rule and the observation made in the case of State of Punjab and others v. Rafiq Masih in Civil Appeal No. 11527/2014, dated 18-12-2014 [ (2014) 8 SCC - 883 ] which fully covers the claim of the Applicant in his case for proper fixation of Pension

The pension of the Applicant who is over 90 years old, should be fixed as per Rule and the observation made in the case of State of Punjab and others v. Rafiq Masih in Civil Appeal No. 11527/2014, dated 18-12-2014 [ (2014) 8 SCC - 883 ] which fully covers the claim of the Applicant in his case for proper fixation of Pension — Individual case of a super-aged pensioner seeking correct pension fixation per Rule, based on the judgment in State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih. The pensioner was wrongly fixed at 5,637 instead of the m... — Facts : This is an individual case of a super-aged pensioner who retired on 31-10-1985 when he was serving as Head Storekeeper in the scale of pay of ₹ 425 - 600 and was issued with a PPO as per Rule. As per 6th CPC his pension is to be fixed as ₹ 6,750 plus grade pay. However his pension is wrongly fixed as ₹ 5,637. He prays for the minimum pension of ₹ 7,215 related to the grade S-10 with effect from 1-1-2006. Tribunal after hearing both sides held: