om:32-cl-2014-mar — Appointment to the post of GDS BPM, in this case, appointment of GDS BPM, Pali, is to be done strictly following D.G. Posts, Letter No. 41/295/87-PE II, dated the 27th August, 1987 and 17-108/94-ED & Trg., dated 14-12-1994 and Note II (vii) and (viii) below Rule 3 (j) of Gramin Dak Sevak (Conduct and Employment) Rules, 2001 which is statutory in nature. The rules, dated 1987 and 1994 (supra). makes it clear that permanent residency or prior resident of the village is an e

Appointment to the post of GDS BPM, in this case, appointment of GDS BPM, Pali, is to be done strictly following D.G. Posts, Letter No. 41/295/87-PE II, dated the 27th August, 1987 and 17-108/94-ED & Trg., dated 14-12-1994 and

Note II

(vii) and

(viii) below Rule 3

(j) of Gramin Dak Sevak (Conduct and Employment) Rules, 2001 which is statutory in nature. The rules, dated 1987 and 1994 (supra). makes it clear that permanent residency or prior resident of the village is an essential requirement for consideration for the post. Only if no candidate had applied from the village, then only question of considering candidates from outside village arises — This chunk discusses an Original Application (OA) No. 1374 of 2010 challenging the appointment of a GDS BPM in Pali, due to alleged non-compliance with statutory rules regarding permanent residency o... — Facts: For the post of GDS BPM (Pali) was initiated and Private Respondent No. 5 was appointed. That was challenged by the Applicant by filing O.A. No. 837 of 2009 which was disposed of by the Tribunal to dispose of his case treating the said OA as a part of the representation by Order, dated 11-11-2009. The said representation was rejected. Hence the present OA is filed to set aside the appointment of R-5. Validity of the order to appointment of R-5 is questioned in this OA. The relevant points in this OA have been completely captured in the order of the Tribunal. Hence it is enough if the final order of the Tribunal is reproduced. It was held by Tribunal: