KartavyaDesk

Para 9.9.5 - Arbitration Rules | KartavyaDesk

Goods Manual

Original Rule Text

9.9.5 Arbitration 1. Arbitration Agreement: If an amicable settlement is not forthcoming, recourse may be taken to the settlement of disputes through arbitration as per the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [Amended 2015120 and 2021121]. For this purpose, when the contract is with a domestic supplier, a standard arbitration clause (hereinafter called the ‘Agreement’) may be included in the Tender Document (Please refer to the Model Tender Document) indicating the arbitration procedure to be followed, based on which the Arbitration Act shall become applicable. 2. This Agreement shall continue to survive termination, completion, or closure of the Contract for 120 days after that. The venue of arbitration should be the place from where the contract has been issued. 3. The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006 provides parties to a dispute (where one of the parties is a Micro or Small Enterprise) to be referred to the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council if the dispute is regarding any amount due under Section 17 of the MSMED Act, 2006. If a Micro or Small Enterprise, being a party to dispute, refers to the provisions in the MSMED Act 2006, these provisions shall prevail over this Agreement. 4. Government Guidelines on Arbitration in Contracts: Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance has issued following guidelines122 for arbitration in contracts of domestic procurement by the Government and by its entities and agencies (including Central Public Sector Enterprises [CPSEs], Public Sector Banks [PSBs] etc. and Government companies): a) Arbitration as a method of dispute resolution should not be routinely or automatically included in procurement contracts/ tenders, especially in large contracts. b) As a norm, arbitration (if included in contracts) may be restricted to disputes with a value less than Rs. 10 crores. This figure is regarding the value of the dispute (not the value of the contract, which may be much higher). It may be specifically mentioned in the bid conditions/ conditions of the contract that arbitration will not be a method of dispute resolution in all other cases. c) Inclusion of arbitration clauses covering disputes with a value exceeding the norm specified in sub-para (b) above should be based on careful application of mind and recording of reasons and with the approval of: i) Regarding Government Ministries/ Departments, attached/ subordinate offices and autonomous bodies, the Secretary concerned or an officer (not below the level of Joint Secretary) to whom authority is delegated by the Secretary. ii) Regarding CPSEs/ PSBs/ Financial institutions etc., the Managing Director. d) In matters where arbitration is to be resorted to, institutional arbitration may be given preference (where appropriate, after considering the reasonableness of the cost of arbitration relative to the value involved). e) General or case-specific modification in the application of the above guidelines may be authorised by the Secretary concerned (or an officer not below the level of Joint Secretary to whom the authority is delegated by him) in respect of Government

What This Means

Para 9.9.5 of the Manual for Procurement of Goods, 2017, deals with resolving disputes through arbitration when disagreements arise between the government and a supplier after a contract is signed. Think of it as a way to settle arguments outside of court. If you can't agree on a solution through friendly negotiation, you can use arbitration, which involves an impartial third party who helps find a fair resolution. The Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, provides the legal framework for this process.

This rule also sets some limits on when arbitration should be used. Generally, it's preferred for disputes involving smaller amounts (less than ₹10 crores). For larger disputes, government departments need to carefully consider whether arbitration is the best approach and get approval from senior officials. Also, if the supplier is a small business (Micro or Small Enterprise) and the dispute involves payments owed to them, the MSMED Act, 2006 takes precedence, offering a specific mechanism for resolving those issues. The agreement to arbitrate continues for 120 days after the contract is finished.

This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.

Key Points

  • Arbitration is a method of dispute resolution under the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
  • Arbitration is generally preferred for disputes valued under ₹10 crores.
  • For disputes exceeding ₹10 crores, approval from senior officials (Secretary/Joint Secretary level or MD) is required.
  • The MSMED Act, 2006 takes precedence if the dispute involves payments to a Micro or Small Enterprise.
  • The arbitration agreement survives for 120 days after contract termination, completion, or closure.

Practical Example

The Ministry of Textiles awarded a contract to 'WeaveWell Pvt. Ltd.' for supplying fabric worth ₹8 crores. After delivery, a dispute arose regarding the quality of the fabric, with the Ministry claiming it didn't meet the required specifications. Amicable settlement attempts failed. Since the dispute value is below ₹10 crores, the standard arbitration clause in the contract was invoked. An arbitrator was appointed as per the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

In another scenario, the Department of Information Technology had a contract with 'GlobalTech Solutions' for a software development project worth ₹20 crores. A dispute arose regarding payment terms, with the disputed amount being ₹12 crores. Since the disputed amount exceeds ₹10 crores, the Department Secretary had to carefully consider the merits of arbitration and record the reasons for choosing arbitration before proceeding. They also considered institutional arbitration to ensure fairness and efficiency.

This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main purpose of Para 9.9.5?
To provide guidelines for resolving disputes through arbitration in procurement contracts, ensuring fairness and efficiency while adhering to legal frameworks and government guidelines.
When does the MSMED Act, 2006 take precedence over the standard arbitration clause?
When the dispute involves payments owed to a Micro or Small Enterprise, the provisions of the MSMED Act, 2006, will prevail.
What is the approval process for arbitration in disputes exceeding ₹10 crores?
For Government Ministries/Departments, approval is required from the Secretary concerned or an officer (not below the level of Joint Secretary) delegated by the Secretary. For CPSEs/PSBs, approval is required from the Managing Director.
What is institutional arbitration?
Institutional arbitration refers to arbitration conducted under the rules and administration of an established arbitration institution, offering structured processes and often specialized expertise.
How long does the arbitration agreement last?
The arbitration agreement continues to be valid for 120 days after the termination, completion, or closure of the contract.

This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.

Test Your Knowledge

Question 1 of 3

According to Para 9.9.5 of the Manual for Procurement of Goods, 2017, for how long does the arbitration agreement survive the termination, completion, or closure of the contract?

Related Rules

Need help understanding this rule?

Ask Niti — your AI assistant for Goods Manual and other government rules