Para 7.6.9 - Price Negotiation Rules | KartavyaDesk
Original Rule Text
174 2. In no case, including where cartel rates are suspected, should negotiations be extended to those who had either not tendered originally or whose bid was rejected because of unresponsiveness of bid, unsatisfactory credentials, inadequacy of capacity or unworkable rates. 3. Price negotiations may not be considered except under the following exceptional circumstances: a) Where L1 price is not considered to be reasonable, and i) the procurement is done on a nomination basis or ii) Procurement is from single or limited sources or iii) In situations where the requirements are urgent, and the delay in re-tendering for the entire requirement due to the unreasonableness of the quoted rates would jeopardise essential operations, maintenance, and safety - negotiations with L1 bidder(s) may be done for a bare minimum quantum of immediate requirements. The balance bulk requirement should, however, be procured through a re-tender, following the normal tender process. b) Where there is suspicion of cartel formation, which should be recorded, following provisions of para 7.6.8 above. 4. The decision whether to invite fresh tenders or to negotiate (and with whom) should be made by the tender accepting authority, based on the recommendations of the TC. Convincing reasons must be recorded by the authority recommending negotiations. The CA should exercise due diligence while accepting a tender, ordering negotiations, or calling for a re-tender, and a definite timeframe should be indicated. 5. Normally, all counter-offers are considered negotiations by other means, and the principles of negotiations should apply to such counter-offers. For example, a counter-offer to L1 to arrive at an acceptable rate shall amount to a negotiation. However, any counter-offer (at the rates accepted by L1) to L2, L3, and so on in case of splitting of quantities (and in parallel Rate Contracts) shall not be deemed to be a negotiation. Similarly, dynamic bids in the Reverse Auction process, as per para 4.5 above, are not to be considered as negotiations. 6. After the CA has decided to call a specific bidder for negotiation, the following procedure should be adopted: a) It must be understood that if the period of validity of the original offer expires before the close of negotiations, the original offer will not be available for acceptance. The period of validity of the original offer must, therefore, be extended, wherever necessary, before negotiations; b) The bidder to be called in for negotiations should be addressed as per the format of the letter laid down in Annexure 15 so that the rates originally quoted by him shall remain open for acceptance in the event of failure of the contemplated negotiation; c) A negotiation meeting should be started only after obtaining a signed declaration from the negotiating supplier as per Annexure 15. d) Revised bids should be obtained in writing from the selected bidders at the end of the negotiations in the format of the letter laid down in Annexure 16. The bidder should not be permitted to change any other condition of his bid other than lowering the price. The revised bids so obtained should be read out to the bidders or their representatives present immediately after completing the negotiations. If necessary, the negotiating party may be given some time to submit its revised offer. In case, however, the selected bidder prefers to send a revised bid instead of being present at the negotiation, the
What This Means
Para 7.6.9 of the Manual for Procurement of Goods, 2017, outlines the rules for price negotiations in government procurement. It generally discourages negotiations except in specific, well-defined situations. The rule emphasizes fairness and transparency, preventing negotiations with bidders who didn't initially participate or whose bids were rejected due to issues like being unresponsive or lacking capacity. This ensures that the procurement process remains competitive and prevents favoritism.
Negotiations are only allowed under exceptional circumstances, such as when the lowest bid (L1) is unreasonably high, there's suspicion of cartel formation, or urgent requirements necessitate immediate procurement. Even then, negotiations with the L1 bidder are limited to the bare minimum quantity needed urgently, with the remaining bulk to be re-tendered. The decision to negotiate or re-tender rests with the tender accepting authority, based on the Tender Committee's recommendations, and must be supported by convincing, documented reasons. This rule affects all government employees involved in procurement, especially those on tender committees and those with tender accepting authority, ensuring they follow a consistent and fair process.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Key Points
- •Negotiations are generally discouraged except in specific circumstances.
- •Negotiations are not allowed with bidders who didn't tender or whose bids were rejected.
- •Permissible negotiation scenarios include unreasonable L1 price, suspected cartel formation, and urgent requirements.
- •The tender accepting authority decides on negotiation or re-tendering based on the Tender Committee's recommendations.
- •All counter-offers are considered negotiations, except for splitting quantities at L1 rates and reverse auction bids.
Practical Example
The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) needs to procure 500 high-end servers. After receiving bids, the L1 bidder, 'Tech Solutions Pvt. Ltd.,' quoted a price significantly higher than the estimated market rate. The Tender Committee, after careful evaluation, suspects the price is unreasonable. Due to the urgency of the project, delaying it would impact citizen services. Following Para 7.6.9, MeitY can negotiate with Tech Solutions Pvt. Ltd. for a bare minimum of 100 servers to meet immediate needs. The remaining 400 servers must be procured through a fresh tender process to ensure a competitive price. The reasons for negotiating with L1 for the initial 100 servers are documented and approved by the tender accepting authority, ensuring transparency and compliance.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can we negotiate with a vendor whose bid was rejected because they didn't meet the technical specifications?▼
What if we suspect cartel formation among the bidders? Can we negotiate then?▼
If the L1 price is too high, can we directly negotiate with L2 to get a better price?▼
Does offering L2, L3 etc. the L1 rate to split the order count as negotiation?▼
Who makes the final decision on whether to negotiate or re-tender?▼
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Test Your Knowledge
Question 1 of 3
Under what circumstances, as per Para 7.6.9 of the Manual for Procurement of Goods, 2017, are negotiations with bidders who did not originally tender or whose bids were rejected permissible?
Related Rules
Need help understanding this rule?
Ask Niti — your AI assistant for Goods Manual and other government rules