Para 7.3 - Bid Rejection | KartavyaDesk
Original Rule Text
1. The bid is not in the prescribed format or is unsigned or not signed as per the stipulations in the tender document; 2. The required EMD has not been provided, or exemption from EMD is claimed without acceptable proof of exemption; 3. The bidder is not eligible to participate in the bid as per the eligibility criteria that have been laid down (including conflict of interest and other provisions of CIPP). In case procurement is on a limited tender basis or where procurement is restricted to pre-approved vendors, it should be especially ensured that there is no conflict of interest; 4. The bidder has quoted for goods manufactured by a different firm without the required authority letter from the proposed manufacturer; 5. The bid departs from the essential requirements specified in the tender document (for example, the bidder has not agreed to give the required performance security) or 6. Against a schedule in the list of requirements in the tender enquiry, the bidder has not quoted for the entire requirement as specified in that schedule (for example, in a schedule, it has been stipulated that the bidder will supply the equipment, install, and commission it and also train the purchaser's operators for operating the equipment. The bidder has, however, quoted only for the supply of the equipment). 7. Bidder has quoted conditional bids or more than one bid or alternative bids unless permitted explicitly in the Tender Document. 8. The bid validity is shorter than the required period. However, in case of STE/ PAC procurement, shorter bid validity may be accepted. 9. Non-submission or submission of illegible scanned copies of stipulated documents/ declarations, if so stipulated in the Tender Document.
What This Means
Para 7.3 of the Manual for Procurement of Goods, 2017 outlines the grounds for rejecting a bid during the tender process. Think of it as a checklist of reasons why a bid might be considered non-responsive and therefore disqualified. This rule ensures fairness and transparency by setting clear expectations for bidders and providing a basis for rejecting bids that don't meet those expectations. It applies to all government procurements of goods covered by the manual. It directly affects all bidders participating in government tenders and the government officials responsible for evaluating those bids.
Essentially, this rule protects the integrity of the procurement process by ensuring that all bids are complete, compliant, and meet the essential requirements outlined in the tender document. It covers issues like missing documents, incorrect formats, lack of required security deposits, eligibility problems, and deviations from the specified requirements. By adhering to this rule, government departments can ensure they are selecting the best possible bid based on a fair and consistent evaluation process.
This rule is crucial for maintaining accountability and preventing favoritism in government procurement. It provides a clear framework for rejecting non-compliant bids, ensuring that public funds are used responsibly and that the selected vendor is capable of delivering the required goods or services according to the specified terms and conditions.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Key Points
- •Bids can be rejected if not in the prescribed format or unsigned.
- •Failure to provide the required EMD (Earnest Money Deposit) or acceptable proof of exemption is grounds for rejection.
- •Bidders must meet eligibility criteria, including conflict of interest provisions.
- •Bids departing from essential tender requirements (e.g., performance security) can be rejected.
- •Conditional bids or multiple bids (unless explicitly permitted) are not acceptable.
Practical Example
The Ministry of Textiles issued a tender for the supply of 5000 cotton bales. Company 'A' submitted a bid, but failed to include the required Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) of ₹50,000, claiming an exemption without providing valid documentation. Additionally, their bid stated that the delivery timeline was subject to 'unforeseen circumstances,' making it a conditional bid.
Based on Para 7.3, the tender evaluation committee, led by Mr. Sharma, rejected Company A's bid. The committee cited the lack of EMD and the conditional nature of the bid as clear violations of the tender requirements. This ensured that only compliant and complete bids were considered for the contract, protecting the integrity of the procurement process.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does 'prescribed format' mean in the context of a bid?▼
What constitutes 'acceptable proof of exemption' from EMD?▼
What is 'conflict of interest' and why is it important in procurement?▼
What is an Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) and why is it required?▼
If a document is stipulated in the tender document, but the scanned copy is illegible, what happens?▼
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Test Your Knowledge
Question 1 of 3
According to Para 7.3 of the Manual for Procurement of Goods, 2017, under what circumstance can a bid be rejected due to Earnest Money Deposit (EMD)?
Related Rules
Need help understanding this rule?
Ask Niti — your AI assistant for Goods Manual and other government rules