Para 1 - Integrity in Procurement | KartavyaDesk
Original Rule Text
a. No employee of the Principal, personally or through family members, shall in connection with the tender for, or the execution of a contract, demand, take a promise for or accept, for self or third person, any material or immaterial benefit which the person is not legally entitled to. b. The Principal shall treat all Bidder(s) with equity and reason during the tender process. The Principal shall, in particular, before and during the tender process, provide to all Bidder(s) the same information and shall not provide to any Bidder(s) confidential / additional information through which the Bidder(s) could obtain an advantage in the tender process or the contract execution. c. The Principal shall exclude from the process all known persons having conflict of interest.
What This Means
Furthermore, the rule mandates equal treatment for all bidders. The government (referred to as 'The Principal') must provide the same information to all potential suppliers and avoid giving any bidder an unfair advantage through confidential or extra information. Finally, anyone with a conflict of interest must be excluded from the procurement process to ensure impartiality. This rule affects all government employees involved in procurement, as well as all companies or individuals bidding for government contracts.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Key Points
- •No personal or family benefits can be accepted in connection with tenders or contracts.
- •All bidders must be treated equally and given the same information.
- •Confidential information cannot be shared to give any bidder an advantage.
- •Individuals with conflicts of interest must be excluded from the procurement process.
- •The rule applies to all stages of the tendering process.
Practical Example
Mr. Sharma, a procurement officer in the Ministry of Textiles, is overseeing a tender for supplying uniforms to government schools. His brother-in-law owns a textile company that is bidding for the contract. Mr. Sharma knows that his brother-in-law's company is struggling financially. He cannot, under Para 1, provide his brother-in-law with inside information about the budget or the evaluation criteria to give him an edge. Furthermore, because of the clear conflict of interest, Mr. Sharma must recuse himself from the evaluation process entirely. If he were to accept a 'gift' of a new television from his brother-in-law after the contract is awarded, that would also be a violation of this rule.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Frequently Asked Questions
What constitutes a 'conflict of interest'?▼
If a family member owns a company bidding for a government contract, does that automatically disqualify the company?▼
What happens if someone violates Para 1?▼
Does this rule apply to all types of government procurement?▼
What kind of 'information' is covered by this rule?▼
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Test Your Knowledge
Question 1 of 3
According to the Manual for Procurement of Goods, 2017, what type of benefit is an employee of the Principal prohibited from accepting in connection with a tender or contract?
Related Rules
Need help understanding this rule?
Ask Niti — your AI assistant for Goods Manual and other government rules