Rule 78 — General Financial Rules 2017 (amended July 2024) - Rule 78
Original Rule Text
Rule 78 Classification of transactions in Government Accounts. As a general rule, classification of transactions in Government Accounts, shall have closer reference to functions, programmes and activities of the Government and the object of revenue or expenditure, rather than the department in which the revenue or expenditure occurs. Major Heads (comprising Sub-Major Heads wherever necessary) are divided into Minor Heads. Minor Heads may have a number of subordinate heads, generally known as Sub Heads. The Sub Heads are further divided into Detailed Heads followed by Object Heads. The Major Heads of account, falling within the sectors for expenditure heads, generally correspond to functions of Government, while the Minor Heads identify the programmes undertaken to achieve the objectives of the functions represented by the Major Head. The Sub Head represents schemes, the Detailed Head denotes sub scheme and Object Head represent the primary unit of appropriation showing the economic nature of expenditure such as salaries and wages, office expenses, travel expenses, professional services, grants- in-aid, etc. The above six tiers are represented by a unique 15-digit numeric code.
What This Means
This rule explains how all financial transactions, both money coming in (revenue) and money going out (expenditure), must be recorded in government accounts. The main idea is to categorize these transactions based on *what* the money is for – specifically, the government's functions, programs, and activities, and the actual purpose of the revenue or expenditure (e.g., salaries, office supplies). It's less about *which department* is handling the money and more about the *purpose* behind the financial movement.
This rule applies to all government officers involved in managing or recording financial transactions. When you process any financial transaction, you must ensure it is classified correctly using a detailed, structured system. This system uses a hierarchy of categories, starting with broad 'Major Heads' (representing government functions) and narrowing down to 'Minor Heads' (for specific programs), 'Sub Heads' (for schemes), 'Detailed Heads' (for sub-schemes), and finally 'Object Heads' (which describe the actual type of expense, like salaries or travel).
Each level of this classification helps create a clear and consistent picture of where government money is coming from and going to. This entire classification for a transaction is represented by a unique 15-digit numeric code, ensuring accuracy and transparency in financial reporting.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Key Points
- 1Government financial transactions must be classified primarily by their function, program, activity, and the object of expenditure, rather than solely by the department involved.
- 2The accounting structure follows a six-tier hierarchy: Major Head, Sub-Major Head (if applicable), Minor Head, Sub Head, Detailed Head, and Object Head.
- 3Major Heads represent broad government functions, while Minor Heads identify specific programs undertaken to achieve those functions.
- 4Sub Heads denote specific schemes, Detailed Heads signify sub-schemes, and Object Heads describe the economic nature of the expenditure (e.g., salaries, office expenses, grants).
- 5Every transaction is assigned a unique 15-digit numeric code that reflects its complete classification across these tiers.
- 6This detailed classification system ensures greater transparency, accountability, and better financial management by clearly showing the purpose of government funds.
Practical Example
Imagine a situation in the Ministry of Education where funds are allocated for a new 'Digital Literacy for Rural Schools' program. An officer, Mr. Sharma, is processing a payment for the salaries of newly recruited computer instructors for this program in a specific district.
According to Rule 78, Mr. Sharma cannot simply classify this as 'Ministry of Education - General Expenses.' Instead, he must classify it precisely: The 'Major Head' would be 'Education, Sports, Art and Culture' (a broad government function). The 'Minor Head' would be 'Elementary Education' (a program). The 'Sub Head' would be 'Digital Literacy for Rural Schools Scheme.' The 'Detailed Head' might be 'Salaries for Computer Instructors.' Finally, the 'Object Head' would be 'Salaries and Wages.' This detailed classification, represented by a 15-digit code, ensures that auditors and policymakers can easily see exactly how much is being spent on salaries for this specific digital literacy scheme within elementary education, rather than just knowing it's an expense from the Ministry of Education.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Frequently Asked Questions
▼
▼
▼
▼
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.