Para 8.6 - Freezing ToR | KartavyaDesk
Original Rule Text
8.6 Negotiations to Freeze Description of Service 1. In the Consultancy Services contract, the accepted ToR and methodology etc are laid down in form of ‘Description of Service’. Therefore, before the contract is finally awarded, discussions may be necessary with the selected bidder to freeze these aspects, especially when, it is discouraged during evaluation of technical proposals to seek clarifications on these matters. However, such technical discussions do not amount to negotiations in the sense, the word is used in Procurement of Goods and Works. However, in Procurement of Consultancy, this discussion is termed as Negotiations since these discussions may have some financial ramifications at least for the bidder. Negotiations are not an essential part of the selection process. In many cases, however, it is felt necessary to conduct negotiations with the selected consultant for discussions of the ToR, methodology, staffing, Procuring Entity's inputs, and special conditions of the contract. These discussions shall not substantially alter (or dilute) the original ToR or terms of the offer, lest the quality of the final product, its cost, and the initial evaluation be vitiated. The final ToR and the agreed methodology shall be incorporated in "Description of Services," which shall form part of the contract.
What This Means
Para 8.6 of the Manual for Procurement of Consultancy Services focuses on finalizing the 'Description of Service' before awarding a consultancy contract. Think of it as the last check to ensure everyone is on the same page. While technical clarifications are generally discouraged during the initial evaluation phase, this section allows for discussions with the selected bidder to solidify the Terms of Reference (ToR), methodology, and other key aspects of the project. These discussions are termed 'Negotiations' because they might indirectly impact the financial aspects for the consultant, even though the primary goal isn't to haggle over price.
These 'Negotiations' are not mandatory but are often necessary to fine-tune the project scope, staffing requirements, and the procuring entity's responsibilities. The important thing to remember is that these discussions shouldn't drastically change the original ToR or the consultant's proposed approach. The aim is to clarify and refine, not to fundamentally alter the project's objectives or compromise the quality of the expected deliverables. The final, agreed-upon ToR and methodology are then formally documented as the 'Description of Services,' which becomes a binding part of the contract.
This rule affects all government departments and agencies involved in procuring consultancy services. It ensures that the final contract accurately reflects the agreed-upon scope of work and prevents misunderstandings or disputes later on. It also protects the integrity of the initial evaluation process by preventing significant changes that could unfairly advantage or disadvantage the selected bidder.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Key Points
- •Para 8.6 concerns finalizing the 'Description of Service' (ToR, methodology) before contract award.
- •Discussions with the selected bidder are allowed to clarify and refine the project scope.
- •These discussions are termed 'Negotiations' due to potential financial implications for the consultant.
- •Negotiations should not substantially alter the original ToR or the consultant's offer.
- •The final 'Description of Services' becomes part of the contract.
Practical Example
The Ministry of Rural Development is hiring a consultant, 'Sustainable Solutions Pvt. Ltd.,' to develop a comprehensive rural sanitation plan for a district. After the technical evaluation, Sustainable Solutions is selected. Before awarding the contract, the Ministry's procurement team holds discussions with Sustainable Solutions to clarify the specific data collection methods, the number of field visits required, and the Ministry's role in providing logistical support. These discussions lead to a more detailed and mutually agreed-upon 'Description of Services.' For example, it's clarified that the Ministry will provide vehicles for field visits, reducing Sustainable Solutions' transportation costs by an estimated ₹50,000. This revised 'Description of Services,' including the agreed-upon logistical support, is then incorporated into the final contract. The original ToR remains largely unchanged, but the clarifications ensure a smoother project execution and avoid potential disputes later on.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are negotiations mandatory under Para 8.6?▼
Can we significantly change the ToR during these negotiations?▼
What happens if we can't agree on the 'Description of Service'?▼
Does this 'negotiation' mean we can bargain for a lower price?▼
Who should be involved in these negotiations?▼
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Test Your Knowledge
Question 1 of 3
According to Para 8.6 of the Manual for Procurement of Consultancy Services, what is the primary purpose of the discussions held with the selected bidder before awarding a consultancy contract?
Related Rules
Need help understanding this rule?
Ask Niti — your AI assistant for Consultancy Manual and other government rules