KartavyaDesk

Para 8.4.4 - Technical Evaluation | KartavyaDesk

Consultancy Manual

Original Rule Text

2. Eventually, for each of the technical proposals, the CEC should calculate the average of the scores allocated to each criterion by all members, establish the technical ranking of the proposals, identify the best, and propose it for award. The evaluation also establishes whether a proposal passes the minimum qualifying mark (or technical score, normally 75 (seventyfive)) provided for in the RfP. If one or more proposals fail to meet the minimum qualifying mark, both individual and joint assessments must be carefully reviewed and justified. Shortlisted consultants are usually discouraged when their proposals are rejected, particularly when they are only a few points below the minimum mark; therefore, the Procuring Entity should be prepared to debrief consultants to explain the evaluation of their proposals.

What This Means

Para 8.4.4 of the Manual for Procurement of Consultancy Services outlines how the Consultancy Evaluation Committee (CEC) should finalize the technical evaluation of proposals. After each member of the CEC has scored the proposals against pre-defined criteria, the committee needs to calculate the average score for each criterion for each proposal. This average score determines the technical ranking of the proposals, allowing the CEC to identify the top-ranked proposal for potential award. This rule applies to all government departments and agencies procuring consultancy services using the procedures outlined in the manual. It directly affects the CEC members, consultants submitting proposals, and ultimately, the procuring entity itself.

Crucially, the rule also emphasizes the importance of a minimum qualifying mark, typically 75, as defined in the Request for Proposal (RfP). Proposals failing to meet this threshold require careful review and justification of both individual and joint assessments. The procuring entity must be prepared to provide detailed feedback to consultants whose proposals are rejected, especially if they fall just short of the minimum mark. This ensures transparency and fairness in the procurement process, even when proposals are not successful.

This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.

Key Points

  • •CEC calculates the average score for each criterion for each technical proposal.
  • •Technical ranking is established based on the average scores.
  • •Proposals must meet a minimum qualifying mark (usually 75) as specified in the RfP.
  • •Rejection of proposals below the minimum mark requires careful review and justification.
  • •Procuring Entity should be prepared to debrief unsuccessful consultants, especially those close to the minimum mark.

Practical Example

The Ministry of Rural Development issued an RfP for a consultancy to improve rural infrastructure. Three firms, 'Gram Vikas Consultants,' 'Bharat Infrastructure Solutions,' and 'Desh Seva Associates,' submitted technical proposals. After individual evaluations, the CEC calculated the average scores. Gram Vikas Consultants scored 82, Bharat Infrastructure Solutions scored 74, and Desh Seva Associates scored 68.

Bharat Infrastructure Solutions' score of 74 was below the minimum qualifying mark of 75 specified in the RfP. The CEC carefully reviewed the individual assessments to ensure the evaluation was fair and accurate. Despite the review confirming the initial assessment, the Ministry prepared a detailed debriefing for Bharat Infrastructure Solutions, explaining the specific areas where their proposal fell short. Gram Vikas Consultants, having the highest score, was then considered for the financial evaluation stage.

This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if all proposals fail to meet the minimum qualifying mark?▼
If all proposals fail to meet the minimum qualifying mark, the Procuring Entity should carefully review the evaluation process to ensure it was conducted fairly and accurately. They may need to consider re-evaluating the proposals, amending the RfP, or even re-tendering the consultancy.
Is the minimum qualifying mark always 75?▼
No, the minimum qualifying mark is usually 75, but it can be different. The specific mark will be clearly stated in the Request for Proposal (RfP) document.
What should be included in the debriefing for unsuccessful consultants?▼
The debriefing should provide specific feedback on the strengths and weaknesses of the proposal, highlighting the areas where it did not meet the evaluation criteria. It should be constructive and aim to help the consultant improve future proposals.
Who is responsible for providing the debriefing to unsuccessful consultants?▼
The Procuring Entity, typically through the Consultancy Evaluation Committee (CEC) or a designated representative, is responsible for providing the debriefing.
What if a consultant disputes the evaluation results?▼
The Procuring Entity should have a mechanism in place to address disputes. This may involve reviewing the evaluation process again or providing further clarification to the consultant. However, the final decision rests with the Procuring Entity.

This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.

Test Your Knowledge

Question 1 of 3

According to Para 8.4.4 of the Manual for Procurement of Consultancy Services, what is the Consultancy Evaluation Committee (CEC) primarily responsible for after individual members have scored the technical proposals?

Related Rules

Para 8Manual for Procurement of Consultancy Services, 2025 - Para 8 - Chapter 10 - Annexure 18Para 9Manual for Procurement of Consultancy Services, 2025 - Para 9 - Chapter 10 - Annexure 18Para 1.10.2Manual for Procurement of Consultancy Services, 2025 - Para 1.10.2 - Chapter 1Para 1.11Manual for Procurement of Consultancy Services, 2025 - Para 1.11 - Chapter 1Para 1.13Manual for Procurement of Consultancy Services, 2025 - Para 1.13 - Chapter 1

Need help understanding this rule?

Ask Niti — your AI assistant for Consultancy Manual and other government rules