Para 8.2.7 - CEC Recommendations | KartavyaDesk
Original Rule Text
8.2.8 Recommendations/ Report 1. The CEC must make formal recommendations (Annexure 6) for the award of the contract to the bidder whose bid has been determined to be substantially responsive and the lowest evaluated bid, provided further that the bidder is determined to be qualified to perform the contract satisfactorily and his credentials have been verified. It is a good practice that CEC should spell out salient terms and conditions of the offer(s) recommended for acceptance. It should also be ensured by the CEC that any deviation/variation quoted by the consultant in his bid are not left undiscussed and ruled upon in the CEC; otherwise, there may be delay in acceptance of the contract by the consultant. These recommendations are submitted for approval to the tender accepting authority. Since a nominee of Financial Adviser of the Department is usually a member of the Tender Committee, there is no need for the CA to consult the FA of the Department before accepting the CEC recommendations. In any purchase decision, the responsibility of the CA is not discharged merely by selecting the cheapest offer or accepting CEC recommendations, but ensuring whether:
What This Means
Para 8.2.7 of the Manual for Procurement of Consultancy Services outlines the responsibilities of the Consultancy Evaluation Committee (CEC) when recommending a consultant for a project. After evaluating the bids, the CEC must formally recommend the bidder who submitted the lowest evaluated, substantially responsive bid, provided they are qualified and their credentials have been verified. This recommendation, using Annexure 6, is then submitted to the tender accepting authority for approval.
Crucially, the CEC needs to clearly state the important terms and conditions of the recommended offer. Any deviations or variations proposed by the consultant must be discussed and resolved within the CEC itself. This prevents delays later on. Since the Department's Financial Advisor is usually represented on the Tender Committee, the Contract Authority (CA) doesn't need to separately consult the FA before accepting the CEC's recommendations. However, the CA's responsibility goes beyond simply choosing the cheapest option or blindly accepting the CEC's recommendation; they must ensure the overall value and suitability of the chosen consultant.
In essence, this rule ensures a transparent and thorough evaluation process, preventing future complications and ensuring the best possible outcome for the government project. It emphasizes the CEC's role in not only identifying the lowest bidder but also ensuring their suitability and addressing any potential issues upfront.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Key Points
- •CEC must formally recommend the lowest evaluated, substantially responsive, and qualified bidder.
- •The recommendation must include salient terms and conditions of the offer.
- •Any deviations/variations quoted by the consultant must be discussed and ruled upon by the CEC.
- •The CA doesn't need to consult the FA separately if the FA is on the Tender Committee.
- •The CA's responsibility extends beyond accepting the cheapest offer; they must ensure overall value and suitability.
Practical Example
The Ministry of Urban Development is seeking a consultant for a smart city project. After evaluating several bids, the CEC determines that M/s TechSolutions has submitted the lowest evaluated bid and meets all qualification criteria. However, TechSolutions' bid includes a deviation regarding the payment schedule. The CEC thoroughly discusses this deviation and agrees to a modified payment schedule that is acceptable to both parties. This agreement is clearly documented in the CEC's recommendation to the tender accepting authority. The CA, Mr. Sharma, reviews the CEC's recommendation, including the agreed-upon payment schedule, and approves the contract award to TechSolutions. Mr. Sharma ensures that the modified payment schedule is beneficial for the project and doesn't compromise the Ministry's interests. This proactive approach prevents potential disputes later on.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Annexure 6?▼
If the Financial Advisor (FA) is on the Tender Committee, does the CA still need to consult the FA separately?▼
What happens if the consultant's bid contains deviations?▼
Is the CA's responsibility limited to selecting the cheapest offer?▼
What does 'substantially responsive' mean in the context of a bid?▼
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Test Your Knowledge
Question 1 of 3
According to Para 8.2.7 of the Manual for Procurement of Consultancy Services, which bidder should the Consultancy Evaluation Committee (CEC) formally recommend for contract award?
Related Rules
Need help understanding this rule?
Ask Niti — your AI assistant for Consultancy Manual and other government rules