Para 7.3.3 - Consultant Qualification | KartavyaDesk
Original Rule Text
7.3.3 Evaluation of Qualification 1. Procuring entity shall determine whether the Consultants are qualified and capable in all respects to be shortlisted to provide the ‘Services’. The Procuring Entity shall evaluate the consultants for shortlisting, inter-alia, based on their past experience of handling general and similar consultancy assignments, and financial capability of the firm. 2. The determination shall not consider the qualifications of other firms, such as the consultant's subsidiaries, parent entities, affiliates, or any other entity different from the consultant. Assignments completed by the Consultant’s individual experts working privately or through other consulting firms cannot be claimed as the relevant experience of the Consultant or that of the Consultant’s partners or sub-consultants. 3. The Procuring Entity reserves the right to waive minor deviations in the qualification criteria if they do not materially affect the capability of a Consultant to perform the contract. 4. The qualification and Experience of Key Experts are not included in the shortlisting criteria but shall be evaluated at the RFP stage. Since the bidders who meet the REoI qualification, can well manage to attract right Key experts during RfP. 5. In case a particular certification/ licence is required to perform the assignment, that may also be included in eligibility or qualification criteria. 6. Each criterion may be sub-divided into sub-criteria, if called for. Table 2 below gives an indicative criterion. The criteria and their weightage may be changed as per the need of Procuring Entity.
What This Means
Para 7.3.3 of the Manual for Procurement of Consultancy Services outlines how government agencies should evaluate the qualifications of consulting firms during the initial shortlisting phase. Essentially, it's about making sure the firms being considered have the necessary experience and financial stability to handle the project. The focus is solely on the consulting firm itself, not its parent company, subsidiaries, or individual experts' past work outside of the firm. This rule ensures a fair and transparent process, focusing on the firm's proven track record and financial health, allowing the procuring entity to select qualified candidates for the next stage.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Key Points
- •Evaluation focuses on the consulting firm's experience and financial capability.
- •Only the consultant's own past projects count, not those of its parent company, subsidiaries, or individual experts outside the firm.
- •Minor deviations in qualification criteria can be waived if they don't significantly impact the consultant's ability to perform.
- •Key experts' qualifications are evaluated later, during the Request for Proposal (RFP) stage.
- •Specific certifications or licenses required for the assignment can be included in the eligibility criteria.
Practical Example
The Ministry of Rural Development is seeking a consultant to advise on a new rural infrastructure project. Three firms, 'Sustainable Solutions Pvt. Ltd.', 'GreenTech Associates', and 'Global Innovations Inc.' apply. Sustainable Solutions highlights a similar project completed by their parent company, 'MegaCorp Holdings'. GreenTech Associates includes projects completed by their lead consultant, Dr. Sharma, when he worked at another firm. According to Para 7.3.3, the Ministry should disregard the project by MegaCorp Holdings and Dr. Sharma's previous work when evaluating Sustainable Solutions and GreenTech Associates. The evaluation should focus on Sustainable Solutions' and GreenTech Associates' directly relevant past experience and financial stability.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can we consider the experience of a consultant's subsidiary when evaluating their qualifications?▼
What if a consultant's past project is very similar but slightly deviates from the exact requirements?▼
When are the qualifications of the key experts evaluated?▼
Can we add a specific certification requirement to the eligibility criteria?▼
Can we change the weightage of the criteria mentioned in Table 2?▼
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Test Your Knowledge
Question 1 of 3
According to Para 7.3.3 of the Manual for Procurement of Consultancy Services, which of the following factors should a procuring entity primarily consider when evaluating a consultant for shortlisting?
Related Rules
Need help understanding this rule?
Ask Niti — your AI assistant for Consultancy Manual and other government rules