Para 10.7 - Dispute Resolution | KartavyaDesk
Original Rule Text
4. The aggrieved party shall give a ‘Notice of Dispute’ indicating the Dispute and claims citing relevant contractual clause to the designated authority and requesting for invoking the following dispute resolution mechanisms. The Dispute shall be attempted to be resolved without recourse to courts through dispute resolution mechanisms detailed subsequently, in the sequence as mentioned below, and the next mechanism shall not be invoked unless the earlier mechanism has been invoked or has failed to resolve it within the deadline mentioned therein. While processing a case for dispute resolution/litigation/arbitration, the procuring entity is to take legal advice, at appropriate stages.
What This Means
Para 10.7 of the Manual for Procurement of Consultancy Services outlines the process for resolving disputes that may arise between the government and a consultancy firm. If a disagreement occurs, the affected party (usually the consultancy firm) must first formally notify the designated authority within the government, clearly stating the issue, the specific contract clause violated, and a request to initiate dispute resolution. The rule emphasizes attempting to resolve disputes amicably, without immediately resorting to court. It mandates a step-by-step approach, using mechanisms like negotiation or mediation before considering more formal options like arbitration or litigation. The next step in the resolution process can only be initiated if the previous one has either been tried and failed or the specified deadline for resolution has passed.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Key Points
- •Aggrieved party must issue a 'Notice of Dispute' to the designated authority.
- •The notice must clearly state the dispute, relevant contractual clauses, and a request for dispute resolution.
- •Dispute resolution should be attempted through specified mechanisms before resorting to courts.
- •A sequential approach is mandated: earlier mechanisms must be exhausted before invoking later ones.
- •Procuring entity must seek legal advice at appropriate stages during dispute resolution.
Practical Example
Imagine the Ministry of Urban Development hired 'Shilpa Consultants' for a city planning project. A dispute arises over the interpretation of a clause related to payment milestones. Shilpa Consultants believes they've met the criteria for the second milestone payment of ₹50 lakhs, but the Ministry disagrees. According to Para 10.7, Shilpa Consultants must first send a 'Notice of Dispute' to the designated officer in the Ministry, clearly outlining the disputed clause, their claim, and requesting initiation of dispute resolution mechanisms. Only if negotiation or mediation fails within the stipulated timeframe can Shilpa Consultants proceed to the next stage, such as arbitration. The Ministry, meanwhile, must seek legal counsel to ensure its position is legally sound throughout the process.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Frequently Asked Questions
What constitutes a 'Notice of Dispute'?▼
What happens if the initial dispute resolution mechanism fails?▼
Does Para 10.7 prevent us from going to court?▼
Who is the 'designated authority' mentioned in the rule?▼
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Test Your Knowledge
Question 1 of 3
According to Para 10.7 of the Manual for Procurement of Consultancy Services, what is the first step an aggrieved party must take when a dispute arises?
Related Rules
Need help understanding this rule?
Ask Niti — your AI assistant for Consultancy Manual and other government rules