Para 10.7.2 - Contract Issues | KartavyaDesk
Original Rule Text
2. Issues related to the pre-award tender process or conditions. 3. Issues related to ambiguity in contract terms shall not be taken up after a contract has been signed. All such issues should be highlighted before the signing of the contract by the contractor. 4. Issues related to contractual action/ termination of contract etc., by the Procuring Entity on account of fraud, corruption, debarment of contractors, criminal or wilful negligence of the contractor etc. 5. Issues that are already under investigation by CBI, Vigilance, or any other investigating agency or government. 6. Provisions incorporated in the contract, which are beyond the purview of The Procurement Entity or are in pursuance of policies of Government, including but not limited to a) Provisions of restrictions regarding local content and Purchase Preference to Local suppliers in terms of Make in India policy of the Government. b) Provisions regarding restrictions on Entities from Countries having land-borders with India in terms of the Government’s policies in this regard. c) Purchase preference policies regarding MSEs and Start-ups
What This Means
Para 10.7.2 of the Manual for Procurement of Consultancy Services outlines specific types of issues that cannot be raised or revisited *after* a contract has been signed. Essentially, it emphasizes the importance of due diligence and addressing all concerns *before* formalizing the agreement. This rule aims to prevent disputes and ensure a smooth execution of the consultancy project by requiring all parties to be proactive in identifying and resolving potential problems upfront. It affects both the procuring entity (the government department) and the consultant, as both are bound by the terms of the signed contract and cannot easily renegotiate issues that should have been addressed earlier.
Specifically, this rule prevents revisiting issues related to the tender process, ambiguities in the contract, or issues already under investigation. It also covers provisions that are beyond the control of the procuring entity, such as those mandated by government policies like 'Make in India' or restrictions on entities from countries sharing land borders with India. By clearly defining these limitations, the rule promotes accountability and encourages thorough review of all aspects of the contract before it is finalized.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Key Points
- •Pre-award tender process issues cannot be raised after contract signing.
- •Ambiguities in contract terms must be clarified before signing.
- •Issues under investigation by CBI or other agencies cannot be taken up.
- •Government policy provisions (e.g., Make in India) are binding and not subject to post-contract negotiation.
- •Contractual actions related to fraud or negligence can still be pursued after signing.
Practical Example
The Ministry of Development awarded a consultancy contract to 'TechSolutions Pvt. Ltd.' for a smart city project. After the contract was signed, TechSolutions realized that the tender document was unclear about the specific data security standards required. They attempted to renegotiate this aspect, citing ambiguity. However, according to Para 10.7.2, this issue should have been raised *before* signing the contract. The Ministry, therefore, refused to renegotiate this point.
In another instance, during the project, it was discovered that TechSolutions had misrepresented their experience in a similar project. The Ministry initiated termination proceedings based on this fraudulent activity. Para 10.7.2 allows for such action, as it pertains to fraud, even after the contract is signed. The Ministry also discovered that TechSolutions was using components that did not meet the local content requirements stipulated under the 'Make in India' policy. This was also not negotiable, as the policy was a pre-existing government mandate.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if we discover a major flaw in the tender process *after* the contract is signed?▼
If a contract term is ambiguous, can we clarify it after signing?▼
Does Para 10.7.2 prevent us from taking action against a contractor for fraud?▼
What if a government policy changes *after* the contract is signed?▼
If an issue is already under investigation, can it be raised again during contract execution?▼
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Test Your Knowledge
Question 1 of 3
According to Para 10.7.2 of the Manual for Procurement of Consultancy Services, which of the following issues CANNOT be raised after a consultancy contract has been signed?
Related Rules
Need help understanding this rule?
Ask Niti — your AI assistant for Consultancy Manual and other government rules