Rule 52 - Re-employment Pay Fixation | KartavyaDesk
Original Rule Text
(i) before such re-employment, including permanent absorption or immediate absorption, he was not (ii) in accordance with the relevant rules or orders, his pay was fixed at the minimum of the scale of pay of the post in which he was so re-employed or absorbed and such minimum of the scale of pay was less than the pay which he was drawing immediately before his retirement or absorption; and (iii) while fixing his pay in the post in which he was so re-employed or absorbed, the entire amount of pension sanctioned by the Central Government was ignored.
What This Means
Rule 52 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 2021 deals with a specific situation regarding the pay fixation of a retired government employee who is re-employed or permanently absorbed into another government post. This rule applies when three conditions are met: first, the employee was not already re-employed or absorbed before; second, their pay in the new role was fixed at the minimum of the pay scale, and this minimum was less than their previous pay; and third, when fixing their pay in the new role, the government completely disregarded their pension amount. Essentially, it aims to prevent a situation where a re-employed pensioner is unfairly disadvantaged in terms of pay compared to their pre-retirement earnings, especially when their pension wasn't considered during pay fixation.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Key Points
- •Applies to re-employed or permanently absorbed pensioners.
- •Pay in the new role must be fixed at the minimum of the pay scale.
- •The minimum pay scale must be less than the pre-retirement pay.
- •The entire pension amount must have been ignored during pay fixation in the new role.
- •Aims to prevent financial disadvantage for re-employed pensioners.
Practical Example
Mr. Sharma retired as a Section Officer with a last drawn pay of ₹70,000. After retirement, he was re-employed as an Assistant in another department. According to the rules, his pay was fixed at the minimum of the Assistant's pay scale, which was ₹45,000. During this pay fixation, the department completely ignored his pension of ₹30,000. Rule 52 would be applicable in this case because Mr. Sharma's pay in the new role is less than his pre-retirement pay, and his pension was not considered when fixing his pay. This rule ensures that Mr. Sharma's case is reviewed to ensure he is not unfairly disadvantaged.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Rule 52 apply if my pay in the re-employment is higher than my last drawn pay?▼
What does 'entire amount of pension sanctioned' mean?▼
If only part of my pension was ignored during pay fixation, does Rule 52 apply?▼
Is Rule 52 applicable if I was absorbed into a PSU after retirement?▼
What is the purpose of Rule 52?▼
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Test Your Knowledge
Question 1 of 3
According to Rule 52 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 2021, which of the following conditions must be met for the rule to apply regarding pay fixation of a re-employed pensioner?
Related Rules
Need help understanding this rule?
Ask Niti — your AI assistant for CCS Pension and other government rules