Para 2.8 — CAM
Original Rule Text
2.8 SCRUTINY OF DISTRIBUTION OF GRANT APPROPRIATIONs CHECK OF REAPPROPRIATION ORDERS AND SCRUTINY WITH REFERENCE TO GUIDELINES ON NEW SERVICE/ NEW INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE
2.8.1 While scrutinizing orders relating to allotment and re-appropriation of funds, provisions of Rules contained in Rule No. 55 and 56 of the GFR, 2017 and Rules 7 to 10 of the compilation of DFPR,1978, as amended from time to time, may be kept in view. It may also be checked whether relevant orders are issued by the competent authority and that the total of the allotments among various controlling and disbursing officers does not exceed the funds duly provided under the relevant head and further that re-appropriation orders are free from arithmetical inaccuracies etc. and contain full reasons for the re-appropriations.
2.8.2 Ministry of Finance (Department of Economic Affairs) O.M. No.F.1(22)-B(AC)/2022 dated 23 rd February,2024 (APPENDIX 2.2) and subsequent OMs from time to time containing guidelines on NS/NIS may be kept in view while exercising check on budget availability during pre-check of bills.
2.9 CHECK OF SANCTIONS FOR EXPENDITURE
2.9.1 Under Article 53 of the Constitution, the executive power of the Union vests in the President and is exercised by him either directly or through officers subordinate to him in accordance with the Constitution. Article 77 of the Constitution requires that all executive action of the Government of India should be expressed to be taken in the name of the President and that orders and other instruments made and executed in the name of President should be authenticated in such manner as may be specified in rules made by the President. The rules made by the President for the authentication of orders in the name of the President are contained in the Authentication (orders & other instruments) Rules, 1958. The extent and conditions of delegation of financial powers to different authorities are contained in the Delegation of Financial Powers Rules, as amended from time to time.
2.9.2 The responsibilities of the PAO in regard to check of sanctions are as detailed in subsequent sections.
2.9.3 The sanction should conform to the relevant provisions of the Act and of the Laws and Rules made there under and should be in accordance with the financial rules, regulations and orders issued by a competent authority or by virtue of powers formally delegated to it by a higher authority. The rules, regulations and orders against which check is conducted, mainly fall under the following categories -
(i) rules and orders regulating the powers to incur and sanction expenditure from the CFI and the Contingency Fund of India;
What This Means
This para covers how PAOs scrutinize budget allotment orders, re-appropriation orders, and expenditure sanctions. For allotment and re-appropriation, PAOs verify that orders come from competent authorities, that total allotments do not exceed the funds under the relevant head, and that re-appropriations are arithmetically correct with full reasons stated. For expenditure sanctions, the PAO checks that they conform to the Constitution, Delegation of Financial Powers Rules, and applicable service rules. If the PAO has concerns about financial propriety, they can request additional details from the departmental officer, and if still unsatisfied, escalate through the CA/CCA/Pr.CCA to the Financial Advisor. Sanctions above Rs 50 lakh must be reviewed by Deputy CAs, and those above Rs 5 crore by CAs, with review completed within two working days in parallel with bill processing.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Key Points
- 1Re-appropriation orders must come from competent authority, be arithmetically accurate, and contain full reasons
- 2Total allotments among officers must not exceed funds provided under the relevant head of account
- 3PAOs check expenditure sanctions against the Constitution, DFPR, and applicable service rules
- 4If financial propriety is doubtful, PAO can seek additional details and escalate to CA/CCA/Pr.CCA and then to the Financial Advisor
- 5High-value sanction review thresholds: above Rs 50 lakh by Dy. CA, above Rs 5 crore by CA, completed within 2 working days in parallel with bill processing
Practical Example
A Ministry issues a sanction for Rs 3 crore for a new IT system. The PAO receives the sanction, verifies that the sanctioning authority has the delegated financial power for this amount under DFPR, checks that the expenditure is covered under the correct budget head, and since the amount exceeds Rs 50 lakh, forwards it to the Deputy CA for review. The Dy. CA reviews the sanction within two working days. Meanwhile, the PAO processes the bill in parallel so that once the review is complete, payment can proceed without delay. If the Dy. CA flags any propriety concern, the case is escalated to the Financial Advisor for guidance.
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the review threshold for high-value sanctions?▼
Can a PAO refuse to pass a bill on grounds of financial propriety?▼
How quickly must high-value sanctions be reviewed?▼
This explanation was generated with AI assistance for educational purposes. Always refer to the official gazette notification for authoritative text.