KartavyaDesk
news

Why has India not been able to develop a robust seismic preparedness strategy despite being located in an active tectonic zone? Identify the key gaps in disaster risk reduction.

Kartavya Desk Staff

Topic: Disaster and disaster management.

Topic: Disaster and disaster management.

Q6. Why has India not been able to develop a robust seismic preparedness strategy despite being located in an active tectonic zone? Identify the key gaps in disaster risk reduction. (10 M)

Difficulty Level: Medium

Reference: TH

Why the question India must shake itself out of its perilous innocence and be prepared for the reality beneath the earth’s crust Key demand of the question The question requires an analysis of why India has not been able to develop a robust seismic preparedness strategy despite being in an active tectonic zone. It also demands identification of key gaps in disaster risk reduction that contribute to this vulnerability. Structure of the Answer Introduction: Mention India’s high seismic risk due to its tectonic positioning and highlight the lack of a comprehensive seismic preparedness strategy. Body: Reasons for weak seismic preparedness – Discuss the issues related to poor enforcement of building codes, lack of early warning systems, inadequate public awareness, infrastructure vulnerabilities, and insufficient investment in seismic research. Key gaps in disaster risk reduction – Identify challenges such as weak regulatory frameworks, lack of earthquake insurance, reliance on reactive policies, limited regional cooperation, and minimal community participation. Conclusion: Emphasize the need for a shift from reactive to proactive disaster management, integrating scientific advancements, strict enforcement of policies, and community-driven resilience strategies.

Why the question

India must shake itself out of its perilous innocence and be prepared for the reality beneath the earth’s crust

Key demand of the question

The question requires an analysis of why India has not been able to develop a robust seismic preparedness strategy despite being in an active tectonic zone. It also demands identification of key gaps in disaster risk reduction that contribute to this vulnerability.

Structure of the Answer

Introduction: Mention India’s high seismic risk due to its tectonic positioning and highlight the lack of a comprehensive seismic preparedness strategy.

Reasons for weak seismic preparedness – Discuss the issues related to poor enforcement of building codes, lack of early warning systems, inadequate public awareness, infrastructure vulnerabilities, and insufficient investment in seismic research.

Key gaps in disaster risk reduction – Identify challenges such as weak regulatory frameworks, lack of earthquake insurance, reliance on reactive policies, limited regional cooperation, and minimal community participation.

Conclusion: Emphasize the need for a shift from reactive to proactive disaster management, integrating scientific advancements, strict enforcement of policies, and community-driven resilience strategies.

AI-assisted content, editorially reviewed by Kartavya Desk Staff.

About Kartavya Desk Staff

Articles in our archive published before our editorial team was expanded. Legacy content is periodically reviewed and updated by our current editors.

All News