UPSC Static Quiz – Modern India : 29 August 2024
Kartavya Desk Staff
Why Participate in the UPSC Static Quiz?
Participating in daily quizzes helps reinforce your knowledge and identify areas that need improvement. Regular practice will enhance your recall abilities and boost your confidence for the examination. By covering various topics throughout the week, you ensure a comprehensive revision of the syllabus.
#### Quiz-summary
0 of 5 questions completed
Questions:
#### Information
Best of Luck! 🙂
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
0 of 5 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)
#### Categories
• Not categorized 0%
• Question 1 of 5 1. Question Which of the following statements about the Indian Councils Act of 1909 is/are correct? It increased the size of the legislative councils at both the Central and provincial levels. It introduced the concept of separate electorates for Muslims, thereby initiating communal representation in India. It allowed for a non-official majority in the Central Legislative Council. Select the correct answer code: a) 1 and 2 only b) 2 and 3 only c) 1 and 3 only d) 1, 2, and 3 Correct Solution: a) The Indian Councils Act of 1909, also known as the Morley-Minto Reforms, made several significant changes to the legislative councils in India. Firstly, it considerably increased the size of both the Central and provincial legislative councils, with the number of members in the Central Legislative Council being raised from 16 to 60. Secondly, the Act introduced the concept of separate electorates for Muslims, which was a critical step in the institutionalization of communalism in Indian politics. However, the Act retained the official majority in the Central Legislative Council, meaning that elected Indian members were still in the minority, although it did allow a non-official majority in provincial legislative councils. Therefore, statement 3 is incorrect, making option (a) the correct solution. Incorrect Solution: a) The Indian Councils Act of 1909, also known as the Morley-Minto Reforms, made several significant changes to the legislative councils in India. Firstly, it considerably increased the size of both the Central and provincial legislative councils, with the number of members in the Central Legislative Council being raised from 16 to 60. Secondly, the Act introduced the concept of separate electorates for Muslims, which was a critical step in the institutionalization of communalism in Indian politics. However, the Act retained the official majority in the Central Legislative Council, meaning that elected Indian members were still in the minority, although it did allow a non-official majority in provincial legislative councils. Therefore, statement 3 is incorrect, making option (a) the correct solution.
#### 1. Question
Which of the following statements about the Indian Councils Act of 1909 is/are correct?
• It increased the size of the legislative councils at both the Central and provincial levels.
• It introduced the concept of separate electorates for Muslims, thereby initiating communal representation in India.
• It allowed for a non-official majority in the Central Legislative Council.
Select the correct answer code:
• a) 1 and 2 only
• b) 2 and 3 only
• c) 1 and 3 only
• d) 1, 2, and 3
Solution: a)
• The Indian Councils Act of 1909, also known as the Morley-Minto Reforms, made several significant changes to the legislative councils in India.
• Firstly, it considerably increased the size of both the Central and provincial legislative councils, with the number of members in the Central Legislative Council being raised from 16 to 60.
• Secondly, the Act introduced the concept of separate electorates for Muslims, which was a critical step in the institutionalization of communalism in Indian politics.
• However, the Act retained the official majority in the Central Legislative Council, meaning that elected Indian members were still in the minority, although it did allow a non-official majority in provincial legislative councils.
• Therefore, statement 3 is incorrect, making option (a) the correct solution.
Solution: a)
• The Indian Councils Act of 1909, also known as the Morley-Minto Reforms, made several significant changes to the legislative councils in India.
• Firstly, it considerably increased the size of both the Central and provincial legislative councils, with the number of members in the Central Legislative Council being raised from 16 to 60.
• Secondly, the Act introduced the concept of separate electorates for Muslims, which was a critical step in the institutionalization of communalism in Indian politics.
• However, the Act retained the official majority in the Central Legislative Council, meaning that elected Indian members were still in the minority, although it did allow a non-official majority in provincial legislative councils.
• Therefore, statement 3 is incorrect, making option (a) the correct solution.
• Question 2 of 5 2. Question Which of the following statements about the Home Rule Movement in India is correct? a) It was initiated as a direct response to the Jallianwala Bagh massacre. b) The movement aimed to achieve immediate independence from British rule. c) It sought self-government for India within the British Empire. d) The Home Rule Leagues were exclusively led by extremist leaders. Correct Solution: c) The Home Rule Movement, launched during World War I, was aimed at achieving self-government for India within the British Empire rather than immediate independence. The movement, inspired by the Irish Home Rule Movement, sought to educate and politically mobilize Indians for self-rule. Led by Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Annie Besant, the movement represented a new, more assertive phase in Indian politics. It was neither a reaction to the Jallianwala Bagh massacre (which occurred later in 1919) nor an extremist-only initiative; it united moderates, extremists, and even members of the Muslim League. The correct answer is (c) as the movement aimed at self-government, not immediate independence. Incorrect Solution: c) The Home Rule Movement, launched during World War I, was aimed at achieving self-government for India within the British Empire rather than immediate independence. The movement, inspired by the Irish Home Rule Movement, sought to educate and politically mobilize Indians for self-rule. Led by Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Annie Besant, the movement represented a new, more assertive phase in Indian politics. It was neither a reaction to the Jallianwala Bagh massacre (which occurred later in 1919) nor an extremist-only initiative; it united moderates, extremists, and even members of the Muslim League. The correct answer is (c) as the movement aimed at self-government, not immediate independence.
#### 2. Question
Which of the following statements about the Home Rule Movement in India is correct?
• a) It was initiated as a direct response to the Jallianwala Bagh massacre.
• b) The movement aimed to achieve immediate independence from British rule.
• c) It sought self-government for India within the British Empire.
• d) The Home Rule Leagues were exclusively led by extremist leaders.
Solution: c)
• The Home Rule Movement, launched during World War I, was aimed at achieving self-government for India within the British Empire rather than immediate independence.
• The movement, inspired by the Irish Home Rule Movement, sought to educate and politically mobilize Indians for self-rule. Led by Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Annie Besant, the movement represented a new, more assertive phase in Indian politics.
• It was neither a reaction to the Jallianwala Bagh massacre (which occurred later in 1919) nor an extremist-only initiative; it united moderates, extremists, and even members of the Muslim League.
• The correct answer is (c) as the movement aimed at self-government, not immediate independence.
Solution: c)
• The Home Rule Movement, launched during World War I, was aimed at achieving self-government for India within the British Empire rather than immediate independence.
• The movement, inspired by the Irish Home Rule Movement, sought to educate and politically mobilize Indians for self-rule. Led by Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Annie Besant, the movement represented a new, more assertive phase in Indian politics.
• It was neither a reaction to the Jallianwala Bagh massacre (which occurred later in 1919) nor an extremist-only initiative; it united moderates, extremists, and even members of the Muslim League.
• The correct answer is (c) as the movement aimed at self-government, not immediate independence.
• Question 3 of 5 3. Question Consider the following statements regarding the Surat Split of 1907: The split occurred due to differences between moderates and extremists within the Indian National Congress over resolutions like Swaraj, Swadeshi, and Boycott. The British utilized the split to suppress the Extremists by launching a massive crackdown, including the imprisonment of Lokmanya Tilak. The Surat Split strengthened the Indian National Congress by allowing it to focus on more moderate, achievable goals. How many of the above statements is/are correct? a) Only one b) Only two c) All three d) None Correct Solution: b) Statement 3 is incorrect. The Surat Split in 1907 was a significant event in the history of the Indian National Congress. The split occurred primarily due to ideological differences between the Moderates, who favored a gradual approach through constitutional means, and the Extremists, who advocated for more radical actions such as Swaraj (self-rule), Swadeshi (promotion of indigenous goods), Boycott of foreign goods, and National Education. The British exploited this division through their “divide and rule” policy, suppressing the Extremists who were seen as a more immediate threat to their rule. Lokmanya Tilak, a prominent Extremist leader, was imprisoned and sent to Mandalay, which significantly weakened the Extremist faction. Contrary to statement 3, the split did not strengthen the Congress but rather led to a period of decline and division within the party, with the Moderates losing touch with the younger generation of nationalists. Incorrect Solution: b) Statement 3 is incorrect. The Surat Split in 1907 was a significant event in the history of the Indian National Congress. The split occurred primarily due to ideological differences between the Moderates, who favored a gradual approach through constitutional means, and the Extremists, who advocated for more radical actions such as Swaraj (self-rule), Swadeshi (promotion of indigenous goods), Boycott of foreign goods, and National Education. The British exploited this division through their “divide and rule” policy, suppressing the Extremists who were seen as a more immediate threat to their rule. Lokmanya Tilak, a prominent Extremist leader, was imprisoned and sent to Mandalay, which significantly weakened the Extremist faction. Contrary to statement 3, the split did not strengthen the Congress but rather led to a period of decline and division within the party, with the Moderates losing touch with the younger generation of nationalists.
#### 3. Question
Consider the following statements regarding the Surat Split of 1907:
• The split occurred due to differences between moderates and extremists within the Indian National Congress over resolutions like Swaraj, Swadeshi, and Boycott.
• The British utilized the split to suppress the Extremists by launching a massive crackdown, including the imprisonment of Lokmanya Tilak.
• The Surat Split strengthened the Indian National Congress by allowing it to focus on more moderate, achievable goals.
How many of the above statements is/are correct?
• a) Only one
• b) Only two
• c) All three
Solution: b)
Statement 3 is incorrect.
• The Surat Split in 1907 was a significant event in the history of the Indian National Congress.
• The split occurred primarily due to ideological differences between the Moderates, who favored a gradual approach through constitutional means, and the Extremists, who advocated for more radical actions such as Swaraj (self-rule), Swadeshi (promotion of indigenous goods), Boycott of foreign goods, and National Education.
• The British exploited this division through their “divide and rule” policy, suppressing the Extremists who were seen as a more immediate threat to their rule.
• Lokmanya Tilak, a prominent Extremist leader, was imprisoned and sent to Mandalay, which significantly weakened the Extremist faction.
• Contrary to statement 3, the split did not strengthen the Congress but rather led to a period of decline and division within the party, with the Moderates losing touch with the younger generation of nationalists.
Solution: b)
Statement 3 is incorrect.
• The Surat Split in 1907 was a significant event in the history of the Indian National Congress.
• The split occurred primarily due to ideological differences between the Moderates, who favored a gradual approach through constitutional means, and the Extremists, who advocated for more radical actions such as Swaraj (self-rule), Swadeshi (promotion of indigenous goods), Boycott of foreign goods, and National Education.
• The British exploited this division through their “divide and rule” policy, suppressing the Extremists who were seen as a more immediate threat to their rule.
• Lokmanya Tilak, a prominent Extremist leader, was imprisoned and sent to Mandalay, which significantly weakened the Extremist faction.
• Contrary to statement 3, the split did not strengthen the Congress but rather led to a period of decline and division within the party, with the Moderates losing touch with the younger generation of nationalists.
• Question 4 of 5 4. Question Consider the following statements regarding the Komagata Maru incident: The Komagata Maru was a cargo ship involved in trade between India and Canada that was accidentally caught up in an immigration dispute. The Komagata Maru’s passengers were denied entry into Canada due to immigration laws that targeted Asian immigrants. A strong protest movement in Canada, supported by the Canadian government, successfully allowed the passengers to disembark. Which of the above statements is/are correct? a) 1 only b) 2 only c) 1 and 3 only d) 2 and 3 only Correct Solution: b) The Komagata Maru incident is a stark example of the discriminatory immigration policies in early 20th century Canada. The ship, carrying 376 passengers, mainly Sikhs from India, was denied entry into Canada due to laws explicitly designed to curb Asian immigration. The “continuous journey” regulation was crafted to prevent immigrants from making stops en route to Canada, a near-impossible feat for those traveling from India. The first statement is incorrect as the Komagata Maru was not a cargo ship involved in trade, but a passenger ship. The third statement is also incorrect; although there was a protest movement led by local activists in Canada and the USA, the Canadian government did not support the passengers’ cause, and ultimately, the ship was forced to leave without any passengers disembarking. Thus, only statement 2 is correct. Incorrect Solution: b) The Komagata Maru incident is a stark example of the discriminatory immigration policies in early 20th century Canada. The ship, carrying 376 passengers, mainly Sikhs from India, was denied entry into Canada due to laws explicitly designed to curb Asian immigration. The “continuous journey” regulation was crafted to prevent immigrants from making stops en route to Canada, a near-impossible feat for those traveling from India. The first statement is incorrect as the Komagata Maru was not a cargo ship involved in trade, but a passenger ship. The third statement is also incorrect; although there was a protest movement led by local activists in Canada and the USA, the Canadian government did not support the passengers’ cause, and ultimately, the ship was forced to leave without any passengers disembarking. Thus, only statement 2 is correct.
#### 4. Question
Consider the following statements regarding the Komagata Maru incident:
• The Komagata Maru was a cargo ship involved in trade between India and Canada that was accidentally caught up in an immigration dispute.
• The Komagata Maru’s passengers were denied entry into Canada due to immigration laws that targeted Asian immigrants.
• A strong protest movement in Canada, supported by the Canadian government, successfully allowed the passengers to disembark.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
• c) 1 and 3 only
• d) 2 and 3 only
Solution: b)
• The Komagata Maru incident is a stark example of the discriminatory immigration policies in early 20th century Canada.
• The ship, carrying 376 passengers, mainly Sikhs from India, was denied entry into Canada due to laws explicitly designed to curb Asian immigration.
• The “continuous journey” regulation was crafted to prevent immigrants from making stops en route to Canada, a near-impossible feat for those traveling from India.
• The first statement is incorrect as the Komagata Maru was not a cargo ship involved in trade, but a passenger ship.
• The third statement is also incorrect; although there was a protest movement led by local activists in Canada and the USA, the Canadian government did not support the passengers’ cause, and ultimately, the ship was forced to leave without any passengers disembarking. Thus, only statement 2 is correct.
Solution: b)
• The Komagata Maru incident is a stark example of the discriminatory immigration policies in early 20th century Canada.
• The ship, carrying 376 passengers, mainly Sikhs from India, was denied entry into Canada due to laws explicitly designed to curb Asian immigration.
• The “continuous journey” regulation was crafted to prevent immigrants from making stops en route to Canada, a near-impossible feat for those traveling from India.
• The first statement is incorrect as the Komagata Maru was not a cargo ship involved in trade, but a passenger ship.
• The third statement is also incorrect; although there was a protest movement led by local activists in Canada and the USA, the Canadian government did not support the passengers’ cause, and ultimately, the ship was forced to leave without any passengers disembarking. Thus, only statement 2 is correct.
• Question 5 of 5 5. Question Consider the following statements about the Home Rule Movement in India: The movement was inspired by the Irish Home Rule Leagues and sought self-government for India. The Home Rule Leagues operated throughout the year, unlike the Congress Party, which held activities only once a year. The movement remained confined to the Bombay and Madras presidencies and failed to spread to other regions. Which of the above statements is/are correct? a) 1 and 2 only b) 2 and 3 only c) 1 and 3 only d) 1, 2, and 3 Correct Solution: a) The Home Rule Movement in India, inspired by the Irish Home Rule Leagues, aimed at self-government and was a more assertive response to British rule during World War I. The movement led by Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Annie Besant was distinguished by its year-round activity, which contrasted with the Congress Party’s annual sessions. It did not remain confined to just the Bombay and Madras presidencies but spread political consciousness across various regions in India, even attracting the support of moderates, extremists, and members of the Muslim League. Therefore, statement 3 is incorrect, making option (a) the correct answer. Incorrect Solution: a) The Home Rule Movement in India, inspired by the Irish Home Rule Leagues, aimed at self-government and was a more assertive response to British rule during World War I. The movement led by Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Annie Besant was distinguished by its year-round activity, which contrasted with the Congress Party’s annual sessions. It did not remain confined to just the Bombay and Madras presidencies but spread political consciousness across various regions in India, even attracting the support of moderates, extremists, and members of the Muslim League. Therefore, statement 3 is incorrect, making option (a) the correct answer.
#### 5. Question
Consider the following statements about the Home Rule Movement in India:
• The movement was inspired by the Irish Home Rule Leagues and sought self-government for India.
• The Home Rule Leagues operated throughout the year, unlike the Congress Party, which held activities only once a year.
• The movement remained confined to the Bombay and Madras presidencies and failed to spread to other regions.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
• a) 1 and 2 only
• b) 2 and 3 only
• c) 1 and 3 only
• d) 1, 2, and 3
Solution: a)
The Home Rule Movement in India, inspired by the Irish Home Rule Leagues, aimed at self-government and was a more assertive response to British rule during World War I. The movement led by Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Annie Besant was distinguished by its year-round activity, which contrasted with the Congress Party’s annual sessions. It did not remain confined to just the Bombay and Madras presidencies but spread political consciousness across various regions in India, even attracting the support of moderates, extremists, and members of the Muslim League. Therefore, statement 3 is incorrect, making option (a) the correct answer.
Solution: a)
The Home Rule Movement in India, inspired by the Irish Home Rule Leagues, aimed at self-government and was a more assertive response to British rule during World War I. The movement led by Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Annie Besant was distinguished by its year-round activity, which contrasted with the Congress Party’s annual sessions. It did not remain confined to just the Bombay and Madras presidencies but spread political consciousness across various regions in India, even attracting the support of moderates, extremists, and members of the Muslim League. Therefore, statement 3 is incorrect, making option (a) the correct answer.
Join our Official Telegram Channel HERE for Motivation and Fast Updates
Join our Twitter Channel HERE
Follow our Instagram Channel HERE
Stay Consistent
Consistency is key in UPSC preparation. By making the UPSC Static Quiz a part of your daily routine, you will steadily improve your knowledge base and exam readiness. Join us every day to tackle new questions and make your journey towards UPSC success more structured and effective.