KartavyaDesk
news

UPSC Static Quiz – History : 8 January 2025

Kartavya Desk Staff

UPSC Static Quiz – History : 8 January 2025 We will post 5 questions daily on static topics mentioned in the UPSC civil services preliminary examination syllabus. Each week will focus on a specific topic from the syllabus, such as History of India and Indian National Movement, Indian and World Geography, and more.We are excited to bring you our daily UPSC Static Quiz, designed to help you prepare for the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination. Each day, we will post 5 questions on static topics mentioned in the UPSC syllabus. This week, we are focusing on Indian and World Geography.

Why Participate in the UPSC Static Quiz?

Participating in daily quizzes helps reinforce your knowledge and identify areas that need improvement. Regular practice will enhance your recall abilities and boost your confidence for the examination. By covering various topics throughout the week, you ensure a comprehensive revision of the syllabus.

#### Quiz-summary

0 of 5 questions completed

Questions:

#### Information

Best of Luck! 🙂

You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.

Quiz is loading...

You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.

You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:

0 of 5 questions answered correctly

Your time:

Time has elapsed

You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)

#### Categories

• Not categorized 0%

• Question 1 of 5 1. Question With reference to the Regulating Act of 1773, consider the following statements: It was the first British parliamentary act to regulate the affairs of the East India Company in India. It established a Supreme Court at Calcutta. It subordinated the Governors of Bombay and Madras to the Governor-General of Bengal. Which of the statements given above are correct? a) 1 and 2 only b) 2 and 3 only c) 1 and 3 only d) 1, 2, and 3 Correct Solution: d) The Regulating Act of 1773 was a significant step by the British Parliament to control and regulate the affairs of the East India Company in India, recognizing that the Company had administrative and political roles beyond trade. It marked the beginning of parliamentary control over the Company’s activities in India. Additionally, the Act led to the establishment of a Supreme Court at Calcutta (Fort William) in 1774, which was intended to administer justice to Europeans, their employees, and those connected with them. Furthermore, the Act made a provision that the Governors of Bombay and Madras were to be subordinate to the Governor-General of Bengal. This centralization aimed to create a more unified and efficient administration under the Governor-General in Council. Incorrect Solution: d) The Regulating Act of 1773 was a significant step by the British Parliament to control and regulate the affairs of the East India Company in India, recognizing that the Company had administrative and political roles beyond trade. It marked the beginning of parliamentary control over the Company’s activities in India. Additionally, the Act led to the establishment of a Supreme Court at Calcutta (Fort William) in 1774, which was intended to administer justice to Europeans, their employees, and those connected with them. Furthermore, the Act made a provision that the Governors of Bombay and Madras were to be subordinate to the Governor-General of Bengal. This centralization aimed to create a more unified and efficient administration under the Governor-General in Council.

#### 1. Question

With reference to the Regulating Act of 1773, consider the following statements:

• It was the first British parliamentary act to regulate the affairs of the East India Company in India.

• It established a Supreme Court at Calcutta.

• It subordinated the Governors of Bombay and Madras to the Governor-General of Bengal.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

• a) 1 and 2 only

• b) 2 and 3 only

• c) 1 and 3 only

• d) 1, 2, and 3

Solution: d)

• The Regulating Act of 1773 was a significant step by the British Parliament to control and regulate the affairs of the East India Company in India, recognizing that the Company had administrative and political roles beyond trade. It marked the beginning of parliamentary control over the Company’s activities in India.

• Additionally, the Act led to the establishment of a Supreme Court at Calcutta (Fort William) in 1774, which was intended to administer justice to Europeans, their employees, and those connected with them.

Furthermore, the Act made a provision that the Governors of Bombay and Madras were to be subordinate to the Governor-General of Bengal. This centralization aimed to create a more unified and efficient administration under the Governor-General in Council.

Solution: d)

• The Regulating Act of 1773 was a significant step by the British Parliament to control and regulate the affairs of the East India Company in India, recognizing that the Company had administrative and political roles beyond trade. It marked the beginning of parliamentary control over the Company’s activities in India.

• Additionally, the Act led to the establishment of a Supreme Court at Calcutta (Fort William) in 1774, which was intended to administer justice to Europeans, their employees, and those connected with them.

Furthermore, the Act made a provision that the Governors of Bombay and Madras were to be subordinate to the Governor-General of Bengal. This centralization aimed to create a more unified and efficient administration under the Governor-General in Council.

• Question 2 of 5 2. Question Consider the following leaders and their role during the Extremist Phase of the Indian National Movement: Bal Gangadhar Tilak Lala Lajpat Rai Bipin Chandra Pal Which of the following statements is/are correct? a) All three leaders were part of the Extremist faction within the Indian National Congress. b) Tilak was the first to advocate for Swaraj (self-rule). c) Lala Lajpat Rai opposed the partition of Bengal in 1905 through passive resistance. d) All the above statements are correct. Correct Solution: d) Tilak, Lala Lajpat Rai, and Bipin Chandra Pal were the three prominent leaders of the Extremist faction, often referred to as the Lal-Bal-Pal trio. Tilak popularized the demand for Swaraj and coined the slogan “Swaraj is my birthright, and I shall have it”. Lala Lajpat Rai played a significant role in opposing the partition of Bengal in 1905, advocating passive resistance and mass mobilization. Incorrect Solution: d) Tilak, Lala Lajpat Rai, and Bipin Chandra Pal were the three prominent leaders of the Extremist faction, often referred to as the Lal-Bal-Pal trio. Tilak popularized the demand for Swaraj and coined the slogan “Swaraj is my birthright, and I shall have it”. Lala Lajpat Rai played a significant role in opposing the partition of Bengal in 1905, advocating passive resistance and mass mobilization.

#### 2. Question

Consider the following leaders and their role during the Extremist Phase of the Indian National Movement:

• Bal Gangadhar Tilak

• Lala Lajpat Rai

• Bipin Chandra Pal

Which of the following statements is/are correct?

• a) All three leaders were part of the Extremist faction within the Indian National Congress.

• b) Tilak was the first to advocate for Swaraj (self-rule).

• c) Lala Lajpat Rai opposed the partition of Bengal in 1905 through passive resistance.

• d) All the above statements are correct.

Solution: d)

• Tilak, Lala Lajpat Rai, and Bipin Chandra Pal were the three prominent leaders of the Extremist faction, often referred to as the Lal-Bal-Pal trio.

• Tilak popularized the demand for Swaraj and coined the slogan “Swaraj is my birthright, and I shall have it”.

• Lala Lajpat Rai played a significant role in opposing the partition of Bengal in 1905, advocating passive resistance and mass mobilization.

Solution: d)

• Tilak, Lala Lajpat Rai, and Bipin Chandra Pal were the three prominent leaders of the Extremist faction, often referred to as the Lal-Bal-Pal trio.

• Tilak popularized the demand for Swaraj and coined the slogan “Swaraj is my birthright, and I shall have it”.

• Lala Lajpat Rai played a significant role in opposing the partition of Bengal in 1905, advocating passive resistance and mass mobilization.

• Question 3 of 5 3. Question Consider the following statements: Statement-I: The Surat Split in 1907 weakened the national movement temporarily. Statement-II: The differences between the Moderates and Extremists were resolved immediately after the Surat session, leading to a united struggle. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements? a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I b) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I c) Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect d) Statement-l is incorrect but Statement-II is correct Correct Solution: c) The Surat Split in 1907 indeed weakened the national movement temporarily. The split between the Moderates and Extremists caused disunity within the Indian National Congress, slowing down the momentum of the struggle for independence. The differences between the Moderates and Extremists were not resolved immediately after the Surat session. It took almost a decade for the two factions to reconcile. They reunited only in 1916, with the Lucknow Pact, where both factions agreed to cooperate against British rule. Incorrect Solution: c) The Surat Split in 1907 indeed weakened the national movement temporarily. The split between the Moderates and Extremists caused disunity within the Indian National Congress, slowing down the momentum of the struggle for independence. The differences between the Moderates and Extremists were not resolved immediately after the Surat session. It took almost a decade for the two factions to reconcile. They reunited only in 1916, with the Lucknow Pact, where both factions agreed to cooperate against British rule.

#### 3. Question

Consider the following statements:

Statement-I: The Surat Split in 1907 weakened the national movement temporarily. Statement-II: The differences between the Moderates and Extremists were resolved immediately after the Surat session, leading to a united struggle.

Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

• a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I

• b) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I

• c) Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect

• d) Statement-l is incorrect but Statement-II is correct

Solution: c)

• The Surat Split in 1907 indeed weakened the national movement temporarily. The split between the Moderates and Extremists caused disunity within the Indian National Congress, slowing down the momentum of the struggle for independence.

• The differences between the Moderates and Extremists were not resolved immediately after the Surat session. It took almost a decade for the two factions to reconcile. They reunited only in 1916, with the Lucknow Pact, where both factions agreed to cooperate against British rule.

Solution: c)

• The Surat Split in 1907 indeed weakened the national movement temporarily. The split between the Moderates and Extremists caused disunity within the Indian National Congress, slowing down the momentum of the struggle for independence.

• The differences between the Moderates and Extremists were not resolved immediately after the Surat session. It took almost a decade for the two factions to reconcile. They reunited only in 1916, with the Lucknow Pact, where both factions agreed to cooperate against British rule.

• Question 4 of 5 4. Question Consider the following statements about the Home Rule League Movement: It aimed to achieve self-government for India within the British Commonwealth. The movement was initiated by Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Annie Besant. It advocated for complete independence from British rule. How many of the above statements is/are correct? a) Only one b) Only two c) All three d) None Correct Solution: b) The Home Rule League Movement (1916) was a pivotal development during the First World War, driven by the demand for increased Indian involvement in governance: The primary objective of the movement was to secure self-government (Home Rule) for India within the British Commonwealth, similar to the Irish Home Rule model. It sought greater autonomy while remaining within the imperial structure. The movement was launched by Tilak and Annie Besant, with Tilak’s Indian Home Rule League operating in Maharashtra, Central Provinces, and Berar, while Besant’s All India Home Rule League covered the rest of India. The movement sought to mobilize masses through public meetings, newspapers, pamphlets, and political education. The movement did not advocate for complete independence from British rule. It focused on obtaining self-governance rather than total sovereignty. The demand for complete independence was to emerge later during the Non-Cooperation Movement led by Gandhi. Thus, while statements 1 and 2 are correct, statement 3 is incorrect because the movement did not seek complete independence but rather self-government within the British Empire. Incorrect Solution: b) The Home Rule League Movement (1916) was a pivotal development during the First World War, driven by the demand for increased Indian involvement in governance: The primary objective of the movement was to secure self-government (Home Rule) for India within the British Commonwealth, similar to the Irish Home Rule model. It sought greater autonomy while remaining within the imperial structure. The movement was launched by Tilak and Annie Besant, with Tilak’s Indian Home Rule League operating in Maharashtra, Central Provinces, and Berar, while Besant’s All India Home Rule League covered the rest of India. The movement sought to mobilize masses through public meetings, newspapers, pamphlets, and political education. The movement did not advocate for complete independence from British rule. It focused on obtaining self-governance rather than total sovereignty. The demand for complete independence was to emerge later during the Non-Cooperation Movement led by Gandhi. Thus, while statements 1 and 2 are correct, statement 3 is incorrect because the movement did not seek complete independence but rather self-government within the British Empire.

#### 4. Question

Consider the following statements about the Home Rule League Movement:

• It aimed to achieve self-government for India within the British Commonwealth.

• The movement was initiated by Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Annie Besant.

• It advocated for complete independence from British rule.

How many of the above statements is/are correct?

• a) Only one

• b) Only two

• c) All three

Solution: b)

• The Home Rule League Movement (1916) was a pivotal development during the First World War, driven by the demand for increased Indian involvement in governance:

• The primary objective of the movement was to secure self-government (Home Rule) for India within the British Commonwealth, similar to the Irish Home Rule model. It sought greater autonomy while remaining within the imperial structure.

• The movement was launched by Tilak and Annie Besant, with Tilak’s Indian Home Rule League operating in Maharashtra, Central Provinces, and Berar, while Besant’s All India Home Rule League covered the rest of India. The movement sought to mobilize masses through public meetings, newspapers, pamphlets, and political education.

• The movement did not advocate for complete independence from British rule. It focused on obtaining self-governance rather than total sovereignty. The demand for complete independence was to emerge later during the Non-Cooperation Movement led by Gandhi.

Thus, while statements 1 and 2 are correct, statement 3 is incorrect because the movement did not seek complete independence but rather self-government within the British Empire.

Solution: b)

• The Home Rule League Movement (1916) was a pivotal development during the First World War, driven by the demand for increased Indian involvement in governance:

• The primary objective of the movement was to secure self-government (Home Rule) for India within the British Commonwealth, similar to the Irish Home Rule model. It sought greater autonomy while remaining within the imperial structure.

• The movement was launched by Tilak and Annie Besant, with Tilak’s Indian Home Rule League operating in Maharashtra, Central Provinces, and Berar, while Besant’s All India Home Rule League covered the rest of India. The movement sought to mobilize masses through public meetings, newspapers, pamphlets, and political education.

• The movement did not advocate for complete independence from British rule. It focused on obtaining self-governance rather than total sovereignty. The demand for complete independence was to emerge later during the Non-Cooperation Movement led by Gandhi.

Thus, while statements 1 and 2 are correct, statement 3 is incorrect because the movement did not seek complete independence but rather self-government within the British Empire.

• Question 5 of 5 5. Question With reference to the Lucknow Session of the Indian National Congress (1916), consider the following statements: It marked the reunion of the Moderates and Extremists within the Congress. The session resulted in the signing of the Lucknow Pact between the Congress and the Muslim League. The Lucknow Pact demanded separate electorates only for Hindus and Muslims. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? a) 1 and 2 only b) 2 and 3 only c) 1 and 3 only d) 1, 2, and 3 Correct Solution: a) The Lucknow Session of 1916 is considered a landmark event in the history of the Indian national movement for its unifying role: The session led to the reunion of Moderates and Extremists in the Congress after a split in 1907 at Surat. Prominent leaders like Tilak, who had reconciled with the Moderates, played a crucial role in achieving this reunion, strengthening the national movement. The session also marked the Lucknow Pact between the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League, where both parties agreed on joint constitutional demands. This was the first time the two major political organizations in India presented a unified front to the British government. The Lucknow Pact extended separate electorates beyond just Hindus and Muslims, allowing separate electorates for other communities as well, including Sikhs, Anglo-Indians, and Indian Christians, if desired by these communities. The Congress’s acceptance of separate electorates was a strategic move to ensure Hindu-Muslim unity in constitutional reforms. Therefore, statements 1 and 2 are correct, while statement 3 is incorrect as separate electorates were not limited to Hindus and Muslims alone. Incorrect Solution: a) The Lucknow Session of 1916 is considered a landmark event in the history of the Indian national movement for its unifying role: The session led to the reunion of Moderates and Extremists in the Congress after a split in 1907 at Surat. Prominent leaders like Tilak, who had reconciled with the Moderates, played a crucial role in achieving this reunion, strengthening the national movement. The session also marked the Lucknow Pact between the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League, where both parties agreed on joint constitutional demands. This was the first time the two major political organizations in India presented a unified front to the British government. The Lucknow Pact extended separate electorates beyond just Hindus and Muslims, allowing separate electorates for other communities as well, including Sikhs, Anglo-Indians, and Indian Christians, if desired by these communities. The Congress’s acceptance of separate electorates was a strategic move to ensure Hindu-Muslim unity in constitutional reforms. Therefore, statements 1 and 2 are correct, while statement 3 is incorrect as separate electorates were not limited to Hindus and Muslims alone.

#### 5. Question

With reference to the Lucknow Session of the Indian National Congress (1916), consider the following statements:

• It marked the reunion of the Moderates and Extremists within the Congress.

• The session resulted in the signing of the Lucknow Pact between the Congress and the Muslim League.

• The Lucknow Pact demanded separate electorates only for Hindus and Muslims.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

• a) 1 and 2 only

• b) 2 and 3 only

• c) 1 and 3 only

• d) 1, 2, and 3

Solution: a)

• The Lucknow Session of 1916 is considered a landmark event in the history of the Indian national movement for its unifying role:

• The session led to the reunion of Moderates and Extremists in the Congress after a split in 1907 at Surat. Prominent leaders like Tilak, who had reconciled with the Moderates, played a crucial role in achieving this reunion, strengthening the national movement.

• The session also marked the Lucknow Pact between the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League, where both parties agreed on joint constitutional demands. This was the first time the two major political organizations in India presented a unified front to the British government.

• The Lucknow Pact extended separate electorates beyond just Hindus and Muslims, allowing separate electorates for other communities as well, including Sikhs, Anglo-Indians, and Indian Christians, if desired by these communities. The Congress’s acceptance of separate electorates was a strategic move to ensure Hindu-Muslim unity in constitutional reforms.

• Therefore, statements 1 and 2 are correct, while statement 3 is incorrect as separate electorates were not limited to Hindus and Muslims alone.

Solution: a)

• The Lucknow Session of 1916 is considered a landmark event in the history of the Indian national movement for its unifying role:

• The session led to the reunion of Moderates and Extremists in the Congress after a split in 1907 at Surat. Prominent leaders like Tilak, who had reconciled with the Moderates, played a crucial role in achieving this reunion, strengthening the national movement.

• The session also marked the Lucknow Pact between the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League, where both parties agreed on joint constitutional demands. This was the first time the two major political organizations in India presented a unified front to the British government.

• The Lucknow Pact extended separate electorates beyond just Hindus and Muslims, allowing separate electorates for other communities as well, including Sikhs, Anglo-Indians, and Indian Christians, if desired by these communities. The Congress’s acceptance of separate electorates was a strategic move to ensure Hindu-Muslim unity in constitutional reforms.

• Therefore, statements 1 and 2 are correct, while statement 3 is incorrect as separate electorates were not limited to Hindus and Muslims alone.

Join our Official Telegram Channel HERE for Motivation and Fast Updates

Join our Twitter Channel HERE

Follow our Instagram Channel HERE

Stay Consistent

Consistency is key in UPSC preparation. By making the UPSC Static Quiz a part of your daily routine, you will steadily improve your knowledge base and exam readiness. Join us every day to tackle new questions and make your journey towards UPSC success more structured and effective.

AI-assisted content, editorially reviewed by Kartavya Desk Staff.

About Kartavya Desk Staff

Articles in our archive published before our editorial team was expanded. Legacy content is periodically reviewed and updated by our current editors.

All News