UPSC Static Quiz – History : 28 August 2025

UPSC Static Quiz – History : 28 August 2025 We will post 5 questions daily on static topics mentioned in the UPSC civil services preliminary examination syllabus. Each week will focus on a specific topic from the syllabus, such as History of India and Indian National Movement, Indian and World Geography, and more.We are excited to bring you our daily UPSC Static Quiz, designed to help you prepare for the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination. Each day, we will post 5 questions on static topics mentioned in the UPSC syllabus. This week, we are focusing on Indian and World Geography.

Why Participate in the UPSC Static Quiz?

Participating in daily quizzes helps reinforce your knowledge and identify areas that need improvement. Regular practice will enhance your recall abilities and boost your confidence for the examination. By covering various topics throughout the week, you ensure a comprehensive revision of the syllabus.

#### Quiz-summary

0 of 5 questions completed

Questions:

#### Information

Best of Luck! 🙂

You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.

Quiz is loading...

You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.

You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:

0 of 5 questions answered correctly

Your time:

Time has elapsed

You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)

#### Categories

• Not categorized 0%

• Question 1 of 5 1. Question With reference to the Quit India Movement of 1942, consider the following statements: It was marked by the establishment of parallel governments (Jatiya Sarkars) in several parts of the country, such as Satara and Tamluk. The Communist Party of India (CPI) gave its official and active support to the movement from its inception. Aruna Asaf Ali is famously remembered for hoisting the Indian tricolour at the Gowalia Tank Maidan in Bombay at the start of the movement. Which of the statements given above are correct? (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3 Correct Solution: C Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. A significant feature of the Quit India Movement was the establishment of parallel national governments in several areas after overthrowing British rule. The most prominent examples include the one in Ballia (UP) under Chittu Pandey, the Tamluk Jatiya Sarkar in Midnapore (Bengal) which ran until 1944 and undertook cyclone relief work and organized armed wings, and the Satara Prati Sarkar in Maharashtra which was the longest-lasting and had organized ‘nyayadan mandals’ (people’s courts). Statement 2 is incorrect. The Communist Party of India (CPI) officially opposed the Quit India Movement. Following the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941, the CPI’s stance changed from terming the World War II an “imperialist war” to a “people’s war.” They argued that supporting the Allied war effort was paramount, and therefore, they did not support the Quit India Movement which was aimed against the British. Statement 3 is correct. On August 9, 1942, after the top Congress leadership had been arrested overnight, Aruna Asaf Ali, a prominent socialist leader, defied the British by hoisting the Indian National Congress flag at the Gowalia Tank Maidan (now August Kranti Maidan) in Bombay, marking the formal launch of the movement. This act became an iconic symbol of the defiance and the role of the younger, more radical leadership that came to the fore during the movement. Incorrect Solution: C Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. A significant feature of the Quit India Movement was the establishment of parallel national governments in several areas after overthrowing British rule. The most prominent examples include the one in Ballia (UP) under Chittu Pandey, the Tamluk Jatiya Sarkar in Midnapore (Bengal) which ran until 1944 and undertook cyclone relief work and organized armed wings, and the Satara Prati Sarkar in Maharashtra which was the longest-lasting and had organized ‘nyayadan mandals’ (people’s courts). Statement 2 is incorrect. The Communist Party of India (CPI) officially opposed the Quit India Movement. Following the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941, the CPI’s stance changed from terming the World War II an “imperialist war” to a “people’s war.” They argued that supporting the Allied war effort was paramount, and therefore, they did not support the Quit India Movement which was aimed against the British. Statement 3 is correct. On August 9, 1942, after the top Congress leadership had been arrested overnight, Aruna Asaf Ali, a prominent socialist leader, defied the British by hoisting the Indian National Congress flag at the Gowalia Tank Maidan (now August Kranti Maidan) in Bombay, marking the formal launch of the movement. This act became an iconic symbol of the defiance and the role of the younger, more radical leadership that came to the fore during the movement.

#### 1. Question

With reference to the Quit India Movement of 1942, consider the following statements:

• It was marked by the establishment of parallel governments (Jatiya Sarkars) in several parts of the country, such as Satara and Tamluk.

• The Communist Party of India (CPI) gave its official and active support to the movement from its inception.

• Aruna Asaf Ali is famously remembered for hoisting the Indian tricolour at the Gowalia Tank Maidan in Bombay at the start of the movement.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

• (a) 1 and 2 only

• (b) 2 and 3 only

• (c) 1 and 3 only

• (d) 1, 2 and 3

Solution: C

Explanation:

• Statement 1 is correct. A significant feature of the Quit India Movement was the establishment of parallel national governments in several areas after overthrowing British rule. The most prominent examples include the one in Ballia (UP) under Chittu Pandey, the Tamluk Jatiya Sarkar in Midnapore (Bengal) which ran until 1944 and undertook cyclone relief work and organized armed wings, and the Satara Prati Sarkar in Maharashtra which was the longest-lasting and had organized ‘nyayadan mandals’ (people’s courts).

• Statement 2 is incorrect. The Communist Party of India (CPI) officially opposed the Quit India Movement. Following the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941, the CPI’s stance changed from terming the World War II an “imperialist war” to a “people’s war.” They argued that supporting the Allied war effort was paramount, and therefore, they did not support the Quit India Movement which was aimed against the British.

• Statement 3 is correct. On August 9, 1942, after the top Congress leadership had been arrested overnight, Aruna Asaf Ali, a prominent socialist leader, defied the British by hoisting the Indian National Congress flag at the Gowalia Tank Maidan (now August Kranti Maidan) in Bombay, marking the formal launch of the movement. This act became an iconic symbol of the defiance and the role of the younger, more radical leadership that came to the fore during the movement.

Solution: C

Explanation:

• Question 2 of 5 2. Question Consider the following statements: The failure of the Cripps Mission was a direct cause for the launch of the Quit India Movement. The movement was characterized by a complete absence of violence from the protestors’ side. Which of the above statements are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 Correct Solution: A Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. The failure of the Cripps Mission in April 1942 created widespread disillusionment and frustration. It convinced the Indian leadership, especially Mahatma Gandhi, that the British government was not sincere about transferring power and was merely playing for time. This feeling that there was no other option left but to launch a final, decisive struggle for freedom was the direct and immediate catalyst for the Quit India Movement, which was launched a few months later in August 1942. Statement 2 is incorrect. While the movement was officially launched by Mahatma Gandhi on the principle of non-violence (Ahimsa), in practice, it saw widespread violence. Following the arrest of the entire leadership, the movement became spontaneous and leaderless. Protestors attacked government property, disrupted communication lines (railways and telegraph), and clashed with the police. The British response was also extremely brutal. While Gandhi did not sanction this violence, it was a defining characteristic of the movement on the ground. Incorrect Solution: A Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. The failure of the Cripps Mission in April 1942 created widespread disillusionment and frustration. It convinced the Indian leadership, especially Mahatma Gandhi, that the British government was not sincere about transferring power and was merely playing for time. This feeling that there was no other option left but to launch a final, decisive struggle for freedom was the direct and immediate catalyst for the Quit India Movement, which was launched a few months later in August 1942. Statement 2 is incorrect. While the movement was officially launched by Mahatma Gandhi on the principle of non-violence (Ahimsa), in practice, it saw widespread violence. Following the arrest of the entire leadership, the movement became spontaneous and leaderless. Protestors attacked government property, disrupted communication lines (railways and telegraph), and clashed with the police. The British response was also extremely brutal. While Gandhi did not sanction this violence, it was a defining characteristic of the movement on the ground.

#### 2. Question

Consider the following statements:

• The failure of the Cripps Mission was a direct cause for the launch of the Quit India Movement.

• The movement was characterized by a complete absence of violence from the protestors’ side.

Which of the above statements are correct?

• (a) 1 only

• (b) 2 only

• (c) Both 1 and 2

• (d) Neither 1 nor 2

Solution: A

Explanation:

• Statement 1 is correct. The failure of the Cripps Mission in April 1942 created widespread disillusionment and frustration. It convinced the Indian leadership, especially Mahatma Gandhi, that the British government was not sincere about transferring power and was merely playing for time. This feeling that there was no other option left but to launch a final, decisive struggle for freedom was the direct and immediate catalyst for the Quit India Movement, which was launched a few months later in August 1942.

• Statement 2 is incorrect. While the movement was officially launched by Mahatma Gandhi on the principle of non-violence (Ahimsa), in practice, it saw widespread violence. Following the arrest of the entire leadership, the movement became spontaneous and leaderless. Protestors attacked government property, disrupted communication lines (railways and telegraph), and clashed with the police. The British response was also extremely brutal. While Gandhi did not sanction this violence, it was a defining characteristic of the movement on the ground.

Solution: A

Explanation:

• Question 3 of 5 3. Question Consider the following statements regarding ‘Rajagopalachari Formula’. Statement I: The ‘Rajagopalachari Formula’ of 1944 was rejected by Muhammad Ali Jinnah. Statement II: The formula did not accept the two-nation theory and refused to consider the creation of a sovereign Pakistan. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements? (a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I (b) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct but Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I c) Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect d) Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct Correct Solution: C Explanation: Statement I is correct. The C.R. Formula, which formed the basis of the Gandhi-Jinnah talks in 1944, was rejected by Muhammad Ali Jinnah. Statement II is incorrect. The core of the Rajagopalachari Formula was a tacit acceptance of the demand for Pakistan. It proposed that after the war, a commission would demarcate contiguous districts in the north-west and north-east where Muslims were in an absolute majority. A plebiscite of all inhabitants in these areas would then decide the issue of separation. This was a clear departure from the Congress’s earlier stand and was the first time a prominent Congress leader proposed a plan involving the creation of a separate state. Jinnah rejected it not because it refused to consider Pakistan, but because he wanted the Congress to accept the two-nation theory outright, demanded that only Muslims vote in the plebiscite, and opposed the idea of a common centre for subjects like defence and commerce. He famously described the offer as a “moth-eaten, mutilated” Pakistan. Incorrect Solution: C Explanation: Statement I is correct. The C.R. Formula, which formed the basis of the Gandhi-Jinnah talks in 1944, was rejected by Muhammad Ali Jinnah. Statement II is incorrect. The core of the Rajagopalachari Formula was a tacit acceptance of the demand for Pakistan. It proposed that after the war, a commission would demarcate contiguous districts in the north-west and north-east where Muslims were in an absolute majority. A plebiscite of all inhabitants in these areas would then decide the issue of separation. This was a clear departure from the Congress’s earlier stand and was the first time a prominent Congress leader proposed a plan involving the creation of a separate state. Jinnah rejected it not because it refused to consider Pakistan, but because he wanted the Congress to accept the two-nation theory outright, demanded that only Muslims vote in the plebiscite, and opposed the idea of a common centre for subjects like defence and commerce. He famously described the offer as a “moth-eaten, mutilated” Pakistan.

#### 3. Question

Consider the following statements regarding ‘Rajagopalachari Formula’.

Statement I: The ‘Rajagopalachari Formula’ of 1944 was rejected by Muhammad Ali Jinnah. Statement II: The formula did not accept the two-nation theory and refused to consider the creation of a sovereign Pakistan.

Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

• (a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I

• (b) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct but Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I

• c) Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect

• d) Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct

Solution: C

Explanation:

• Statement I is correct. The C.R. Formula, which formed the basis of the Gandhi-Jinnah talks in 1944, was rejected by Muhammad Ali Jinnah.

• Statement II is incorrect. The core of the Rajagopalachari Formula was a tacit acceptance of the demand for Pakistan. It proposed that after the war, a commission would demarcate contiguous districts in the north-west and north-east where Muslims were in an absolute majority. A plebiscite of all inhabitants in these areas would then decide the issue of separation. This was a clear departure from the Congress’s earlier stand and was the first time a prominent Congress leader proposed a plan involving the creation of a separate state. Jinnah rejected it not because it refused to consider Pakistan, but because he wanted the Congress to accept the two-nation theory outright, demanded that only Muslims vote in the plebiscite, and opposed the idea of a common centre for subjects like defence and commerce. He famously described the offer as a “moth-eaten, mutilated” Pakistan.

Solution: C

Explanation:

• Statement I is correct. The C.R. Formula, which formed the basis of the Gandhi-Jinnah talks in 1944, was rejected by Muhammad Ali Jinnah.

• Question 4 of 5 4. Question Consider the following statements regarding the Quit India Movement: The resolution for the movement was passed at the All India Congress Committee session in Wardha. The movement was endorsed by the Hindu Mahasabha as a necessary step to counter British intransigence. The British government’s immediate response was to arrest Mahatma Gandhi and the entire Congress Working Committee. How many of the above statements are correct? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None Correct Solution: A Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. The Congress Working Committee did meet in Wardha in July 1942 and passed a resolution authorizing Gandhi to take charge of the movement. However, the final and famous Quit India Resolution was formally ratified by the All India Congress Committee (AICC) at its session in Bombay (now Mumbai) at the Gowalia Tank Maidan on August 8, 1942. Statement 2 is incorrect. The Hindu Mahasabha officially boycotted the Quit India Movement. Its leader, V.D. Savarkar, instructed Mahasabha members who were part of legislatures or local bodies to stick to their posts and continue performing their duties, a policy of “responsive cooperation” with the British. They did not endorse the movement. Statement 3 is correct. The British government’s response was swift and decisive. In a pre-dawn swoop on August 9, 1942, under the Defence of India Rules, the government arrested Mahatma Gandhi, all members of the Congress Working Committee, and other prominent Congress leaders across the country. This pre-emptive strike was intended to decapitate the movement before it could begin, but it resulted in a spontaneous and widespread popular revolt. Incorrect Solution: A Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. The Congress Working Committee did meet in Wardha in July 1942 and passed a resolution authorizing Gandhi to take charge of the movement. However, the final and famous Quit India Resolution was formally ratified by the All India Congress Committee (AICC) at its session in Bombay (now Mumbai) at the Gowalia Tank Maidan on August 8, 1942. Statement 2 is incorrect. The Hindu Mahasabha officially boycotted the Quit India Movement. Its leader, V.D. Savarkar, instructed Mahasabha members who were part of legislatures or local bodies to stick to their posts and continue performing their duties, a policy of “responsive cooperation” with the British. They did not endorse the movement. Statement 3 is correct. The British government’s response was swift and decisive. In a pre-dawn swoop on August 9, 1942, under the Defence of India Rules, the government arrested Mahatma Gandhi, all members of the Congress Working Committee, and other prominent Congress leaders across the country. This pre-emptive strike was intended to decapitate the movement before it could begin, but it resulted in a spontaneous and widespread popular revolt.

#### 4. Question

Consider the following statements regarding the Quit India Movement:

• The resolution for the movement was passed at the All India Congress Committee session in Wardha.

• The movement was endorsed by the Hindu Mahasabha as a necessary step to counter British intransigence.

• The British government’s immediate response was to arrest Mahatma Gandhi and the entire Congress Working Committee.

How many of the above statements are correct?

• (a) Only one

• (b) Only two

• (c) All three

Solution: A

Explanation:

• Statement 1 is incorrect. The Congress Working Committee did meet in Wardha in July 1942 and passed a resolution authorizing Gandhi to take charge of the movement. However, the final and famous Quit India Resolution was formally ratified by the All India Congress Committee (AICC) at its session in Bombay (now Mumbai) at the Gowalia Tank Maidan on August 8, 1942.

• Statement 2 is incorrect. The Hindu Mahasabha officially boycotted the Quit India Movement. Its leader, V.D. Savarkar, instructed Mahasabha members who were part of legislatures or local bodies to stick to their posts and continue performing their duties, a policy of “responsive cooperation” with the British. They did not endorse the movement.

• Statement 3 is correct. The British government’s response was swift and decisive. In a pre-dawn swoop on August 9, 1942, under the Defence of India Rules, the government arrested Mahatma Gandhi, all members of the Congress Working Committee, and other prominent Congress leaders across the country. This pre-emptive strike was intended to decapitate the movement before it could begin, but it resulted in a spontaneous and widespread popular revolt.

Solution: A

Explanation:

• Question 5 of 5 5. Question Consider the Government of India Act, 1935. Which of the following provisions represented a direct modification, abolition, or reversal of a specific feature of the Government of India Act, 1919? Abolition of Dyarchy at the provincial level. Introduction of bicameralism in several provinces. Establishment of a Federal Court. Abolition of the Council of India, which was established in 1858. Select the correct answer using the code given below: (a) 1 only (b) 1 and 2 only (c) 2, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4 Correct Solution: B Explanation: Abolition of Dyarchy at the provincial level: This is a correct and direct reversal. The 1919 Act had introduced Dyarchy in the provinces, a system widely seen as a failure. The 1935 Act abolished provincial Dyarchy and introduced ‘Provincial Autonomy’ in its place. Interestingly, it proposed introducing Dyarchy at the Centre, though this provision never came into effect. Introduction of bicameralism in several provinces: This is a correct modification. The 1919 Act had introduced bicameralism only at the Centre. The 1935 Act extended the principle of bicameralism to six of the eleven provinces (Bengal, Bombay, Madras, Bihar, Assam, and the United Provinces), creating a Legislative Council (upper house) and a Legislative Assembly (lower house) in them. Establishment of a Federal Court: This was a new feature, not a modification of a 1919 provision. The 1919 Act did not provide for a federal judicial body. The Federal Court was a novel institution created by the 1935 Act to interpret the constitution and settle disputes between federal units. Abolition of the Council of India: This was a correct provision of the 1935 Act, but it was a modification of the Government of India Act of 1858, not the 1919 Act. The Council of India was created in 1858 to assist the Secretary of State. Its abolition in 1935 was a significant step but not a direct change to the 1919 framework. Incorrect Solution: B Explanation: Abolition of Dyarchy at the provincial level: This is a correct and direct reversal. The 1919 Act had introduced Dyarchy in the provinces, a system widely seen as a failure. The 1935 Act abolished provincial Dyarchy and introduced ‘Provincial Autonomy’ in its place. Interestingly, it proposed introducing Dyarchy at the Centre, though this provision never came into effect. Introduction of bicameralism in several provinces: This is a correct modification. The 1919 Act had introduced bicameralism only at the Centre. The 1935 Act extended the principle of bicameralism to six of the eleven provinces (Bengal, Bombay, Madras, Bihar, Assam, and the United Provinces), creating a Legislative Council (upper house) and a Legislative Assembly (lower house) in them. Establishment of a Federal Court: This was a new feature, not a modification of a 1919 provision. The 1919 Act did not provide for a federal judicial body. The Federal Court was a novel institution created by the 1935 Act to interpret the constitution and settle disputes between federal units. Abolition of the Council of India: This was a correct provision of the 1935 Act, but it was a modification of the Government of India Act of 1858, not the 1919 Act. The Council of India was created in 1858 to assist the Secretary of State. Its abolition in 1935 was a significant step but not a direct change to the 1919 framework.

#### 5. Question

Consider the Government of India Act, 1935. Which of the following provisions represented a direct modification, abolition, or reversal of a specific feature of the Government of India Act, 1919?

• Abolition of Dyarchy at the provincial level.

• Introduction of bicameralism in several provinces.

• Establishment of a Federal Court.

• Abolition of the Council of India, which was established in 1858.

Select the correct answer using the code given below:

• (a) 1 only

• (b) 1 and 2 only

• (c) 2, 3 and 4 only

• (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

Solution: B

Explanation:

• Abolition of Dyarchy at the provincial level: This is a correct and direct reversal. The 1919 Act had introduced Dyarchy in the provinces, a system widely seen as a failure. The 1935 Act abolished provincial Dyarchy and introduced ‘Provincial Autonomy’ in its place. Interestingly, it proposed introducing Dyarchy at the Centre, though this provision never came into effect.

• Introduction of bicameralism in several provinces: This is a correct modification. The 1919 Act had introduced bicameralism only at the Centre. The 1935 Act extended the principle of bicameralism to six of the eleven provinces (Bengal, Bombay, Madras, Bihar, Assam, and the United Provinces), creating a Legislative Council (upper house) and a Legislative Assembly (lower house) in them.

• Establishment of a Federal Court: This was a new feature, not a modification of a 1919 provision. The 1919 Act did not provide for a federal judicial body. The Federal Court was a novel institution created by the 1935 Act to interpret the constitution and settle disputes between federal units.

• Abolition of the Council of India: This was a correct provision of the 1935 Act, but it was a modification of the Government of India Act of 1858, not the 1919 Act. The Council of India was created in 1858 to assist the Secretary of State. Its abolition in 1935 was a significant step but not a direct change to the 1919 framework.

Solution: B

Explanation:

Join our Official Telegram Channel HERE for Motivation and Fast Updates

Join our Twitter Channel HERE

Follow our Instagram Channel HERE

Stay Consistent

Consistency is key in UPSC preparation. By making the UPSC Static Quiz a part of your daily routine, you will steadily improve your knowledge base and exam readiness. Join us every day to tackle new questions and make your journey towards UPSC success more structured and effective.