UPSC Static Quiz – History : 27 October 2025

UPSC Static Quiz – History : 27 October 2025 We will post 5 questions daily on static topics mentioned in the UPSC civil services preliminary examination syllabus. Each week will focus on a specific topic from the syllabus, such as History of India and Indian National Movement, Indian and World Geography, and more. We are excited to bring you our daily UPSC Static Quiz, designed to help you prepare for the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination. Each day, we will post 5 questions on static topics mentioned in the UPSC syllabus. This week, we are focusing on Indian and World Geography.

Why Participate in the UPSC Static Quiz?

Participating in daily quizzes helps reinforce your knowledge and identify areas that need improvement. Regular practice will enhance your recall abilities and boost your confidence for the examination. By covering various topics throughout the week, you ensure a comprehensive revision of the syllabus.

#### Quiz-summary

0 of 5 questions completed

Questions:

#### Information

Best of Luck! 🙂

You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.

Quiz is loading...

You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.

You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:

0 of 5 questions answered correctly

Your time:

Time has elapsed

You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)

#### Categories

• Not categorized 0%

• Question 1 of 5 1. Question Consider the following statements: Statement I: The results of the 1945 General Elections provided the Muslim League with a definitive popular mandate that it used to negotiate for the creation of Pakistan. Statement II: The failure of the Simla Conference earlier in 1945 had already demonstrated the British government’s reluctance to impose a constitutional solution against the wishes of the Muslim League. Statement III: The Indian Independence Act of 1947, which legislated the partition of India, was the logical culmination of the political realities established by the events in Statements I and II. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements? (a) Statement I and Statement II are independent causes for the event in Statement III. (b) The event in Statement I was the direct and sole cause of the events in Statement II and Statement III. (c) Statement III is a correct statement, and it is explained by the combined effect of the events described in Statement I and Statement II. (d) Statement II is the consequence of Statement I, and Statement III is the consequence of Statement II. Correct Solution: C Statement I is correct. The 1945 elections, where the Muslim League won all Muslim seats in the central assembly, gave M.A. Jinnah the undeniable political mandate he needed to argue that the League was the sole voice of Indian Muslims and that his demand for Pakistan had popular backing. Statement II is also correct. The Simla Conference failed because Lord Wavell refused to proceed without Jinnah’s agreement, thereby giving the League a de facto veto over any constitutional plan. This signaled that the British would not bypass the League. Statement III is also correct. The Indian Independence Act of 1947, which created Pakistan, was not a sudden decision. It was the legislative end-point of a process where the League’s demand, backed by a popular mandate (Statement I) and a British-conceded veto power (Statement II), became politically irresistible. Incorrect Solution: C Statement I is correct. The 1945 elections, where the Muslim League won all Muslim seats in the central assembly, gave M.A. Jinnah the undeniable political mandate he needed to argue that the League was the sole voice of Indian Muslims and that his demand for Pakistan had popular backing. Statement II is also correct. The Simla Conference failed because Lord Wavell refused to proceed without Jinnah’s agreement, thereby giving the League a de facto veto over any constitutional plan. This signaled that the British would not bypass the League. Statement III is also correct. The Indian Independence Act of 1947, which created Pakistan, was not a sudden decision. It was the legislative end-point of a process where the League’s demand, backed by a popular mandate (Statement I) and a British-conceded veto power (Statement II), became politically irresistible.

#### 1. Question

Consider the following statements:

Statement I: The results of the 1945 General Elections provided the Muslim League with a definitive popular mandate that it used to negotiate for the creation of Pakistan.

Statement II: The failure of the Simla Conference earlier in 1945 had already demonstrated the British government’s reluctance to impose a constitutional solution against the wishes of the Muslim League.

Statement III: The Indian Independence Act of 1947, which legislated the partition of India, was the logical culmination of the political realities established by the events in Statements I and II.

Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

• (a) Statement I and Statement II are independent causes for the event in Statement III.

• (b) The event in Statement I was the direct and sole cause of the events in Statement II and Statement III.

• (c) Statement III is a correct statement, and it is explained by the combined effect of the events described in Statement I and Statement II.

• (d) Statement II is the consequence of Statement I, and Statement III is the consequence of Statement II.

Solution: C

• Statement I is correct. The 1945 elections, where the Muslim League won all Muslim seats in the central assembly, gave M.A. Jinnah the undeniable political mandate he needed to argue that the League was the sole voice of Indian Muslims and that his demand for Pakistan had popular backing.

• Statement II is also correct. The Simla Conference failed because Lord Wavell refused to proceed without Jinnah’s agreement, thereby giving the League a de facto veto over any constitutional plan. This signaled that the British would not bypass the League.

• Statement III is also correct. The Indian Independence Act of 1947, which created Pakistan, was not a sudden decision. It was the legislative end-point of a process where the League’s demand, backed by a popular mandate (Statement I) and a British-conceded veto power (Statement II), became politically irresistible.

Solution: C

• Question 2 of 5 2. Question Consider the following statements with reference to the Anglo-Mysore Wars: The First Anglo-Mysore War concluded with the Treaty of Madras, which established a defensive alliance obligating the British to support Hyder Ali against other powers. The immediate cause for the Third Anglo-Mysore War was Tipu Sultan’s attack on Travancore, a state that was an ally of the British. The Second Anglo-Mysore War ended with the Treaty of Seringapatam, which forced Tipu Sultan to cede half of his territories to the British and their allies. Lord Wellesley’s policy of Subsidiary Alliance was a direct cause of the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War, as Tipu Sultan’s refusal to accept it led to the British invasion. How many of the above statements are correct? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) Only three (d) All four Correct Solution: C Statement 1 is correct. The First Anglo-Mysore War (1767-69) ended with Hyder Ali dictating terms to the British at the gates of Madras. The resulting Treaty of Madras (1769) included a clause for mutual assistance and a defensive alliance, which the British later failed to honour when Mysore was attacked by the Marathas in 1771, a key grievance leading to the second war. Statement 2 is correct. The Third Anglo-Mysore War (1790-92) was precipitated by Tipu’s invasion of Travancore in 1789. Travancore was an ally of the British, and Tipu’s attack was seen as a challenge to British authority, providing Governor-General Cornwallis with the pretext to declare war. Statement 3 is incorrect. The Second Anglo-Mysore War (1780-84) ended with the Treaty of Mangalore (1784), which largely restored the status quo ante bellum, with both sides returning conquered territories and prisoners. The Treaty of Seringapatam (1792) was the one that concluded the Third Anglo-Mysore War, and it was under this treaty that Tipu was forced to cede half his kingdom and pay a massive indemnity. Statement 4 is correct. By the time Lord Wellesley arrived as Governor-General in 1798, his primary policy was the expansion of British paramountcy through the Subsidiary Alliance. He saw Tipu Sultan’s independent power and his alleged ties with the French as a direct threat. Wellesley presented the Subsidiary Alliance to Tipu, and his refusal to accept this subordinate status was the final trigger for the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War (1799), which aimed to decisively eliminate Mysore as a threat. Incorrect Solution: C Statement 1 is correct. The First Anglo-Mysore War (1767-69) ended with Hyder Ali dictating terms to the British at the gates of Madras. The resulting Treaty of Madras (1769) included a clause for mutual assistance and a defensive alliance, which the British later failed to honour when Mysore was attacked by the Marathas in 1771, a key grievance leading to the second war. Statement 2 is correct. The Third Anglo-Mysore War (1790-92) was precipitated by Tipu’s invasion of Travancore in 1789. Travancore was an ally of the British, and Tipu’s attack was seen as a challenge to British authority, providing Governor-General Cornwallis with the pretext to declare war. Statement 3 is incorrect. The Second Anglo-Mysore War (1780-84) ended with the Treaty of Mangalore (1784), which largely restored the status quo ante bellum, with both sides returning conquered territories and prisoners. The Treaty of Seringapatam (1792) was the one that concluded the Third Anglo-Mysore War, and it was under this treaty that Tipu was forced to cede half his kingdom and pay a massive indemnity. Statement 4 is correct. By the time Lord Wellesley arrived as Governor-General in 1798, his primary policy was the expansion of British paramountcy through the Subsidiary Alliance. He saw Tipu Sultan’s independent power and his alleged ties with the French as a direct threat. Wellesley presented the Subsidiary Alliance to Tipu, and his refusal to accept this subordinate status was the final trigger for the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War (1799), which aimed to decisively eliminate Mysore as a threat.

#### 2. Question

Consider the following statements with reference to the Anglo-Mysore Wars:

• The First Anglo-Mysore War concluded with the Treaty of Madras, which established a defensive alliance obligating the British to support Hyder Ali against other powers.

• The immediate cause for the Third Anglo-Mysore War was Tipu Sultan’s attack on Travancore, a state that was an ally of the British.

• The Second Anglo-Mysore War ended with the Treaty of Seringapatam, which forced Tipu Sultan to cede half of his territories to the British and their allies.

• Lord Wellesley’s policy of Subsidiary Alliance was a direct cause of the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War, as Tipu Sultan’s refusal to accept it led to the British invasion.

How many of the above statements are correct?

• (a) Only one

• (b) Only two

• (c) Only three

• (d) All four

Solution: C

• Statement 1 is correct. The First Anglo-Mysore War (1767-69) ended with Hyder Ali dictating terms to the British at the gates of Madras. The resulting Treaty of Madras (1769) included a clause for mutual assistance and a defensive alliance, which the British later failed to honour when Mysore was attacked by the Marathas in 1771, a key grievance leading to the second war.

• Statement 2 is correct. The Third Anglo-Mysore War (1790-92) was precipitated by Tipu’s invasion of Travancore in 1789. Travancore was an ally of the British, and Tipu’s attack was seen as a challenge to British authority, providing Governor-General Cornwallis with the pretext to declare war.

• Statement 3 is incorrect. The Second Anglo-Mysore War (1780-84) ended with the Treaty of Mangalore (1784), which largely restored the status quo ante bellum, with both sides returning conquered territories and prisoners. The Treaty of Seringapatam (1792) was the one that concluded the Third Anglo-Mysore War, and it was under this treaty that Tipu was forced to cede half his kingdom and pay a massive indemnity.

• Statement 4 is correct. By the time Lord Wellesley arrived as Governor-General in 1798, his primary policy was the expansion of British paramountcy through the Subsidiary Alliance. He saw Tipu Sultan’s independent power and his alleged ties with the French as a direct threat. Wellesley presented the Subsidiary Alliance to Tipu, and his refusal to accept this subordinate status was the final trigger for the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War (1799), which aimed to decisively eliminate Mysore as a threat.

Solution: C

• Question 3 of 5 3. Question Consider the following statements regarding the reforms of Lord William Bentinck: Influenced by utilitarian principles, he abolished the provincial Courts of Appeal and Circuit set up by Cornwallis and transferred their functions to District Collectors. His administration enacted Regulation XVII of 1829, which declared the practice of Sati illegal and punishable as culpable homicide. As part of his land revenue reforms, he introduced the Ryotwari System in the North-Western Provinces (Agra and Awadh) to increase the Company’s revenue. How many of the above statements are correct? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None Correct Solution: B Statement 1 is correct. Bentinck, guided by principles of efficiency and economy, undertook significant judicial reforms. He abolished the four Provincial Courts of Appeal and Circuit that had been established by Lord Cornwallis, as they were found to be slow and inefficient. Their functions were transferred to the Magistrates and Collectors under the supervision of a Commissioner of Revenue and Circuit, thus streamlining the judicial process. Statement 2 is correct. This is one of Bentinck’s most famous reforms. Responding to a long campaign by Indian social reformers like Raja Ram Mohan Roy and driven by his own humanitarian convictions, Bentinck’s government passed the historic Bengal Sati Regulation, or Regulation XVII, in 1829. This landmark legislation made the practice of Sati illegal and punishable by the criminal courts. Statement 3 is incorrect. Lord William Bentinck’s administration was associated with the Mahalwari System, not the Ryotwari System, in the North-Western Provinces. While the Ryotwari system was prevalent in Southern India, the Mahalwari system, based on settlement with the village (mahal), was the system that Bentinck and his officials, like R.M. Bird, improved and extended in regions like Agra and Awadh to regularize and enhance revenue collection. Incorrect Solution: B Statement 1 is correct. Bentinck, guided by principles of efficiency and economy, undertook significant judicial reforms. He abolished the four Provincial Courts of Appeal and Circuit that had been established by Lord Cornwallis, as they were found to be slow and inefficient. Their functions were transferred to the Magistrates and Collectors under the supervision of a Commissioner of Revenue and Circuit, thus streamlining the judicial process. Statement 2 is correct. This is one of Bentinck’s most famous reforms. Responding to a long campaign by Indian social reformers like Raja Ram Mohan Roy and driven by his own humanitarian convictions, Bentinck’s government passed the historic Bengal Sati Regulation, or Regulation XVII, in 1829. This landmark legislation made the practice of Sati illegal and punishable by the criminal courts. Statement 3 is incorrect. Lord William Bentinck’s administration was associated with the Mahalwari System, not the Ryotwari System, in the North-Western Provinces. While the Ryotwari system was prevalent in Southern India, the Mahalwari system, based on settlement with the village (mahal), was the system that Bentinck and his officials, like R.M. Bird, improved and extended in regions like Agra and Awadh to regularize and enhance revenue collection.

#### 3. Question

Consider the following statements regarding the reforms of Lord William Bentinck:

• Influenced by utilitarian principles, he abolished the provincial Courts of Appeal and Circuit set up by Cornwallis and transferred their functions to District Collectors.

• His administration enacted Regulation XVII of 1829, which declared the practice of Sati illegal and punishable as culpable homicide.

• As part of his land revenue reforms, he introduced the Ryotwari System in the North-Western Provinces (Agra and Awadh) to increase the Company’s revenue.

How many of the above statements are correct?

• (a) Only one

• (b) Only two

• (c) All three

Solution: B

• Statement 1 is correct. Bentinck, guided by principles of efficiency and economy, undertook significant judicial reforms. He abolished the four Provincial Courts of Appeal and Circuit that had been established by Lord Cornwallis, as they were found to be slow and inefficient. Their functions were transferred to the Magistrates and Collectors under the supervision of a Commissioner of Revenue and Circuit, thus streamlining the judicial process.

• Statement 2 is correct. This is one of Bentinck’s most famous reforms. Responding to a long campaign by Indian social reformers like Raja Ram Mohan Roy and driven by his own humanitarian convictions, Bentinck’s government passed the historic Bengal Sati Regulation, or Regulation XVII, in 1829. This landmark legislation made the practice of Sati illegal and punishable by the criminal courts.

• Statement 3 is incorrect. Lord William Bentinck’s administration was associated with the Mahalwari System, not the Ryotwari System, in the North-Western Provinces. While the Ryotwari system was prevalent in Southern India, the Mahalwari system, based on settlement with the village (mahal), was the system that Bentinck and his officials, like R.M. Bird, improved and extended in regions like Agra and Awadh to regularize and enhance revenue collection.

Solution: B

• Question 4 of 5 4. Question Consider the following statements: Statement-I: The English East India Company ultimately triumphed over its European rivals, particularly the French, in the struggle for supremacy in India. Statement-II: The English Company, being a private enterprise with a greater degree of autonomy and superior financial resources derived from profitable trade, possessed greater dynamism and resilience compared to the state-controlled and financially weaker French Company. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements? (a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I (b) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I (c) Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect (d) Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct Correct Solution: A Statement-I is correct. By the end of the Third Carnatic War in 1763, the English East India Company had decisively eliminated the French as a serious political and military rival in India. While other European powers like the Portuguese and Dutch remained in their small pockets, the British had established themselves as the dominant European power, paving the way for their eventual conquest of the subcontinent. Statement-II is correct. This statement highlights the fundamental structural differences between the English and French East India Companies, which were crucial to the outcome of their rivalry. The English EIC was a private joint-stock company, driven by profit motives and managed by a board responsive to its shareholders. While it received state support, it operated with considerable autonomy and was financially robust due to its vast and profitable trade. In contrast, the French Company was a state enterprise, heavily dependent on the French government for grants and subsidies and subject to the whims of state policy. This made it less commercially dynamic, more bureaucratic, and financially vulnerable, especially when the French state was preoccupied with European affairs. The English also possessed a superior navy and held three key ports (Calcutta, Bombay, Madras) compared to the French who primarily had Pondicherry. Therefore, Statement-II is the correct and fundamental explanation for the success mentioned in Statement-I. Incorrect Solution: A Statement-I is correct. By the end of the Third Carnatic War in 1763, the English East India Company had decisively eliminated the French as a serious political and military rival in India. While other European powers like the Portuguese and Dutch remained in their small pockets, the British had established themselves as the dominant European power, paving the way for their eventual conquest of the subcontinent. Statement-II is correct. This statement highlights the fundamental structural differences between the English and French East India Companies, which were crucial to the outcome of their rivalry. The English EIC was a private joint-stock company, driven by profit motives and managed by a board responsive to its shareholders. While it received state support, it operated with considerable autonomy and was financially robust due to its vast and profitable trade. In contrast, the French Company was a state enterprise, heavily dependent on the French government for grants and subsidies and subject to the whims of state policy. This made it less commercially dynamic, more bureaucratic, and financially vulnerable, especially when the French state was preoccupied with European affairs. The English also possessed a superior navy and held three key ports (Calcutta, Bombay, Madras) compared to the French who primarily had Pondicherry. Therefore, Statement-II is the correct and fundamental explanation for the success mentioned in Statement-I.

#### 4. Question

Consider the following statements:

Statement-I: The English East India Company ultimately triumphed over its European rivals, particularly the French, in the struggle for supremacy in India.

Statement-II: The English Company, being a private enterprise with a greater degree of autonomy and superior financial resources derived from profitable trade, possessed greater dynamism and resilience compared to the state-controlled and financially weaker French Company.

Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

• (a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I

• (b) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I

• (c) Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect

• (d) Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct

Solution: A

• Statement-I is correct. By the end of the Third Carnatic War in 1763, the English East India Company had decisively eliminated the French as a serious political and military rival in India. While other European powers like the Portuguese and Dutch remained in their small pockets, the British had established themselves as the dominant European power, paving the way for their eventual conquest of the subcontinent.

• Statement-II is correct. This statement highlights the fundamental structural differences between the English and French East India Companies, which were crucial to the outcome of their rivalry. The English EIC was a private joint-stock company, driven by profit motives and managed by a board responsive to its shareholders. While it received state support, it operated with considerable autonomy and was financially robust due to its vast and profitable trade.

• In contrast, the French Company was a state enterprise, heavily dependent on the French government for grants and subsidies and subject to the whims of state policy. This made it less commercially dynamic, more bureaucratic, and financially vulnerable, especially when the French state was preoccupied with European affairs. The English also possessed a superior navy and held three key ports (Calcutta, Bombay, Madras) compared to the French who primarily had Pondicherry.

• Therefore, Statement-II is the correct and fundamental explanation for the success mentioned in Statement-I.

Solution: A

• Therefore, Statement-II is the correct and fundamental explanation for the success mentioned in Statement-I.

• Question 5 of 5 5. Question Consider the following provisions with respect to the Charter Act of 1833: It re-designated the Governor-General of Bengal as the Governor-General of India, vesting in him all civil and military powers. It completely ended the commercial activities of the East India Company, transforming it into a purely administrative body. It introduced, for the first time, an open competition system for the selection of civil servants, which was extended to Indians. How many of the above statements are correct? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None Correct Solution: B Statement 1 is correct. The Act represented the peak of centralization in British India’s administration. It created the post of ‘Governor-General of India’ (with Lord William Bentinck being the first) and vested in him all civil and military powers. The governors of Bombay and Madras were deprived of their legislative powers, and the Governor-General was given exclusive legislative authority for the entirety of British India. This unified the country’s administration under a single control. Statement 2 is correct. The Charter Act of 1833 brought an end to the East India Company’s life as a commercial body. Its trade links with China and its monopoly on the tea trade (which had been preserved by the 1813 Act) were abolished. The Company was asked to close down its commercial business and was transformed into a purely administrative and political body, holding its Indian territories ‘in trust for His Majesty, his heirs and successors’. Statement 3 is incorrect. The Act of 1833 did contain a clause (Section 87) that stated that no Indian should be debarred from holding any office under the Company based on religion, place of birth, descent, or colour. This was a significant declaration. However, the Act only attempted to introduce a system of open competition for the selection of civil servants. This provision was negated due to opposition from the Company’s Court of Directors. The system of open competition for civil services, which was also thrown open to Indians, was finally introduced by the Charter Act of 1853. Incorrect Solution: B Statement 1 is correct. The Act represented the peak of centralization in British India’s administration. It created the post of ‘Governor-General of India’ (with Lord William Bentinck being the first) and vested in him all civil and military powers. The governors of Bombay and Madras were deprived of their legislative powers, and the Governor-General was given exclusive legislative authority for the entirety of British India. This unified the country’s administration under a single control. Statement 2 is correct. The Charter Act of 1833 brought an end to the East India Company’s life as a commercial body. Its trade links with China and its monopoly on the tea trade (which had been preserved by the 1813 Act) were abolished. The Company was asked to close down its commercial business and was transformed into a purely administrative and political body, holding its Indian territories ‘in trust for His Majesty, his heirs and successors’. Statement 3 is incorrect. The Act of 1833 did contain a clause (Section 87) that stated that no Indian should be debarred from holding any office under the Company based on religion, place of birth, descent, or colour. This was a significant declaration. However, the Act only attempted to introduce a system of open competition for the selection of civil servants. This provision was negated due to opposition from the Company’s Court of Directors. The system of open competition for civil services, which was also thrown open to Indians, was finally introduced by the Charter Act of 1853.

#### 5. Question

Consider the following provisions with respect to the Charter Act of 1833:

• It re-designated the Governor-General of Bengal as the Governor-General of India, vesting in him all civil and military powers.

• It completely ended the commercial activities of the East India Company, transforming it into a purely administrative body.

• It introduced, for the first time, an open competition system for the selection of civil servants, which was extended to Indians.

How many of the above statements are correct?

• (a) Only one

• (b) Only two

• (c) All three

Solution: B

• Statement 1 is correct. The Act represented the peak of centralization in British India’s administration. It created the post of ‘Governor-General of India’ (with Lord William Bentinck being the first) and vested in him all civil and military powers. The governors of Bombay and Madras were deprived of their legislative powers, and the Governor-General was given exclusive legislative authority for the entirety of British India. This unified the country’s administration under a single control.

• Statement 2 is correct. The Charter Act of 1833 brought an end to the East India Company’s life as a commercial body. Its trade links with China and its monopoly on the tea trade (which had been preserved by the 1813 Act) were abolished. The Company was asked to close down its commercial business and was transformed into a purely administrative and political body, holding its Indian territories ‘in trust for His Majesty, his heirs and successors’.

• Statement 3 is incorrect. The Act of 1833 did contain a clause (Section 87) that stated that no Indian should be debarred from holding any office under the Company based on religion, place of birth, descent, or colour. This was a significant declaration. However, the Act only attempted to introduce a system of open competition for the selection of civil servants. This provision was negated due to opposition from the Company’s Court of Directors.

• The system of open competition for civil services, which was also thrown open to Indians, was finally introduced by the Charter Act of 1853.

Solution: B

• The system of open competition for civil services, which was also thrown open to Indians, was finally introduced by the Charter Act of 1853.

Join our Official Telegram Channel HERE for Motivation and Fast Updates

Join our Twitter Channel HERE

Follow our Instagram Channel HERE

Stay Consistent

Consistency is key in UPSC preparation. By making the UPSC Static Quiz a part of your daily routine, you will steadily improve your knowledge base and exam readiness. Join us every day to tackle new questions and make your journey towards UPSC success more structured and effective.