UPSC Static Quiz – History : 1 September 2025

UPSC Static Quiz – History : 1 September 2025 We will post 5 questions daily on static topics mentioned in the UPSC civil services preliminary examination syllabus. Each week will focus on a specific topic from the syllabus, such as History of India and Indian National Movement, Indian and World Geography, and more.We are excited to bring you our daily UPSC Static Quiz, designed to help you prepare for the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination. Each day, we will post 5 questions on static topics mentioned in the UPSC syllabus. This week, we are focusing on Indian and World Geography.

Why Participate in the UPSC Static Quiz?

Participating in daily quizzes helps reinforce your knowledge and identify areas that need improvement. Regular practice will enhance your recall abilities and boost your confidence for the examination. By covering various topics throughout the week, you ensure a comprehensive revision of the syllabus.

#### Quiz-summary

0 of 5 questions completed

Questions:

#### Information

Best of Luck! 🙂

You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.

Quiz is loading...

You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.

You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:

0 of 5 questions answered correctly

Your time:

Time has elapsed

You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)

#### Categories

• Not categorized 0%

• Question 1 of 5 1. Question Which one of the following statements most accurately analyses the primary drivers behind the decline of the Mughal Empire in the early 18th century? (a) The incompetence of the later Mughal emperors was the sole and direct cause of the rapid disintegration of the imperial structure. (b) Aurangzeb's Deccan and religious policies were the foundational causes of the decline, creating a crisis where none previously existed. (c) The decline was a culmination of a long-term systemic crisis in the Jagirdari system, which was critically exacerbated by Aurangzeb's political and military decisions. (d) The invasions of Nadir Shah and Ahmad Shah Abdali were the principal cause, as they destroyed the economic and military core of the otherwise stable empire. Correct Solution: C Option (c) provides the most accurate and comprehensive analysis. The Jagirdari crisis was a deep-seated structural flaw within the Mughal administration. It referred to a situation where the number of nobles (mansabdars) and their salary demands exceeded the available land (jagirs) to be assigned, leading to intense competition, administrative inefficiency, and a functional breakdown between the emperor and the nobility. This crisis was developing even before Aurangzeb but was severely aggravated by his policies. His long and financially ruinous Deccan wars (c. 1681-1707) not only drained the treasury but also necessitated the induction of a large number of Deccan nobles into the mansabdari system, further straining the Jagirdari system. Simultaneously, his alienating religious policies, such as the reimposition of the jizya, turned loyal Rajput houses into foes and fueled rebellions by Marathas, Sikhs, and Jats, which further disrupted revenue collection and administrative stability. Therefore, Aurangzeb’s actions acted as a catalyst upon a pre-existing systemic vulnerability. Incorrect Solution: C Option (c) provides the most accurate and comprehensive analysis. The Jagirdari crisis was a deep-seated structural flaw within the Mughal administration. It referred to a situation where the number of nobles (mansabdars) and their salary demands exceeded the available land (jagirs) to be assigned, leading to intense competition, administrative inefficiency, and a functional breakdown between the emperor and the nobility. This crisis was developing even before Aurangzeb but was severely aggravated by his policies. His long and financially ruinous Deccan wars (c. 1681-1707) not only drained the treasury but also necessitated the induction of a large number of Deccan nobles into the mansabdari system, further straining the Jagirdari system. Simultaneously, his alienating religious policies, such as the reimposition of the jizya, turned loyal Rajput houses into foes and fueled rebellions by Marathas, Sikhs, and Jats, which further disrupted revenue collection and administrative stability. Therefore, Aurangzeb’s actions acted as a catalyst upon a pre-existing systemic vulnerability.

#### 1. Question

Which one of the following statements most accurately analyses the primary drivers behind the decline of the Mughal Empire in the early 18th century?

• (a) The incompetence of the later Mughal emperors was the sole and direct cause of the rapid disintegration of the imperial structure.

• (b) Aurangzeb's Deccan and religious policies were the foundational causes of the decline, creating a crisis where none previously existed.

• (c) The decline was a culmination of a long-term systemic crisis in the Jagirdari system, which was critically exacerbated by Aurangzeb's political and military decisions.

• (d) The invasions of Nadir Shah and Ahmad Shah Abdali were the principal cause, as they destroyed the economic and military core of the otherwise stable empire.

Solution: C

• Option (c) provides the most accurate and comprehensive analysis. The Jagirdari crisis was a deep-seated structural flaw within the Mughal administration. It referred to a situation where the number of nobles (mansabdars) and their salary demands exceeded the available land (jagirs) to be assigned, leading to intense competition, administrative inefficiency, and a functional breakdown between the emperor and the nobility. This crisis was developing even before Aurangzeb but was severely aggravated by his policies.

• His long and financially ruinous Deccan wars (c. 1681-1707) not only drained the treasury but also necessitated the induction of a large number of Deccan nobles into the mansabdari system, further straining the Jagirdari system.

• Simultaneously, his alienating religious policies, such as the reimposition of the jizya, turned loyal Rajput houses into foes and fueled rebellions by Marathas, Sikhs, and Jats, which further disrupted revenue collection and administrative stability. Therefore, Aurangzeb’s actions acted as a catalyst upon a pre-existing systemic vulnerability.

Solution: C

• Question 2 of 5 2. Question Consider the following statements regarding the Carnatic Wars: The First Carnatic War was a direct extension of the War of the Austrian Succession in Europe, with hostilities in India initiated by the British navy capturing French ships. Joseph François Dupleix, the French Governor, pioneered the strategy of intervening in the succession disputes of local Indian rulers to establish European dominance, a method first successfully applied during the Second Carnatic War. The Third Carnatic War was concluded by the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle, which permanently restricted French commercial activities to Pondicherry and Chandernagore. How many of the above statements are correct? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None Correct Solution: B Statement 1 is correct. The First Carnatic War (1746-1748) was a direct spillover of the War of the Austrian Succession (1740-1748) in Europe. The conflict began in the Indian theatre when a British naval squadron under Commodore Barnett arrived on the Coromandel coast and started seizing French vessels, prompting the French to retaliate by capturing Madras. Statement 2 is correct. Joseph Dupleix is widely credited with originating the strategy of using a small, disciplined European army to intervene in the internal political disputes of Indian states. He would support one claimant to a throne against another, and in return for his military support, he would secure significant commercial, territorial, and political concessions. This strategy was the central feature of the Second Carnatic War (1749-1754), where the French and British backed rival candidates for the thrones of Hyderabad and the Carnatic. Statement 3 is incorrect. The Third Carnatic War (1756-1763) was concluded by the Treaty of Paris (1763), not the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle. The Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle (1748) concluded the First Carnatic War. While the Treaty of Paris did restore French factories, it severely curtailed their military power and political ambitions, effectively ending the French challenge to British supremacy in India. Incorrect Solution: B Statement 1 is correct. The First Carnatic War (1746-1748) was a direct spillover of the War of the Austrian Succession (1740-1748) in Europe. The conflict began in the Indian theatre when a British naval squadron under Commodore Barnett arrived on the Coromandel coast and started seizing French vessels, prompting the French to retaliate by capturing Madras. Statement 2 is correct. Joseph Dupleix is widely credited with originating the strategy of using a small, disciplined European army to intervene in the internal political disputes of Indian states. He would support one claimant to a throne against another, and in return for his military support, he would secure significant commercial, territorial, and political concessions. This strategy was the central feature of the Second Carnatic War (1749-1754), where the French and British backed rival candidates for the thrones of Hyderabad and the Carnatic. Statement 3 is incorrect. The Third Carnatic War (1756-1763) was concluded by the Treaty of Paris (1763), not the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle. The Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle (1748) concluded the First Carnatic War. While the Treaty of Paris did restore French factories, it severely curtailed their military power and political ambitions, effectively ending the French challenge to British supremacy in India.

#### 2. Question

Consider the following statements regarding the Carnatic Wars:

• The First Carnatic War was a direct extension of the War of the Austrian Succession in Europe, with hostilities in India initiated by the British navy capturing French ships.

• Joseph François Dupleix, the French Governor, pioneered the strategy of intervening in the succession disputes of local Indian rulers to establish European dominance, a method first successfully applied during the Second Carnatic War.

• The Third Carnatic War was concluded by the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle, which permanently restricted French commercial activities to Pondicherry and Chandernagore.

How many of the above statements are correct?

• (a) Only one

• (b) Only two

• (c) All three

Solution: B

• Statement 1 is correct. The First Carnatic War (1746-1748) was a direct spillover of the War of the Austrian Succession (1740-1748) in Europe. The conflict began in the Indian theatre when a British naval squadron under Commodore Barnett arrived on the Coromandel coast and started seizing French vessels, prompting the French to retaliate by capturing Madras.

• Statement 2 is correct. Joseph Dupleix is widely credited with originating the strategy of using a small, disciplined European army to intervene in the internal political disputes of Indian states. He would support one claimant to a throne against another, and in return for his military support, he would secure significant commercial, territorial, and political concessions. This strategy was the central feature of the Second Carnatic War (1749-1754), where the French and British backed rival candidates for the thrones of Hyderabad and the Carnatic.

• Statement 3 is incorrect. The Third Carnatic War (1756-1763) was concluded by the Treaty of Paris (1763), not the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle. The Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle (1748) concluded the First Carnatic War. While the Treaty of Paris did restore French factories, it severely curtailed their military power and political ambitions, effectively ending the French challenge to British supremacy in India.

Solution: B

• Question 3 of 5 3. Question Match the Land Revenue System with its chief architect/proponent and its fundamental characteristic: Column I (System) Column II (Proponent) Column III (Characteristic) 1. Zamindari System A. Thomas Munro i. Revenue settlement made at the village or estate (Mahal) level. 2. Ryotwari System B. Holt Mackenzie ii. Land revenue was fixed in perpetuity and collected through an intermediary. 3. Mahalwari System C. Lord Cornwallis iii. Direct collection of revenue from the individual cultivator (Ryot) with periodic revision. Select the correct answer code: (a) 1-C-ii, 2-A-iii, 3-B-i (b) 1-A-iii, 2-C-ii, 3-B-i (c) 1-C-ii, 2-B-i, 3-A-iii (d) 1-B-i, 2-A-iii, 3-C-ii Correct Solution: A Zamindari System: This system was introduced by Lord Cornwallis (C) in 1793 through the Permanent Settlement. Its defining feature was that the land revenue was fixed in perpetuity and was collected from the peasants by an intermediary class of Zamindars (ii), who were recognized as proprietors of the land. Thus, 1 matches with C and ii. Ryotwari System: This system was primarily associated with Thomas Munro (A), who, along with Alexander Read, implemented it in the Madras Presidency. Its fundamental characteristic was the elimination of intermediaries and the direct collection of revenue from the individual cultivator or Ryot (iii). The revenue was not fixed permanently but was subject to periodic revision, usually every 20 to 30 years. Thus, 2 matches with A and iii. Mahalwari System: This system was devised by Holt Mackenzie (B) in 1822 and was later popularised by Lord William Bentinck. Its unique feature was that the unit of assessment was the village or estate, known as a ‘Mahal’ (i). The revenue settlement was made with the village community or its headman (lambardar), who was collectively responsible for payment. Like the Ryotwari system, the revenue demand was periodically revised. Thus, 3 matches with B and i. Incorrect Solution: A Zamindari System: This system was introduced by Lord Cornwallis (C) in 1793 through the Permanent Settlement. Its defining feature was that the land revenue was fixed in perpetuity and was collected from the peasants by an intermediary class of Zamindars (ii), who were recognized as proprietors of the land. Thus, 1 matches with C and ii. Ryotwari System: This system was primarily associated with Thomas Munro (A), who, along with Alexander Read, implemented it in the Madras Presidency. Its fundamental characteristic was the elimination of intermediaries and the direct collection of revenue from the individual cultivator or Ryot (iii). The revenue was not fixed permanently but was subject to periodic revision, usually every 20 to 30 years. Thus, 2 matches with A and iii. Mahalwari System: This system was devised by Holt Mackenzie (B) in 1822 and was later popularised by Lord William Bentinck. Its unique feature was that the unit of assessment was the village or estate, known as a ‘Mahal’ (i). The revenue settlement was made with the village community or its headman (lambardar), who was collectively responsible for payment. Like the Ryotwari system, the revenue demand was periodically revised. Thus, 3 matches with B and i.

#### 3. Question

Match the Land Revenue System with its chief architect/proponent and its fundamental characteristic:

Column I (System) | Column II (Proponent) | Column III (Characteristic)

1.Zamindari System | A. Thomas Munro | i. Revenue settlement made at the village or estate (Mahal) level.
2.Ryotwari System | B. Holt Mackenzie | ii. Land revenue was fixed in perpetuity and collected through an intermediary.
3.Mahalwari System | C. Lord Cornwallis | iii. Direct collection of revenue from the individual cultivator (Ryot) with periodic revision.

Select the correct answer code:

• (a) 1-C-ii, 2-A-iii, 3-B-i

• (b) 1-A-iii, 2-C-ii, 3-B-i

• (c) 1-C-ii, 2-B-i, 3-A-iii

• (d) 1-B-i, 2-A-iii, 3-C-ii

Solution: A

• Zamindari System: This system was introduced by Lord Cornwallis (C) in 1793 through the Permanent Settlement. Its defining feature was that the land revenue was fixed in perpetuity and was collected from the peasants by an intermediary class of Zamindars (ii), who were recognized as proprietors of the land. Thus, 1 matches with C and ii.

• Ryotwari System: This system was primarily associated with Thomas Munro (A), who, along with Alexander Read, implemented it in the Madras Presidency. Its fundamental characteristic was the elimination of intermediaries and the direct collection of revenue from the individual cultivator or Ryot (iii). The revenue was not fixed permanently but was subject to periodic revision, usually every 20 to 30 years. Thus, 2 matches with A and iii.

• Mahalwari System: This system was devised by Holt Mackenzie (B) in 1822 and was later popularised by Lord William Bentinck. Its unique feature was that the unit of assessment was the village or estate, known as a ‘Mahal’ (i). The revenue settlement was made with the village community or its headman (lambardar), who was collectively responsible for payment. Like the Ryotwari system, the revenue demand was periodically revised. Thus, 3 matches with B and i.

Solution: A

• Question 4 of 5 4. Question Consider the following statements regarding British trade policy in India during the first half of the 19th century: The Charter Act of 1813 established a policy of reciprocal free trade, allowing Indian textiles duty-free access to British markets in exchange for similar access for British goods in India. The primary objective for the construction of railways in India, initiated in the 1850s, was to foster the growth of an integrated domestic market for indigenous Indian industries. To promote fair competition, the British administration progressively reduced import duties on Indian finished goods entering Britain to match the low tariffs on British goods entering India. How many of the above statements are correct? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None Correct Solution: D Statement 1 is incorrect. The Charter Act of 1813 ended the East India Company’s trade monopoly (except for tea and trade with China) but did not establish reciprocal free trade. It initiated a policy of “one-way free trade”. While British manufactured goods, particularly textiles from Lancashire and Manchester, flooded the Indian market with nominal or no import duties, Indian textiles continued to face prohibitively high tariffs (up to 70-80%) in Britain, effectively destroying their export market. Statement 2 is incorrect. The primary objectives for railway construction were strategic and economic, but they served colonial interests. Railways were built to facilitate the transport of raw materials like cotton from the interior to the ports for export to Britain, to allow for the deep penetration of British manufactured goods into the Indian market, and for the rapid movement of troops to quell rebellions and secure the empire. The development of indigenous industries was not a priority; in fact, the railways hastened their decline by exposing them to machine-made goods. Statement 3 is incorrect. The British policy was the opposite. Throughout the 19th century, Britain maintained protectionist policies at home while forcing a free trade regime on India. The tariff policy was discriminatory; Indian goods faced high import duties in Britain, while British goods entered India virtually duty-free, creating an unequal competition that was a major cause of India’s de-industrialization. Incorrect Solution: D Statement 1 is incorrect. The Charter Act of 1813 ended the East India Company’s trade monopoly (except for tea and trade with China) but did not establish reciprocal free trade. It initiated a policy of “one-way free trade”. While British manufactured goods, particularly textiles from Lancashire and Manchester, flooded the Indian market with nominal or no import duties, Indian textiles continued to face prohibitively high tariffs (up to 70-80%) in Britain, effectively destroying their export market. Statement 2 is incorrect. The primary objectives for railway construction were strategic and economic, but they served colonial interests. Railways were built to facilitate the transport of raw materials like cotton from the interior to the ports for export to Britain, to allow for the deep penetration of British manufactured goods into the Indian market, and for the rapid movement of troops to quell rebellions and secure the empire. The development of indigenous industries was not a priority; in fact, the railways hastened their decline by exposing them to machine-made goods. Statement 3 is incorrect. The British policy was the opposite. Throughout the 19th century, Britain maintained protectionist policies at home while forcing a free trade regime on India. The tariff policy was discriminatory; Indian goods faced high import duties in Britain, while British goods entered India virtually duty-free, creating an unequal competition that was a major cause of India’s de-industrialization.

#### 4. Question

Consider the following statements regarding British trade policy in India during the first half of the 19th century:

• The Charter Act of 1813 established a policy of reciprocal free trade, allowing Indian textiles duty-free access to British markets in exchange for similar access for British goods in India.

• The primary objective for the construction of railways in India, initiated in the 1850s, was to foster the growth of an integrated domestic market for indigenous Indian industries.

• To promote fair competition, the British administration progressively reduced import duties on Indian finished goods entering Britain to match the low tariffs on British goods entering India.

How many of the above statements are correct?

• (a) Only one

• (b) Only two

• (c) All three

Solution: D

• Statement 1 is incorrect. The Charter Act of 1813 ended the East India Company’s trade monopoly (except for tea and trade with China) but did not establish reciprocal free trade. It initiated a policy of “one-way free trade”. While British manufactured goods, particularly textiles from Lancashire and Manchester, flooded the Indian market with nominal or no import duties, Indian textiles continued to face prohibitively high tariffs (up to 70-80%) in Britain, effectively destroying their export market.

• Statement 2 is incorrect. The primary objectives for railway construction were strategic and economic, but they served colonial interests. Railways were built to facilitate the transport of raw materials like cotton from the interior to the ports for export to Britain, to allow for the deep penetration of British manufactured goods into the Indian market, and for the rapid movement of troops to quell rebellions and secure the empire. The development of indigenous industries was not a priority; in fact, the railways hastened their decline by exposing them to machine-made goods.

• Statement 3 is incorrect. The British policy was the opposite. Throughout the 19th century, Britain maintained protectionist policies at home while forcing a free trade regime on India. The tariff policy was discriminatory; Indian goods faced high import duties in Britain, while British goods entered India virtually duty-free, creating an unequal competition that was a major cause of India’s de-industrialization.

Solution: D

• Question 5 of 5 5. Question With reference to Lord Wellesley’s Subsidiary Alliance system, consider the following statements: The Indian ruler who entered the alliance was required to disband his entire army and rely solely on the British subsidiary force for all internal and external security. The allied Indian state was permitted to negotiate with other Indian states independently, provided they did not form alliances with other European powers. The Indian ruler had to accept a British Resident at his court and pay a subsidy for the maintenance of the British contingent, or permanently cede territory in lieu of payment. How many of the above statements are correct? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None Correct Solution: A Statement 1 is incorrect. While the ruler had to maintain a British force and often reduce his own army, he was not always required to disband it entirely. The policy’s primary aim was to make the ruler dependent on the British force, but the complete disbandment of the native army was not a universal or initial condition, though it was a long-term consequence as the state’s finances were drained. The key was the subordination and reduction of the state’s military capacity, not its total immediate elimination. Statement 2 is incorrect. A core condition of the Subsidiary Alliance was the complete surrender of the state’s foreign policy to the British. The ruler was explicitly prohibited from waging war, negotiating, or forming alliances with any other power, Indian or European, without British consent. This clause was central to establishing British paramountcy and isolating Indian states from one another. Statement 3 is correct. Every ruler had to accept the stationing of a British Resident in his capital, who often interfered deeply in internal administration. Furthermore, the ruler was obligated to pay a substantial subsidy for the upkeep of the British troops. If the ruler defaulted on this payment, which frequently happened due to the high costs, they were forced to cede a portion of their territory to the British in perpetuity. This was the primary mechanism through which the British expanded their territories indirectly. Incorrect Solution: A Statement 1 is incorrect. While the ruler had to maintain a British force and often reduce his own army, he was not always required to disband it entirely. The policy’s primary aim was to make the ruler dependent on the British force, but the complete disbandment of the native army was not a universal or initial condition, though it was a long-term consequence as the state’s finances were drained. The key was the subordination and reduction of the state’s military capacity, not its total immediate elimination. Statement 2 is incorrect. A core condition of the Subsidiary Alliance was the complete surrender of the state’s foreign policy to the British. The ruler was explicitly prohibited from waging war, negotiating, or forming alliances with any other power, Indian or European, without British consent. This clause was central to establishing British paramountcy and isolating Indian states from one another. Statement 3 is correct. Every ruler had to accept the stationing of a British Resident in his capital, who often interfered deeply in internal administration. Furthermore, the ruler was obligated to pay a substantial subsidy for the upkeep of the British troops. If the ruler defaulted on this payment, which frequently happened due to the high costs, they were forced to cede a portion of their territory to the British in perpetuity. This was the primary mechanism through which the British expanded their territories indirectly.

#### 5. Question

With reference to Lord Wellesley’s Subsidiary Alliance system, consider the following statements:

• The Indian ruler who entered the alliance was required to disband his entire army and rely solely on the British subsidiary force for all internal and external security.

• The allied Indian state was permitted to negotiate with other Indian states independently, provided they did not form alliances with other European powers.

• The Indian ruler had to accept a British Resident at his court and pay a subsidy for the maintenance of the British contingent, or permanently cede territory in lieu of payment.

How many of the above statements are correct?

• (a) Only one

• (b) Only two

• (c) All three

Solution: A

• Statement 1 is incorrect. While the ruler had to maintain a British force and often reduce his own army, he was not always required to disband it entirely. The policy’s primary aim was to make the ruler dependent on the British force, but the complete disbandment of the native army was not a universal or initial condition, though it was a long-term consequence as the state’s finances were drained. The key was the subordination and reduction of the state’s military capacity, not its total immediate elimination.

• Statement 2 is incorrect. A core condition of the Subsidiary Alliance was the complete surrender of the state’s foreign policy to the British. The ruler was explicitly prohibited from waging war, negotiating, or forming alliances with any other power, Indian or European, without British consent. This clause was central to establishing British paramountcy and isolating Indian states from one another.

• Statement 3 is correct. Every ruler had to accept the stationing of a British Resident in his capital, who often interfered deeply in internal administration. Furthermore, the ruler was obligated to pay a substantial subsidy for the upkeep of the British troops. If the ruler defaulted on this payment, which frequently happened due to the high costs, they were forced to cede a portion of their territory to the British in perpetuity. This was the primary mechanism through which the British expanded their territories indirectly.

Solution: A

Join our Official Telegram Channel HERE for Motivation and Fast Updates

Join our Twitter Channel HERE

Follow our Instagram Channel HERE

Stay Consistent

Consistency is key in UPSC preparation. By making the UPSC Static Quiz a part of your daily routine, you will steadily improve your knowledge base and exam readiness. Join us every day to tackle new questions and make your journey towards UPSC success more structured and effective.