UPSC Insta–DART (Daily Aptitude and Reasoning Test) 28 Oct 2025

Considering the alarming importance of CSAT in UPSC CSE Prelims exam and with enormous requests we received recently, InsightsIAS has started Daily CSAT Test to ensure students practice CSAT Questions on a daily basis. Regular Practice would help one overcome the fear of CSAT too.We are naming this initiative as Insta– DART – Daily Aptitude and Reasoning Test. We hope you will be able to use DART to hit bull’s eye in CSAT paper and comfortably score 100+ even in the most difficult question paper that UPSC can give you in CSP-2021. Your peace of mind after every step of this exam is very important for us.

Looking forward to your enthusiastic participation (both in sending us questions and solving them on daily basis on this portal).

#### Quiz-summary

0 of 5 questions completed

Questions:

#### Information

Best of Luck! 🙂

You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.

Quiz is loading...

You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.

You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:

0 of 5 questions answered correctly

Your time:

Time has elapsed

You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)

#### Categories

• Not categorized 0%

• Question 1 of 5 1. Question The drive for economic growth often places enormous pressure on natural ecosystems. Mining, dam-building, and large-scale industrial projects promise employment and revenue, yet they frequently come at the cost of deforestation, loss of biodiversity, and displacement of communities. At the same time, strict conservation policies that exclude human use can deprive local populations of their traditional livelihoods. Thus, the challenge for developing nations is to reconcile the goals of ecological stability, livelihood security, and economic progress, ensuring that none of these dimensions is ignored in the pursuit of the others. Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage? (a) Conservation of ecosystems should always be prioritized, even at the cost of economic development. (b) Economic growth is more important than the preservation of biodiversity in developing nations. (c) A balanced approach that integrates livelihood security, ecological stability, and development is essential to resolve conflicts. (d) Large-scale industrial projects should be banned in order to prevent environmental degradation. Correct Answer: (c) Explanation: Option (a) is incorrect: The passage does not advocate conservation at any cost; it highlights the risk of excluding livelihoods when conservation is too strict. Option (b) is incorrect: The passage explicitly critiques growth-driven exploitation of ecosystems, so prioritizing growth over ecology is not its message. Option (c) is correct: The passage says the challenge is to “reconcile” ecological stability, livelihoods, and economic progress, which exactly matches this option. Option (d) is incorrect: The author does not suggest banning all projects but calls for balance. Thus, option (c) is the most logical and rational message. Incorrect Answer: (c) Explanation: Option (a) is incorrect: The passage does not advocate conservation at any cost; it highlights the risk of excluding livelihoods when conservation is too strict. Option (b) is incorrect: The passage explicitly critiques growth-driven exploitation of ecosystems, so prioritizing growth over ecology is not its message. Option (c) is correct: The passage says the challenge is to “reconcile” ecological stability, livelihoods, and economic progress, which exactly matches this option. Option (d) is incorrect: The author does not suggest banning all projects but calls for balance. Thus, option (c) is the most logical and rational message.

#### 1. Question

The drive for economic growth often places enormous pressure on natural ecosystems. Mining, dam-building, and large-scale industrial projects promise employment and revenue, yet they frequently come at the cost of deforestation, loss of biodiversity, and displacement of communities. At the same time, strict conservation policies that exclude human use can deprive local populations of their traditional livelihoods. Thus, the challenge for developing nations is to reconcile the goals of ecological stability, livelihood security, and economic progress, ensuring that none of these dimensions is ignored in the pursuit of the others.

Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?

• (a) Conservation of ecosystems should always be prioritized, even at the cost of economic development.

• (b) Economic growth is more important than the preservation of biodiversity in developing nations.

• (c) A balanced approach that integrates livelihood security, ecological stability, and development is essential to resolve conflicts.

• (d) Large-scale industrial projects should be banned in order to prevent environmental degradation.

Answer: (c)

Explanation:

• Option (a) is incorrect: The passage does not advocate conservation at any cost; it highlights the risk of excluding livelihoods when conservation is too strict.

• Option (b) is incorrect: The passage explicitly critiques growth-driven exploitation of ecosystems, so prioritizing growth over ecology is not its message.

• Option (c) is correct: The passage says the challenge is to “reconcile” ecological stability, livelihoods, and economic progress, which exactly matches this option.

• Option (d) is incorrect: The author does not suggest banning all projects but calls for balance. Thus, option (c) is the most logical and rational message.

Answer: (c)

Explanation:

• Option (a) is incorrect: The passage does not advocate conservation at any cost; it highlights the risk of excluding livelihoods when conservation is too strict.

• Option (b) is incorrect: The passage explicitly critiques growth-driven exploitation of ecosystems, so prioritizing growth over ecology is not its message.

• Option (c) is correct: The passage says the challenge is to “reconcile” ecological stability, livelihoods, and economic progress, which exactly matches this option.

• Option (d) is incorrect: The author does not suggest banning all projects but calls for balance. Thus, option (c) is the most logical and rational message.

• Question 2 of 5 2. Question With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made: I. Pursuing development without considering ecological stability leads to long-term social and environmental harm. II. Local communities can be excluded from ecosystems without consequences if governments provide alternative sources of income. Which of the above assumptions is/are valid? (a) I only (b) II only (c) Both I and II (d) Neither I nor II Correct Answer: (a) Explanation: Assumption I is valid: The passage directly mentions that industrial projects cause “deforestation, biodiversity loss, and displacement,” which shows that growth without ecology leads to harm. Assumption II is invalid: The passage critiques strict conservation that excludes communities, noting it can “deprive local populations of livelihoods.” It does not suggest alternatives would automatically solve this issue. Hence, this assumption goes beyond the scope. Therefore, only Assumption I is valid. Incorrect Answer: (a) Explanation: Assumption I is valid: The passage directly mentions that industrial projects cause “deforestation, biodiversity loss, and displacement,” which shows that growth without ecology leads to harm. Assumption II is invalid: The passage critiques strict conservation that excludes communities, noting it can “deprive local populations of livelihoods.” It does not suggest alternatives would automatically solve this issue. Hence, this assumption goes beyond the scope. Therefore, only Assumption I is valid.

#### 2. Question

With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made: I. Pursuing development without considering ecological stability leads to long-term social and environmental harm. II. Local communities can be excluded from ecosystems without consequences if governments provide alternative sources of income.

Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?

• (a) I only

• (b) II only

• (c) Both I and II

• (d) Neither I nor II

Answer: (a)

Explanation:

• Assumption I is valid: The passage directly mentions that industrial projects cause “deforestation, biodiversity loss, and displacement,” which shows that growth without ecology leads to harm.

• Assumption II is invalid: The passage critiques strict conservation that excludes communities, noting it can “deprive local populations of livelihoods.” It does not suggest alternatives would automatically solve this issue. Hence, this assumption goes beyond the scope. Therefore, only Assumption I is valid.

Answer: (a)

Explanation:

• Question 3 of 5 3. Question Imagine two children sitting under the same tree. One has a bag filled with books, the other with bread. Both are essential, but in very different ways. Books may open the mind, but bread keeps the body alive. Societies, too, must constantly balance such choices. Economic growth fills the bag of bread, while justice and equality fill the bag of books. If either bag is ignored for too long, the tree itself—society—may begin to wither. Philosophers often ask: can a nation truly be free if only a few eat bread while others read books they cannot digest? Perhaps the greater challenge is to ensure that everyone has at least a little of both, so that the tree can keep giving shade to all. Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage? (a) A society must balance material well-being with justice and equality to sustain itself. (b) Education is more important than food because it shapes the destiny of nations. (c) Economic growth should always precede justice and equality in developing societies. (d) Philosophical reflection cannot solve practical problems like hunger and inequality. Correct Answer: (a) Explanation: Option (a) is correct: The passage uses the metaphor of bread (material growth) and books (justice/equality), concluding that both are needed to keep society—the tree—alive. Option (b) is incorrect: The passage never prioritizes education over food; it stresses balance. Option (c) is incorrect: The metaphor rejects one-sided growth, noting imbalance causes the tree to wither. Option (d) is incorrect: The passage itself is a philosophical reflection offering a practical insight—that balance is necessary. Thus, (a) best captures the message. Incorrect Answer: (a) Explanation: Option (a) is correct: The passage uses the metaphor of bread (material growth) and books (justice/equality), concluding that both are needed to keep society—the tree—alive. Option (b) is incorrect: The passage never prioritizes education over food; it stresses balance. Option (c) is incorrect: The metaphor rejects one-sided growth, noting imbalance causes the tree to wither. Option (d) is incorrect: The passage itself is a philosophical reflection offering a practical insight—that balance is necessary. Thus, (a) best captures the message.

#### 3. Question

Imagine two children sitting under the same tree. One has a bag filled with books, the other with bread. Both are essential, but in very different ways. Books may open the mind, but bread keeps the body alive. Societies, too, must constantly balance such choices. Economic growth fills the bag of bread, while justice and equality fill the bag of books. If either bag is ignored for too long, the tree itself—society—may begin to wither. Philosophers often ask: can a nation truly be free if only a few eat bread while others read books they cannot digest? Perhaps the greater challenge is to ensure that everyone has at least a little of both, so that the tree can keep giving shade to all.

Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?

• (a) A society must balance material well-being with justice and equality to sustain itself.

• (b) Education is more important than food because it shapes the destiny of nations.

• (c) Economic growth should always precede justice and equality in developing societies.

• (d) Philosophical reflection cannot solve practical problems like hunger and inequality.

Answer: (a)

Explanation:

• Option (a) is correct: The passage uses the metaphor of bread (material growth) and books (justice/equality), concluding that both are needed to keep society—the tree—alive.

• Option (b) is incorrect: The passage never prioritizes education over food; it stresses balance.

• Option (c) is incorrect: The metaphor rejects one-sided growth, noting imbalance causes the tree to wither.

• Option (d) is incorrect: The passage itself is a philosophical reflection offering a practical insight—that balance is necessary.

Thus, (a) best captures the message.

Answer: (a)

Explanation:

• Option (a) is correct: The passage uses the metaphor of bread (material growth) and books (justice/equality), concluding that both are needed to keep society—the tree—alive.

• Option (b) is incorrect: The passage never prioritizes education over food; it stresses balance.

• Option (c) is incorrect: The metaphor rejects one-sided growth, noting imbalance causes the tree to wither.

• Option (d) is incorrect: The passage itself is a philosophical reflection offering a practical insight—that balance is necessary.

Thus, (a) best captures the message.

• Question 4 of 5 4. Question With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made: I. Societies that focus only on economic growth risk undermining their long-term stability. II. Equality and justice are luxuries that can be postponed until material needs are fulfilled. Which of the above assumptions is/are valid? (a) I only (b) II only (c) Both I and II (d) Neither I nor II Correct Answer: (a) Explanation: Assumption I is valid: The passage explicitly warns that ignoring either bread or books (growth vs. justice) will cause the tree (society) to wither. Hence, stability requires balance. Assumption II is invalid: The passage does not view equality and justice as luxuries but as essentials, just like food. The “two bags” metaphor shows both are indispensable. Therefore, only Assumption I is valid → (a). Incorrect Answer: (a) Explanation: Assumption I is valid: The passage explicitly warns that ignoring either bread or books (growth vs. justice) will cause the tree (society) to wither. Hence, stability requires balance. Assumption II is invalid: The passage does not view equality and justice as luxuries but as essentials, just like food. The “two bags” metaphor shows both are indispensable. Therefore, only Assumption I is valid → (a).

#### 4. Question

With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made: I. Societies that focus only on economic growth risk undermining their long-term stability. II. Equality and justice are luxuries that can be postponed until material needs are fulfilled.

Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?

• (a) I only

• (b) II only

• (c) Both I and II

• (d) Neither I nor II

Answer: (a)

Explanation:

• Assumption I is valid: The passage explicitly warns that ignoring either bread or books (growth vs. justice) will cause the tree (society) to wither. Hence, stability requires balance.

• Assumption II is invalid: The passage does not view equality and justice as luxuries but as essentials, just like food. The “two bags” metaphor shows both are indispensable.

Therefore, only Assumption I is valid → (a).

Answer: (a)

Explanation:

• Assumption I is valid: The passage explicitly warns that ignoring either bread or books (growth vs. justice) will cause the tree (society) to wither. Hence, stability requires balance.

• Assumption II is invalid: The passage does not view equality and justice as luxuries but as essentials, just like food. The “two bags” metaphor shows both are indispensable.

Therefore, only Assumption I is valid → (a).

• Question 5 of 5 5. Question If to a proper fraction, the numerator is increased and the denominator is decreased by the same positive quantity (> 0) (and the denominator remains positive), the resulting fraction is (a) Always less than the original fraction (b) Always greater than the original fraction (c) Always equal to the original fraction (d) Such that nothing can be claimed definitely Correct Answer: B Solution: Given that, If the numerator is increased and the denominator is decreased by the same positive quantity Considering fraction 5/7, make (+2, −2) = 7/5 7/5 > 5/7 Hence option (b) is correct Incorrect Answer: B Solution: Given that, If the numerator is increased and the denominator is decreased by the same positive quantity Considering fraction 5/7, make (+2, −2) = 7/5 7/5 > 5/7 Hence option (b) is correct

#### 5. Question

If to a proper fraction, the numerator is increased and the denominator is decreased by the same positive quantity (> 0) (and the denominator remains positive), the resulting fraction is

• (a) Always less than the original fraction

• (b) Always greater than the original fraction

• (c) Always equal to the original fraction

• (d) Such that nothing can be claimed definitely

Answer: B

Solution:

Given that,

If the numerator is increased and the denominator is decreased by the same positive quantity

Considering fraction 5/7, make (+2, −2) = 7/5

Hence option (b) is correct

Answer: B

Solution:

Given that,

If the numerator is increased and the denominator is decreased by the same positive quantity

Considering fraction 5/7, make (+2, −2) = 7/5

Hence option (b) is correct

• Official Facebook Page HERE

• Follow our Twitter Account HERE