UPSC Editorials Quiz : 1 November 2024

Introducing QUED – Questions from Editorials (UPSC Editorials Quiz) , an innovative initiative from InsightsIAS. Considering the significant number of questions in previous UPSC Prelims from editorials, practicing MCQs from this perspective can provide an extra edge. While we cover important editorials separately in our Editorial Section and SECURE Initiative, adding QUED (UPSC Editorials Quiz) to your daily MCQ practice alongside Static Quiz, Current Affairs Quiz, and InstaDART can be crucial for better performance. We recommend utilizing this initiative to enhance your preparation, with 5 MCQs posted daily at 11 am from Monday to Saturday on our website under the QUIZ menu.

#### Quiz-summary

0 of 5 questions completed

Questions:

#### Information

Best of luck! 🙂

You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.

Quiz is loading...

You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.

You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:

0 of 5 questions answered correctly

Your time:

Time has elapsed

You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)

#### Categories

• Not categorized 0%

• Question 1 of 5 1. Question With reference to the findings of the report ‘Relative Economic Performance of Indian States (1960-61 to 2023-24)’, consider the following statements: States with major urban agglomerations tend to attract more private investment due to established markets and infrastructure. Underdeveloped states often fail to attract private investments despite having favourable infrastructure and governance. The diminishing role of the public sector in driving investments post-liberalization has widened economic disparities among Indian states. How many of the statements given above are correct? a) Only one b) Only two c) All three d) None Correct Answer: B Explanation: The report states that metropolitan hubs like Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Bengaluru, and Hyderabad have become magnets for investment, technology, and talent due to their established markets and superior infrastructure. These urban centers attract significant private investment, influencing economic growth positively. Underdeveloped states struggle to attract private investments due to unfavorable infrastructure and weaker governance, not despite having favorable conditions. High perceived risks, poor infrastructure, and governance issues deter private investors from these regions. The report highlights that the diminishing role of the public sector in driving investments, especially after the 1991 liberalization, has exacerbated economic disparities. The shift towards a market-driven economy led to resource allocation favoring already developed states, widening the gap with underdeveloped regions. Therefore, statements 1 and 3 are correct, making option b) Only two the correct answer. Incorrect Answer: B Explanation: The report states that metropolitan hubs like Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Bengaluru, and Hyderabad have become magnets for investment, technology, and talent due to their established markets and superior infrastructure. These urban centers attract significant private investment, influencing economic growth positively. Underdeveloped states struggle to attract private investments due to unfavorable infrastructure and weaker governance, not despite having favorable conditions. High perceived risks, poor infrastructure, and governance issues deter private investors from these regions. The report highlights that the diminishing role of the public sector in driving investments, especially after the 1991 liberalization, has exacerbated economic disparities. The shift towards a market-driven economy led to resource allocation favoring already developed states, widening the gap with underdeveloped regions. Therefore, statements 1 and 3 are correct, making option b) Only two the correct answer.

#### 1. Question

With reference to the findings of the report ‘Relative Economic Performance of Indian States (1960-61 to 2023-24)’, consider the following statements:

• States with major urban agglomerations tend to attract more private investment due to established markets and infrastructure.

• Underdeveloped states often fail to attract private investments despite having favourable infrastructure and governance.

• The diminishing role of the public sector in driving investments post-liberalization has widened economic disparities among Indian states.

How many of the statements given above are correct?

• a) Only one

• b) Only two

• c) All three

Answer: B

Explanation:

• The report states that metropolitan hubs like Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Bengaluru, and Hyderabad have become magnets for investment, technology, and talent due to their established markets and superior infrastructure. These urban centers attract significant private investment, influencing economic growth positively.

• Underdeveloped states struggle to attract private investments due to unfavorable infrastructure and weaker governance, not despite having favorable conditions. High perceived risks, poor infrastructure, and governance issues deter private investors from these regions.

• The report highlights that the diminishing role of the public sector in driving investments, especially after the 1991 liberalization, has exacerbated economic disparities. The shift towards a market-driven economy led to resource allocation favoring already developed states, widening the gap with underdeveloped regions.

Therefore, statements 1 and 3 are correct, making option b) Only two the correct answer.

Answer: B

Explanation:

Therefore, statements 1 and 3 are correct, making option b) Only two the correct answer.

• Question 2 of 5 2. Question With reference to Third-Party Litigation Funding (TPLF) in India, consider the following statements: TPLF can help marginalized communities pursue legal action by providing the necessary financial support. There is currently a comprehensive national regulatory framework governing TPLF in India. One of the concerns about TPLF is that funders may prioritize cases with high monetary returns over those with significant social impact. Which of the statements given above are correct? a) 2 and 3 only b) 1 and 3 only c) 3 only d) 1, 2 and 3 Correct Answer: B Explanation: TPLF can bridge the financial gap for marginalized communities, enabling them to pursue legal action that they might otherwise abandon due to lack of funds. India currently lacks a comprehensive national regulatory framework for TPLF, though some states have amended civil procedure codes to recognize third-party financing. A concern with TPLF is that funders may focus on cases with high profit potential, potentially sidelining cases with significant social importance but lower financial returns. Therefore, statements 1 and 3 are correct. Incorrect Answer: B Explanation: TPLF can bridge the financial gap for marginalized communities, enabling them to pursue legal action that they might otherwise abandon due to lack of funds. India currently lacks a comprehensive national regulatory framework for TPLF, though some states have amended civil procedure codes to recognize third-party financing. A concern with TPLF is that funders may focus on cases with high profit potential, potentially sidelining cases with significant social importance but lower financial returns. Therefore, statements 1 and 3 are correct.

#### 2. Question

With reference to Third-Party Litigation Funding (TPLF) in India, consider the following statements:

• TPLF can help marginalized communities pursue legal action by providing the necessary financial support.

• There is currently a comprehensive national regulatory framework governing TPLF in India.

• One of the concerns about TPLF is that funders may prioritize cases with high monetary returns over those with significant social impact.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

• a) 2 and 3 only

• b) 1 and 3 only

• d) 1, 2 and 3

Answer: B

Explanation:

• TPLF can bridge the financial gap for marginalized communities, enabling them to pursue legal action that they might otherwise abandon due to lack of funds.

• India currently lacks a comprehensive national regulatory framework for TPLF, though some states have amended civil procedure codes to recognize third-party financing.

• A concern with TPLF is that funders may focus on cases with high profit potential, potentially sidelining cases with significant social importance but lower financial returns.

Therefore, statements 1 and 3 are correct.

Answer: B

Explanation:

• TPLF can bridge the financial gap for marginalized communities, enabling them to pursue legal action that they might otherwise abandon due to lack of funds.

• India currently lacks a comprehensive national regulatory framework for TPLF, though some states have amended civil procedure codes to recognize third-party financing.

• A concern with TPLF is that funders may focus on cases with high profit potential, potentially sidelining cases with significant social importance but lower financial returns.

Therefore, statements 1 and 3 are correct.

• Question 3 of 5 3. Question Regarding the regulation and impact of Third-Party Litigation Funding (TPLF), consider the following statements: Implementing TPLF without proper regulation could lead to funders exerting undue influence over legal proceedings. Countries like Hong Kong have established detailed codes to regulate TPLF, which India can learn from. Caps on the profits that funders can earn from TPLF arrangements are unnecessary and could discourage investment. How many of the statements given above are Incorrect? a) Only one b) Only two c) All three d) None Correct Answer: A Explanation: Statement 3 is incorrect here. Statement 1 is correct. Without proper regulation, funders might influence case strategies or decisions, raising ethical concerns about the autonomy of litigants and the integrity of the judicial process. Statement 2 is correct. The passage mentions that countries like Hong Kong have implemented detailed regulations, such as the Code of Practice for Third Party Funding in Arbitration 2019, which India can consider as a model for developing its own framework. Imposing reasonable caps on funders’ profits is necessary to prevent excessive profiteering and ensure that the primary goal of TPLF remains access to justice rather than financial exploitation. Without such caps, funders may prioritize profit over fairness, which could be detrimental to litigants. Incorrect Answer: A Explanation: Statement 3 is incorrect here. Statement 1 is correct. Without proper regulation, funders might influence case strategies or decisions, raising ethical concerns about the autonomy of litigants and the integrity of the judicial process. Statement 2 is correct. The passage mentions that countries like Hong Kong have implemented detailed regulations, such as the Code of Practice for Third Party Funding in Arbitration 2019, which India can consider as a model for developing its own framework. Imposing reasonable caps on funders’ profits is necessary to prevent excessive profiteering and ensure that the primary goal of TPLF remains access to justice rather than financial exploitation. Without such caps, funders may prioritize profit over fairness, which could be detrimental to litigants.

#### 3. Question

Regarding the regulation and impact of Third-Party Litigation Funding (TPLF), consider the following statements:

• Implementing TPLF without proper regulation could lead to funders exerting undue influence over legal proceedings.

• Countries like Hong Kong have established detailed codes to regulate TPLF, which India can learn from.

• Caps on the profits that funders can earn from TPLF arrangements are unnecessary and could discourage investment.

How many of the statements given above are Incorrect?

• a) Only one

• b) Only two

• c) All three

Answer: A

Explanation:

Statement 3 is incorrect here.

• Statement 1 is correct. Without proper regulation, funders might influence case strategies or decisions, raising ethical concerns about the autonomy of litigants and the integrity of the judicial process.

• Statement 2 is correct. The passage mentions that countries like Hong Kong have implemented detailed regulations, such as the Code of Practice for Third Party Funding in Arbitration 2019, which India can consider as a model for developing its own framework.

• Imposing reasonable caps on funders’ profits is necessary to prevent excessive profiteering and ensure that the primary goal of TPLF remains access to justice rather than financial exploitation. Without such caps, funders may prioritize profit over fairness, which could be detrimental to litigants.

Answer: A

Explanation:

Statement 3 is incorrect here.

• Question 4 of 5 4. Question With reference to weather forecasting and ‘Mission Mausam’ in India, consider the following statements: India has installed a sufficient number of Doppler Weather Radars (DWRs) along its western coast to monitor rainfall effectively. ‘Mission Mausam’ aims to improve weather forecasting models by incorporating modern physics and machine learning techniques. Access to real-time weather data in India is currently open and unrestricted, facilitating widespread innovation in localized early warning systems. How many of the statements given above are correct? a) Only one b) Only two c) All three d) None Correct Answer: A Explanation: In India there is significant gaps in radar coverage along India’s western coast, with only five Doppler Weather Radars installed in that region. This insufficient coverage hampers effective rainfall monitoring and short-term forecasting. One of the key objectives of Mission Mausam is to improve weather forecasting models by leveraging modern physics and machine learning to enhance predictive capabilities. In India, while the IMD shares weather data, there are restrictions on the volume and accessibility for researchers and entrepreneurs. This limits the development of localized early warning systems and innovation, unlike in the United States and European Union where weather data is openly available. Therefore, only one statement (Statement 2) is correct. Incorrect Answer: A Explanation: In India there is significant gaps in radar coverage along India’s western coast, with only five Doppler Weather Radars installed in that region. This insufficient coverage hampers effective rainfall monitoring and short-term forecasting. One of the key objectives of Mission Mausam is to improve weather forecasting models by leveraging modern physics and machine learning to enhance predictive capabilities. In India, while the IMD shares weather data, there are restrictions on the volume and accessibility for researchers and entrepreneurs. This limits the development of localized early warning systems and innovation, unlike in the United States and European Union where weather data is openly available. Therefore, only one statement (Statement 2) is correct.

#### 4. Question

With reference to weather forecasting and ‘Mission Mausam’ in India, consider the following statements:

• India has installed a sufficient number of Doppler Weather Radars (DWRs) along its western coast to monitor rainfall effectively.

• ‘Mission Mausam’ aims to improve weather forecasting models by incorporating modern physics and machine learning techniques.

• Access to real-time weather data in India is currently open and unrestricted, facilitating widespread innovation in localized early warning systems.

How many of the statements given above are correct?

• a) Only one

• b) Only two

• c) All three

Answer: A

Explanation:

• In India there is significant gaps in radar coverage along India’s western coast, with only five Doppler Weather Radars installed in that region. This insufficient coverage hampers effective rainfall monitoring and short-term forecasting.

• One of the key objectives of Mission Mausam is to improve weather forecasting models by leveraging modern physics and machine learning to enhance predictive capabilities.

• In India, while the IMD shares weather data, there are restrictions on the volume and accessibility for researchers and entrepreneurs. This limits the development of localized early warning systems and innovation, unlike in the United States and European Union where weather data is openly available.

Therefore, only one statement (Statement 2) is correct.

Answer: A

Explanation:

• One of the key objectives of Mission Mausam is to improve weather forecasting models by leveraging modern physics and machine learning to enhance predictive capabilities.

Therefore, only one statement (Statement 2) is correct.

• Question 5 of 5 5. Question With reference to the electoral processes for Presidents in the United States and India, consider the following statements: Both the U.S. and India use an Electoral College system for the election of their Presidents. In the U.S., electors are selected by popular vote in each state, while in India, electors are Members of Parliament (MPs) and Members of Legislative Assemblies (MLAs). The U.S. Presidential election employs a “winner-takes-all” system in most states, whereas India uses proportional representation with a single transferable vote. Which of the above statements is / are correct? a) 1 only b) 2 and 3 only c) 1,2 &3 Only d) None of the above Correct Answer: C Explanation: Both the United States and India utilize an Electoral College system to elect their Presidents. In the U.S., the Electoral College consists of electors from each state. In India, the Electoral College comprises elected MPs and MLAs. In the U.S., electors are chosen by popular vote during the Presidential elections. Voters in each state cast ballots for a slate of electors pledged to a candidate. In India, the President is elected indirectly by an Electoral College consisting of elected MPs and MLAs; there is no direct public voting for the President. The U.S. uses a “winner-takes-all” system in all states except Maine and Nebraska, where the candidate who wins the popular vote in a state receives all its electoral votes. India employs a system of proportional representation by means of a single transferable vote. This ensures that the value of each MP’s and MLA’s vote varies according to the population they represent, promoting a more proportionate representation. Incorrect Answer: C Explanation: Both the United States and India utilize an Electoral College system to elect their Presidents. In the U.S., the Electoral College consists of electors from each state. In India, the Electoral College comprises elected MPs and MLAs. In the U.S., electors are chosen by popular vote during the Presidential elections. Voters in each state cast ballots for a slate of electors pledged to a candidate. In India, the President is elected indirectly by an Electoral College consisting of elected MPs and MLAs; there is no direct public voting for the President. The U.S. uses a “winner-takes-all” system in all states except Maine and Nebraska, where the candidate who wins the popular vote in a state receives all its electoral votes. India employs a system of proportional representation by means of a single transferable vote. This ensures that the value of each MP’s and MLA’s vote varies according to the population they represent, promoting a more proportionate representation.

#### 5. Question

With reference to the electoral processes for Presidents in the United States and India, consider the following statements:

• Both the U.S. and India use an Electoral College system for the election of their Presidents.

• In the U.S., electors are selected by popular vote in each state, while in India, electors are Members of Parliament (MPs) and Members of Legislative Assemblies (MLAs).

• The U.S. Presidential election employs a “winner-takes-all” system in most states, whereas India uses proportional representation with a single transferable vote.

Which of the above statements is / are correct?

• b) 2 and 3 only

• c) 1,2 &3 Only

• d) None of the above

Answer: C

Explanation:

• Both the United States and India utilize an Electoral College system to elect their Presidents. In the U.S., the Electoral College consists of electors from each state. In India, the Electoral College comprises elected MPs and MLAs.

• In the U.S., electors are chosen by popular vote during the Presidential elections. Voters in each state cast ballots for a slate of electors pledged to a candidate. In India, the President is elected indirectly by an Electoral College consisting of elected MPs and MLAs; there is no direct public voting for the President.

• The U.S. uses a “winner-takes-all” system in all states except Maine and Nebraska, where the candidate who wins the popular vote in a state receives all its electoral votes. India employs a system of proportional representation by means of a single transferable vote. This ensures that the value of each MP’s and MLA’s vote varies according to the population they represent, promoting a more proportionate representation.

Answer: C

Explanation:

Join our Official Telegram Channel HERE for Motivation and Fast Updates

Join our Twitter Channel HERE

Follow our Instagram Channel HERE