UPSC Current Affairs Quiz : 5 March 2026

The Current Affairs Quiz is a daily quiz based on the DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS AND PIB SUMMARY from the previous day, as posted on our website. It covers all relevant news sources and is designed to test your knowledge of current events. Solving these questions will help you retain both concepts and facts relevant to the UPSC IAS civil services exam.

#### Quiz-summary

0 of 10 questions completed

Questions:

#### Information

Best of luck! 🙂

You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.

Quiz is loading...

You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.

You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:

0 of 10 questions answered correctly

Your time:

Time has elapsed

You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)

Average score |

Your score |

#### Categories

• Not categorized 0%

Pos. | Name | Entered on | Points | Result

Table is loading

No data available

| | | |

• Question 1 of 10 1. Question 1 points Consider the following statements regarding the removal of judges in India: The procedure for the removal of a Supreme Court judge is governed by Article 124(4) of the Constitution and the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968. A High Court judge can be removed by the Governor of the respective state on the grounds of proved misbehaviour or incapacity. The administrative control of the High Court over subordinate courts under Article 235 includes the power to take disciplinary action against judicial officers. Which of the above statements are correct? (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 1, 2 and 3 (c) 2 and 3 only (d) 1 and 3 only Correct Solution: D Statement 1 is correct. Article 124(4) provides the constitutional basis, while the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, elaborates on the investigation process for both Supreme Court and High Court judges. Statement 2 is incorrect because High Court judges are removed by the President, not the Governor. The process for removing a High Court judge is the same as that of a Supreme Court judge, requiring a special majority in both Houses of Parliament. Statement 3 is correct. Article 235 vests the High Court with “control” over subordinate courts, which the Supreme Court has interpreted to include disciplinary jurisdiction over judicial officers, ensuring the independence of the lower judiciary from executive interference. This reflects the constitutional mandate under Article 50 to separate the judiciary from the executive. While Article 227 provides the power of superintendence, Article 235 specifically handles administrative and disciplinary control, forming a robust framework for judicial accountability and independence. Incorrect Solution: D Statement 1 is correct. Article 124(4) provides the constitutional basis, while the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, elaborates on the investigation process for both Supreme Court and High Court judges. Statement 2 is incorrect because High Court judges are removed by the President, not the Governor. The process for removing a High Court judge is the same as that of a Supreme Court judge, requiring a special majority in both Houses of Parliament. Statement 3 is correct. Article 235 vests the High Court with “control” over subordinate courts, which the Supreme Court has interpreted to include disciplinary jurisdiction over judicial officers, ensuring the independence of the lower judiciary from executive interference. This reflects the constitutional mandate under Article 50 to separate the judiciary from the executive. While Article 227 provides the power of superintendence, Article 235 specifically handles administrative and disciplinary control, forming a robust framework for judicial accountability and independence.

#### 1. Question

Consider the following statements regarding the removal of judges in India:

• The procedure for the removal of a Supreme Court judge is governed by Article 124(4) of the Constitution and the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968.

• A High Court judge can be removed by the Governor of the respective state on the grounds of proved misbehaviour or incapacity.

• The administrative control of the High Court over subordinate courts under Article 235 includes the power to take disciplinary action against judicial officers.

Which of the above statements are correct?

• (a) 1 and 2 only

• (b) 1, 2 and 3

• (c) 2 and 3 only

• (d) 1 and 3 only

Solution: D

• Statement 1 is correct. Article 124(4) provides the constitutional basis, while the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, elaborates on the investigation process for both Supreme Court and High Court judges.

• Statement 2 is incorrect because High Court judges are removed by the President, not the Governor. The process for removing a High Court judge is the same as that of a Supreme Court judge, requiring a special majority in both Houses of Parliament.

• Statement 3 is correct. Article 235 vests the High Court with “control” over subordinate courts, which the Supreme Court has interpreted to include disciplinary jurisdiction over judicial officers, ensuring the independence of the lower judiciary from executive interference. This reflects the constitutional mandate under Article 50 to separate the judiciary from the executive. While Article 227 provides the power of superintendence, Article 235 specifically handles administrative and disciplinary control, forming a robust framework for judicial accountability and independence.

Solution: D

• Question 2 of 10 2. Question 1 points Consider the following statements: Statement I: The Supreme Court in the Veeraswami case (1991) mandated that no FIR can be registered against a judge of the superior judiciary without the prior sanction of the Chief Justice of India. Statement II: Judicial officers are considered “public servants” under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements? (a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I (b) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I (c) Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect (d) Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct Correct Solution: B Both statements are correct, but Statement II does not explain why Statement I exists. Statement II identifies that judicial officers fall under the ambit of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, as they perform public duties. However, Statement I refers to a specific procedural safeguard created by the judiciary to protect its independence. In the K. Veeraswami v. Union of India case, the court held that to prevent the executive from using the threat of criminal investigation to harass judges, the prior consent of the Chief Justice of India (CJI) is mandatory before registering an FIR or conducting an investigation against a sitting judge of a High Court or the Supreme Court. While they are public servants, their unique role requires this additional layer of protection. The explanation for Statement I is the “independence of the judiciary,” not merely the status of being a public servant. Incorrect Solution: B Both statements are correct, but Statement II does not explain why Statement I exists. Statement II identifies that judicial officers fall under the ambit of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, as they perform public duties. However, Statement I refers to a specific procedural safeguard created by the judiciary to protect its independence. In the K. Veeraswami v. Union of India case, the court held that to prevent the executive from using the threat of criminal investigation to harass judges, the prior consent of the Chief Justice of India (CJI) is mandatory before registering an FIR or conducting an investigation against a sitting judge of a High Court or the Supreme Court. While they are public servants, their unique role requires this additional layer of protection. The explanation for Statement I is the “independence of the judiciary,” not merely the status of being a public servant.

#### 2. Question

Consider the following statements:

Statement I: The Supreme Court in the Veeraswami case (1991) mandated that no FIR can be registered against a judge of the superior judiciary without the prior sanction of the Chief Justice of India.

Statement II: Judicial officers are considered “public servants” under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

• (a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I

• (b) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I

• (c) Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect

• (d) Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct

Solution: B

• Both statements are correct, but Statement II does not explain why Statement I exists.

Statement II identifies that judicial officers fall under the ambit of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, as they perform public duties. However, Statement I refers to a specific procedural safeguard created by the judiciary to protect its independence. In the K. Veeraswami v. Union of India case, the court held that to prevent the executive from using the threat of criminal investigation to harass judges, the prior consent of the Chief Justice of India (CJI) is mandatory before registering an FIR or conducting an investigation against a sitting judge of a High Court or the Supreme Court. While they are public servants, their unique role requires this additional layer of protection. The explanation for Statement I is the “independence of the judiciary,” not merely the status of being a public servant.

Solution: B

• Both statements are correct, but Statement II does not explain why Statement I exists.

• Question 3 of 10 3. Question 1 points With reference to the ‘Shtil’ missile system, consider the following statements: It is a long-range surface-to-air missile system designed for land-based border defense. It utilizes a Vertical Launch System (VLS), allowing for rapid-reaction engagements in multiple directions. The system is an indigenous development by DRDO to replace the aging Russian Buk missile family. How many of the above statements are correct? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None Correct Solution: A Statement 1 is incorrect because Shtil is a medium-range naval surface-to-air missile (SAM) system, not a long-range land-based system. It is specifically designed to protect frontline warships from aerial threats like anti-ship missiles and UAVs. Statement 2 is correct. The use of a Vertical Launch System (VLS) is a key feature, as it enables the missile to be fired quickly without the need to rotate a launcher toward the target, which is critical for 360-degree defense in modern maritime combat. Statement 3 is incorrect because the Shtil system was developed by Russian defense industries (based on the Buk missile family) and is not an indigenous DRDO product. India procures these to strengthen the layered air defense of the Navy, complementing other systems like the Indo-Israeli Barak-8. This acquisition is vital for maintaining security in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR). Incorrect Solution: A Statement 1 is incorrect because Shtil is a medium-range naval surface-to-air missile (SAM) system, not a long-range land-based system. It is specifically designed to protect frontline warships from aerial threats like anti-ship missiles and UAVs. Statement 2 is correct. The use of a Vertical Launch System (VLS) is a key feature, as it enables the missile to be fired quickly without the need to rotate a launcher toward the target, which is critical for 360-degree defense in modern maritime combat. Statement 3 is incorrect because the Shtil system was developed by Russian defense industries (based on the Buk missile family) and is not an indigenous DRDO product. India procures these to strengthen the layered air defense of the Navy, complementing other systems like the Indo-Israeli Barak-8. This acquisition is vital for maintaining security in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR).

#### 3. Question

With reference to the ‘Shtil’ missile system, consider the following statements:

• It is a long-range surface-to-air missile system designed for land-based border defense.

• It utilizes a Vertical Launch System (VLS), allowing for rapid-reaction engagements in multiple directions.

• The system is an indigenous development by DRDO to replace the aging Russian Buk missile family.

How many of the above statements are correct?

• (a) Only one

• (b) Only two

• (c) All three

Solution: A

• Statement 1 is incorrect because Shtil is a medium-range naval surface-to-air missile (SAM) system, not a long-range land-based system. It is specifically designed to protect frontline warships from aerial threats like anti-ship missiles and UAVs.

• Statement 2 is correct. The use of a Vertical Launch System (VLS) is a key feature, as it enables the missile to be fired quickly without the need to rotate a launcher toward the target, which is critical for 360-degree defense in modern maritime combat.

• Statement 3 is incorrect because the Shtil system was developed by Russian defense industries (based on the Buk missile family) and is not an indigenous DRDO product. India procures these to strengthen the layered air defense of the Navy, complementing other systems like the Indo-Israeli Barak-8. This acquisition is vital for maintaining security in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR).

Solution: A

• Question 4 of 10 4. Question 1 points Consider the following statements regarding ‘Operation Sankalp’: It was launched by the Indian Navy specifically to combat the rise of piracy in the Gulf of Guinea. It provides a legal framework for the prosecution of pirates under the Maritime Anti-Piracy Act 2022. It serves as a proactive measure to ensure the safe passage of Indian-flagged merchant vessels through the Strait of Hormuz. How many of the above statements are correct? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None Correct Solution: A Statement 1 is incorrect because Operation Sankalp is focused on the Gulf of Oman, the Strait of Hormuz, and the Gulf of Aden, rather than the Gulf of Guinea (which is off the coast of West Africa). Statement 2 is incorrect. While the operation is supported by the legal backing of the Maritime Anti-Piracy Act 2022, the operation itself is a military/maritime security initiative, not a law or a legal framework. Statement 3 is correct. Launched in 2019, the operation ensures the security of India’s maritime trade, especially oil imports (62% of which pass through this region). It positions the Indian Navy as a “Preferred Security Partner” and “First Responder” in the Indian Ocean Region. The deployment of destroyers and frigates under this mission demonstrates India’s blue-water capability to protect national interests independently amidst escalating regional tensions. Incorrect Solution: A Statement 1 is incorrect because Operation Sankalp is focused on the Gulf of Oman, the Strait of Hormuz, and the Gulf of Aden, rather than the Gulf of Guinea (which is off the coast of West Africa). Statement 2 is incorrect. While the operation is supported by the legal backing of the Maritime Anti-Piracy Act 2022, the operation itself is a military/maritime security initiative, not a law or a legal framework. Statement 3 is correct. Launched in 2019, the operation ensures the security of India’s maritime trade, especially oil imports (62% of which pass through this region). It positions the Indian Navy as a “Preferred Security Partner” and “First Responder” in the Indian Ocean Region. The deployment of destroyers and frigates under this mission demonstrates India’s blue-water capability to protect national interests independently amidst escalating regional tensions.

#### 4. Question

Consider the following statements regarding ‘Operation Sankalp’:

• It was launched by the Indian Navy specifically to combat the rise of piracy in the Gulf of Guinea.

• It provides a legal framework for the prosecution of pirates under the Maritime Anti-Piracy Act 2022.

• It serves as a proactive measure to ensure the safe passage of Indian-flagged merchant vessels through the Strait of Hormuz.

How many of the above statements are correct?

• (a) Only one

• (b) Only two

• (c) All three

Solution: A

• Statement 1 is incorrect because Operation Sankalp is focused on the Gulf of Oman, the Strait of Hormuz, and the Gulf of Aden, rather than the Gulf of Guinea (which is off the coast of West Africa).

• Statement 2 is incorrect. While the operation is supported by the legal backing of the Maritime Anti-Piracy Act 2022, the operation itself is a military/maritime security initiative, not a law or a legal framework.

• Statement 3 is correct. Launched in 2019, the operation ensures the security of India’s maritime trade, especially oil imports (62% of which pass through this region). It positions the Indian Navy as a “Preferred Security Partner” and “First Responder” in the Indian Ocean Region. The deployment of destroyers and frigates under this mission demonstrates India’s blue-water capability to protect national interests independently amidst escalating regional tensions.

Solution: A

• Question 5 of 10 5. Question 1 points Consider the following regarding WTO Ministerial Conference: Statement I: The WTO Ministerial Conference is required to meet at least once every two years. Statement II: The Ministerial Conference is the highest decision-making body of the WTO, established under the Marrakesh Agreement. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements? (a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I (b) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I (c) Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect (d) Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct Correct Solution: B Both statements are correct. Statement II correctly identifies the status and origin of the Ministerial Conference as the supreme body of the WTO, formed after the Marrakesh Agreement replaced GATT. Statement I correctly identifies the mandatory frequency of these meetings as per the WTO Agreement. However, being the “highest decision-making body” is not the reason why it must meet every two years; the biennial frequency is a specific administrative rule to ensure regular multilateral dialogue. For Statement II to explain Statement I, it would need to show a causal link (e.g., “Because it is the highest body, it must meet frequently to resolve urgent trade disputes”). In WTO law, these are two independent factual requirements. The upcoming MC14 in Cameroon (2026) will focus on critical issues like the Appellate Body restoration and food security. Incorrect Solution: B Both statements are correct. Statement II correctly identifies the status and origin of the Ministerial Conference as the supreme body of the WTO, formed after the Marrakesh Agreement replaced GATT. Statement I correctly identifies the mandatory frequency of these meetings as per the WTO Agreement. However, being the “highest decision-making body” is not the reason why it must meet every two years; the biennial frequency is a specific administrative rule to ensure regular multilateral dialogue. For Statement II to explain Statement I, it would need to show a causal link (e.g., “Because it is the highest body, it must meet frequently to resolve urgent trade disputes”). In WTO law, these are two independent factual requirements. The upcoming MC14 in Cameroon (2026) will focus on critical issues like the Appellate Body restoration and food security.

#### 5. Question

Consider the following regarding WTO Ministerial Conference:

Statement I: The WTO Ministerial Conference is required to meet at least once every two years.

Statement II: The Ministerial Conference is the highest decision-making body of the WTO, established under the Marrakesh Agreement.

Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

• (a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I

• (b) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I

• (c) Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect

• (d) Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct

Solution: B

• Both statements are correct. Statement II correctly identifies the status and origin of the Ministerial Conference as the supreme body of the WTO, formed after the Marrakesh Agreement replaced GATT. Statement I correctly identifies the mandatory frequency of these meetings as per the WTO Agreement.

• However, being the “highest decision-making body” is not the reason why it must meet every two years; the biennial frequency is a specific administrative rule to ensure regular multilateral dialogue. For Statement II to explain Statement I, it would need to show a causal link (e.g., “Because it is the highest body, it must meet frequently to resolve urgent trade disputes”).

• In WTO law, these are two independent factual requirements. The upcoming MC14 in Cameroon (2026) will focus on critical issues like the Appellate Body restoration and food security.

Solution: B

• In WTO law, these are two independent factual requirements. The upcoming MC14 in Cameroon (2026) will focus on critical issues like the Appellate Body restoration and food security.

• Question 6 of 10 6. Question 1 points Which of the following outcomes is/are correctly matched with their respective WTO Ministerial Conferences? Bali Package (2013): Agreement on Trade Facilitation and the ‘Peace Clause’ for food security. Nairobi Package (2015): Elimination of agricultural export subsidies. Geneva Package (2022): Landmark deal on curbing harmful fisheries subsidies and a partial TRIPS waiver. Select the correct answer using the code given below: (a) 1 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3 Correct Solution: D All three pairs are correctly matched. MC9 (Bali) was historic for the Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) and the “Peace Clause,” which protects developing nations like India from legal challenges regarding their public stockholding programs for food security. MC10 (Nairobi) saw a major win for developing nations with the commitment to abolish agricultural export subsidies, preventing developed nations from artificially lowering prices. MC12 (Geneva) addressed the global pandemic and environment by agreeing to a TRIPS waiver for COVID-19 vaccines and a fisheries agreement to curb Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) fishing. These conferences represent the evolution of the WTO from the controversial “Singapore Issues” toward a more development-oriented agenda, though structural challenges like the non-functional Appellate Body remain a concern for MC14. Incorrect Solution: D All three pairs are correctly matched. MC9 (Bali) was historic for the Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) and the “Peace Clause,” which protects developing nations like India from legal challenges regarding their public stockholding programs for food security. MC10 (Nairobi) saw a major win for developing nations with the commitment to abolish agricultural export subsidies, preventing developed nations from artificially lowering prices. MC12 (Geneva) addressed the global pandemic and environment by agreeing to a TRIPS waiver for COVID-19 vaccines and a fisheries agreement to curb Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) fishing. These conferences represent the evolution of the WTO from the controversial “Singapore Issues” toward a more development-oriented agenda, though structural challenges like the non-functional Appellate Body remain a concern for MC14.

#### 6. Question

Which of the following outcomes is/are correctly matched with their respective WTO Ministerial Conferences?

• Bali Package (2013): Agreement on Trade Facilitation and the ‘Peace Clause’ for food security.

• Nairobi Package (2015): Elimination of agricultural export subsidies.

• Geneva Package (2022): Landmark deal on curbing harmful fisheries subsidies and a partial TRIPS waiver.

Select the correct answer using the code given below:

• (a) 1 only

• (b) 2 and 3 only

• (c) 1 and 3 only

• (d) 1, 2 and 3

Solution: D

• All three pairs are correctly matched. MC9 (Bali) was historic for the Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) and the “Peace Clause,” which protects developing nations like India from legal challenges regarding their public stockholding programs for food security.

• MC10 (Nairobi) saw a major win for developing nations with the commitment to abolish agricultural export subsidies, preventing developed nations from artificially lowering prices.

• MC12 (Geneva) addressed the global pandemic and environment by agreeing to a TRIPS waiver for COVID-19 vaccines and a fisheries agreement to curb Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) fishing.

These conferences represent the evolution of the WTO from the controversial “Singapore Issues” toward a more development-oriented agenda, though structural challenges like the non-functional Appellate Body remain a concern for MC14.

Solution: D

• MC10 (Nairobi) saw a major win for developing nations with the commitment to abolish agricultural export subsidies, preventing developed nations from artificially lowering prices.

• Question 7 of 10 7. Question 1 points Consider the following statements regarding the geography of Lebanon: It is bordered by Syria to the north and east, and Israel to the south. The Bekaa Valley, a major agricultural region, is situated between the Lebanon and Anti-Lebanon mountain ranges. The country has a long coastline along the Red Sea, facilitating its role as a commercial crossroads. How many of the above statements are incorrect? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None Correct Solution: A Statement 1 is correct. Lebanon shares land borders with only two countries: Syria and Israel. Statement 2 is correct. The Bekaa Valley is a fertile plateau that forms part of the Great Rift Valley system and lies between the two parallel mountain ranges (Mount Lebanon and Anti-Lebanon). Statement 3 is incorrect because Lebanon is located on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean Sea, not the Red Sea. Its coastal plain includes major ancient ports like Beirut and Sidon, which have historically made it a cultural and commercial hub between the Levant and Europe. Incorrect Solution: A Statement 1 is correct. Lebanon shares land borders with only two countries: Syria and Israel. Statement 2 is correct. The Bekaa Valley is a fertile plateau that forms part of the Great Rift Valley system and lies between the two parallel mountain ranges (Mount Lebanon and Anti-Lebanon). Statement 3 is incorrect because Lebanon is located on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean Sea, not the Red Sea. Its coastal plain includes major ancient ports like Beirut and Sidon, which have historically made it a cultural and commercial hub between the Levant and Europe.

#### 7. Question

Consider the following statements regarding the geography of Lebanon:

• It is bordered by Syria to the north and east, and Israel to the south.

• The Bekaa Valley, a major agricultural region, is situated between the Lebanon and Anti-Lebanon mountain ranges.

• The country has a long coastline along the Red Sea, facilitating its role as a commercial crossroads.

How many of the above statements are incorrect?

• (a) Only one

• (b) Only two

• (c) All three

Solution: A

• Statement 1 is correct. Lebanon shares land borders with only two countries: Syria and Israel.

• Statement 2 is correct. The Bekaa Valley is a fertile plateau that forms part of the Great Rift Valley system and lies between the two parallel mountain ranges (Mount Lebanon and Anti-Lebanon).

• Statement 3 is incorrect because Lebanon is located on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean Sea, not the Red Sea. Its coastal plain includes major ancient ports like Beirut and Sidon, which have historically made it a cultural and commercial hub between the Levant and Europe.

Solution: A

• Statement 1 is correct. Lebanon shares land borders with only two countries: Syria and Israel.

• Question 8 of 10 8. Question 1 points With reference to the Indian Judiciary, consider the following statements: Article 50 of the Constitution is a Directive Principle that mandates the separation of the judiciary from the executive. Article 227 grants the High Court the power of superintendence over all courts and tribunals throughout the territories in relation to which it exercises jurisdiction. The procedure for the investigation of judicial misbehaviour is solely mentioned in the Constitution of India. Which of the above statements are correct? (a) 2 and 3 only (b) 1 and 3 only (c) 1 and 2 only (d) 1, 2 and 3 Correct Solution: C Statement 1 is correct. Article 50 (DPSP) directs the State to take steps to separate the judiciary from the executive in the public services, a cornerstone of the rule of law. Statement 2 is correct. Article 227 provides the High Court with the power of superintendence, ensuring subordinate courts act within their legal bounds. Statement 3 is incorrect. While the Constitution (Articles 124 and 217) mentions the “grounds” for removal (proved misbehaviour or incapacity), the detailed procedure for investigation and proof is provided by the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968. The Constitution allows Parliament to regulate this procedure by law. This distinction is crucial: the right to remove is Constitutional, but the process of inquiry is statutory. Incorrect Solution: C Statement 1 is correct. Article 50 (DPSP) directs the State to take steps to separate the judiciary from the executive in the public services, a cornerstone of the rule of law. Statement 2 is correct. Article 227 provides the High Court with the power of superintendence, ensuring subordinate courts act within their legal bounds. Statement 3 is incorrect. While the Constitution (Articles 124 and 217) mentions the “grounds” for removal (proved misbehaviour or incapacity), the detailed procedure for investigation and proof is provided by the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968. The Constitution allows Parliament to regulate this procedure by law. This distinction is crucial: the right to remove is Constitutional, but the process of inquiry is statutory.

#### 8. Question

With reference to the Indian Judiciary, consider the following statements:

• Article 50 of the Constitution is a Directive Principle that mandates the separation of the judiciary from the executive.

• Article 227 grants the High Court the power of superintendence over all courts and tribunals throughout the territories in relation to which it exercises jurisdiction.

• The procedure for the investigation of judicial misbehaviour is solely mentioned in the Constitution of India.

Which of the above statements are correct?

• (a) 2 and 3 only

• (b) 1 and 3 only

• (c) 1 and 2 only

• (d) 1, 2 and 3

Solution: C

• Statement 1 is correct. Article 50 (DPSP) directs the State to take steps to separate the judiciary from the executive in the public services, a cornerstone of the rule of law.

• Statement 2 is correct. Article 227 provides the High Court with the power of superintendence, ensuring subordinate courts act within their legal bounds.

• Statement 3 is incorrect. While the Constitution (Articles 124 and 217) mentions the “grounds” for removal (proved misbehaviour or incapacity), the detailed procedure for investigation and proof is provided by the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968.

• The Constitution allows Parliament to regulate this procedure by law. This distinction is crucial: the right to remove is Constitutional, but the process of inquiry is statutory.

Solution: C

• Statement 1 is correct. Article 50 (DPSP) directs the State to take steps to separate the judiciary from the executive in the public services, a cornerstone of the rule of law.

• Statement 2 is correct. Article 227 provides the High Court with the power of superintendence, ensuring subordinate courts act within their legal bounds.

• The Constitution allows Parliament to regulate this procedure by law. This distinction is crucial: the right to remove is Constitutional, but the process of inquiry is statutory.

• Question 9 of 10 9. Question 1 points Consider the following statements regarding Megalithic culture in South India: The rock-cut chambers were primarily used as primary burial sites for the newly deceased. These structures demonstrate the early use of iron tools for carving hard rock surfaces. The presence of a small circular hole (aperture) at the top of the chambers is a common feature. Which of the statements given above are correct? (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 1 and 3 only (c) 2 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3 Correct Solution: C Statement 1 is incorrect because these chambers were primarily used for secondary burial. In this practice, the body was first decomposed or buried elsewhere, and later the bones were collected and placed in these subterranean laterite chambers. Statement 2 is correct. The ability to carve intricate circular chambers and shafts into laterite rock is evidence of the Megalithic communities’ mastery over iron tools, marking the transition from the Neolithic to the Iron Age. Statement 3 is correct. Many of these finds, including the recent one in Panayal (Kerala), feature a small top aperture (around 5 cm), which archaeologists believe served ritualistic purposes, such as making offerings to the deceased or allowing the spirit to exit. Incorrect Solution: C Statement 1 is incorrect because these chambers were primarily used for secondary burial. In this practice, the body was first decomposed or buried elsewhere, and later the bones were collected and placed in these subterranean laterite chambers. Statement 2 is correct. The ability to carve intricate circular chambers and shafts into laterite rock is evidence of the Megalithic communities’ mastery over iron tools, marking the transition from the Neolithic to the Iron Age. Statement 3 is correct. Many of these finds, including the recent one in Panayal (Kerala), feature a small top aperture (around 5 cm), which archaeologists believe served ritualistic purposes, such as making offerings to the deceased or allowing the spirit to exit.

#### 9. Question

Consider the following statements regarding Megalithic culture in South India:

• The rock-cut chambers were primarily used as primary burial sites for the newly deceased.

• These structures demonstrate the early use of iron tools for carving hard rock surfaces.

• The presence of a small circular hole (aperture) at the top of the chambers is a common feature.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

• (a) 1 and 2 only

• (b) 1 and 3 only

• (c) 2 and 3 only

• (d) 1, 2 and 3

Solution: C

• Statement 1 is incorrect because these chambers were primarily used for secondary burial. In this practice, the body was first decomposed or buried elsewhere, and later the bones were collected and placed in these subterranean laterite chambers.

• Statement 2 is correct. The ability to carve intricate circular chambers and shafts into laterite rock is evidence of the Megalithic communities’ mastery over iron tools, marking the transition from the Neolithic to the Iron Age.

• Statement 3 is correct. Many of these finds, including the recent one in Panayal (Kerala), feature a small top aperture (around 5 cm), which archaeologists believe served ritualistic purposes, such as making offerings to the deceased or allowing the spirit to exit.

Solution: C

• Question 10 of 10 10. Question 1 points In the context of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977, consider the following statements: The Act provides the US President with the authority to regulate international commerce only during a state of war. It was designed to replace and limit the broad powers previously granted under the Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA) of 1917. While it allows for blocking assets and financial transactions, it does not explicitly grant blanket authority for imposing long-term trade tariffs. How many of the above statements are correct? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None Correct Solution: B Statement 1 is incorrect because the IEEPA 1977 allows the President to act during a declared national emergency arising from external threats, which is a broader category than just a formal “state of war.” This flexibility allows the US to respond to terrorism, proliferation, or cyber threats that do not constitute traditional warfare. Statement 2 is correct; the IEEPA was enacted to constrain the executive branch by replacing the more expansive powers of the 1917 Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA), which had been used excessively during peacetime. Statement 3 is correct and highly relevant to recent legal developments. The US Supreme Court recently highlighted that the IEEPA is primarily a sanctions framework. While it grants the President the power to block assets or restrict transactions to protect national security, it does not provide a blanket mandate for trade protectionism or the imposition of long-term tariffs without specific Congressional backing. This highlights the constitutional balance of power between the executive’s role in foreign policy/national security and Congress’s authority over international trade and tariffs. The Act remains a cornerstone of US economic statecraft, allowing for the rapid deployment of sanctions against hostile entities while being subject to judicial review to prevent executive overreach. Incorrect Solution: B Statement 1 is incorrect because the IEEPA 1977 allows the President to act during a declared national emergency arising from external threats, which is a broader category than just a formal “state of war.” This flexibility allows the US to respond to terrorism, proliferation, or cyber threats that do not constitute traditional warfare. Statement 2 is correct; the IEEPA was enacted to constrain the executive branch by replacing the more expansive powers of the 1917 Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA), which had been used excessively during peacetime. Statement 3 is correct and highly relevant to recent legal developments. The US Supreme Court recently highlighted that the IEEPA is primarily a sanctions framework. While it grants the President the power to block assets or restrict transactions to protect national security, it does not provide a blanket mandate for trade protectionism or the imposition of long-term tariffs without specific Congressional backing. This highlights the constitutional balance of power between the executive’s role in foreign policy/national security and Congress’s authority over international trade and tariffs. The Act remains a cornerstone of US economic statecraft, allowing for the rapid deployment of sanctions against hostile entities while being subject to judicial review to prevent executive overreach.

#### 10. Question

In the context of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977, consider the following statements:

• The Act provides the US President with the authority to regulate international commerce only during a state of war.

• It was designed to replace and limit the broad powers previously granted under the Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA) of 1917.

• While it allows for blocking assets and financial transactions, it does not explicitly grant blanket authority for imposing long-term trade tariffs.

How many of the above statements are correct?

• (a) Only one

• (b) Only two

• (c) All three

Solution: B

• Statement 1 is incorrect because the IEEPA 1977 allows the President to act during a declared national emergency arising from external threats, which is a broader category than just a formal “state of war.” This flexibility allows the US to respond to terrorism, proliferation, or cyber threats that do not constitute traditional warfare.

• Statement 2 is correct; the IEEPA was enacted to constrain the executive branch by replacing the more expansive powers of the 1917 Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA), which had been used excessively during peacetime.

• Statement 3 is correct and highly relevant to recent legal developments. The US Supreme Court recently highlighted that the IEEPA is primarily a sanctions framework. While it grants the President the power to block assets or restrict transactions to protect national security, it does not provide a blanket mandate for trade protectionism or the imposition of long-term tariffs without specific Congressional backing. This highlights the constitutional balance of power between the executive’s role in foreign policy/national security and Congress’s authority over international trade and tariffs. The Act remains a cornerstone of US economic statecraft, allowing for the rapid deployment of sanctions against hostile entities while being subject to judicial review to prevent executive overreach.

Solution: B

Join our Official Telegram Channel HERE for Motivation and Fast Updates for

Join our Twitter Channel HERE

Follow our Instagram Channel HERE