“The Supreme Court’s recent judgment condemns stereotypical and derogatory portrayals of differently-abled individuals in media, emphasising accurate representation to prevent discrimination and uphold dignity.” Discuss the measures taken by the State in this context. Suggest reforms.
Kartavya Desk Staff
Topic: Welfare schemes for vulnerable sections of the population.
Topic: Welfare schemes for vulnerable sections of the population.
Q3. “The Supreme Court’s recent judgment condemns stereotypical and derogatory portrayals of differently-abled individuals in media, emphasising accurate representation to prevent discrimination and uphold dignity.” Discuss the measures taken by the State in this context. Suggest reforms. (150 words, 10M)
Difficulty level: Moderate
Reference: The Hindu
Why the question: This question arises from the Supreme Court’s recent judgment addressing the misrepresentation of differently-abled individuals in media and its impact on their dignity and rights. Key Demand of the question: To discuss the measures taken by the State to ensure accurate representation of differently-abled individuals in media and to suggest further reforms to prevent discrimination and uphold their dignity. Directive: Discuss – This requires an overview of the State’s actions and proposed reforms regarding the portrayal of differently-abled individuals in media. Structure of the Answer: Introduction: Introduce the Supreme Court’s judgment, emphasising its focus on preventing stereotypical and derogatory portrayals of differently-abled individuals in media. Body: First part: Measures Taken by the State. Legal Framework: Mention the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, which prohibits discrimination and promotes equality. Guidelines for Media: Discuss guidelines issued by regulatory bodies like the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to ensure respectful and accurate portrayal. Awareness Campaigns: like Accessible India campaign. Second part: Suggested Reforms. Stricter Enforcement, Inclusive Policy Making, Media Training, Public Awareness. Conclusion: Emphasise the need for continuous efforts and reforms to ensure an inclusive and respectful portrayal in media.
Why the question:
This question arises from the Supreme Court’s recent judgment addressing the misrepresentation of differently-abled individuals in media and its impact on their dignity and rights.
Key Demand of the question:
To discuss the measures taken by the State to ensure accurate representation of differently-abled individuals in media and to suggest further reforms to prevent discrimination and uphold their dignity.
Directive:
Discuss – This requires an overview of the State’s actions and proposed reforms regarding the portrayal of differently-abled individuals in media.
Structure of the Answer:
Introduction:
Introduce the Supreme Court’s judgment, emphasising its focus on preventing stereotypical and derogatory portrayals of differently-abled individuals in media.
First part: Measures Taken by the State.
Legal Framework: Mention the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, which prohibits discrimination and promotes equality.
Guidelines for Media: Discuss guidelines issued by regulatory bodies like the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to ensure respectful and accurate portrayal.
Awareness Campaigns: like Accessible India campaign.
Second part: Suggested Reforms.
Stricter Enforcement, Inclusive Policy Making, Media Training, Public Awareness.
Conclusion:
Emphasise the need for continuous efforts and reforms to ensure an inclusive and respectful portrayal in media.