KartavyaDesk
news

The Constitution of India is neither rigid nor flexible, but a synthesis of both. Analyse.

Kartavya Desk Staff

Topic: Indian Constitution: features, amendments.

Topic: Indian Constitution: features, amendments.

Q4. The Constitution of India is neither rigid nor flexible, but a synthesis of both. Analyse. (150 words)

  • *Difficulty level: Moderate
  • Reference: Insights on India*

Why the question: The question is part of the static syllabus of GS-2. Key Demand of the Question: Analyze how the Constitution of India represents a synthesis of rigidity and flexibility. Structure of the Answer: Introduction: Define “rigid” and “flexible” constitutions. Introduce the concept of the Indian Constitution as a synthesis of both. Body: First part: Rigidity Amendment Procedure: Detailed in Article 368, requiring varying levels of approval (simple majority, special majority, or ratification by states). Protection of Fundamental Rights, basic structure. Second part: Flexibility Adaptability: amendments outside the scope of Article 368. Judicial interpretations of Article 21. Parliamentary Powers: Parliament can make laws on various subjects, adjusting to contemporary issues. Conclusion: Emphasize the role of this balance in maintaining stability while accommodating change.

Why the question:

The question is part of the static syllabus of GS-2.

Key Demand of the Question:

Analyze how the Constitution of India represents a synthesis of rigidity and flexibility.

Structure of the Answer:

Introduction:

Define “rigid” and “flexible” constitutions. Introduce the concept of the Indian Constitution as a synthesis of both.

Body:

First part: Rigidity

Amendment Procedure: Detailed in Article 368, requiring varying levels of approval (simple majority, special majority, or ratification by states).

Protection of Fundamental Rights, basic structure.

Second part: Flexibility

Adaptability: amendments outside the scope of Article 368.

Judicial interpretations of Article 21.

Parliamentary Powers: Parliament can make laws on various subjects, adjusting to contemporary issues.

Conclusion:

Emphasize the role of this balance in maintaining stability while accommodating change.

AI-assisted content, editorially reviewed by Kartavya Desk Staff.

About Kartavya Desk Staff

Articles in our archive published before our editorial team was expanded. Legacy content is periodically reviewed and updated by our current editors.

All News