The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) is crucial for ensuring transparency in public administration. Evaluate its role in combating corruption, identify key limitations, and suggest measures for strengthening its institutional framework.
Kartavya Desk Staff
Topic: Statutory, regulatory and various quasi-judicial bodies
Topic: Statutory, regulatory and various quasi-judicial bodies
Q4. The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) is crucial for ensuring transparency in public administration. Evaluate its role in combating corruption, identify key limitations, and suggest measures for strengthening its institutional framework. (15 M)
Difficulty Level: Medium
Reference: InsightsIAS
Why the Question: The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) has been under scrutiny for its limited powers, dependency on other agencies, and delayed action in major corruption cases, making it a relevant topic for public administration and transparency concerns. Key Demand of the Question: The question demands evaluation of the CVC’s role in combating corruption, identification of its limitations, and suggestions to strengthen its institutional framework. Structure of the Answer: Introduction: Briefly introduce the CVC’s establishment, its constitutional status, and its role in ensuring transparency in public administration. Body: Role in Combating Corruption: Highlight key functions like CBI supervision, preventive vigilance, and disciplinary advisory role with brief mention of its impact. Limitations of CVC: Mention structural issues such as lack of independent investigation wing, limited jurisdiction, and non-binding recommendations. Measures for Strengthening: Suggest reforms like establishing an independent investigative arm, expanding jurisdiction, and strengthening whistleblower protection mechanisms. Conclusion: Emphasize the need for greater autonomy, technological integration, and binding powers to ensure the CVC effectively curbs corruption and improves accountability in public administration.
Why the Question: The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) has been under scrutiny for its limited powers, dependency on other agencies, and delayed action in major corruption cases, making it a relevant topic for public administration and transparency concerns.
Key Demand of the Question: The question demands evaluation of the CVC’s role in combating corruption, identification of its limitations, and suggestions to strengthen its institutional framework.
Structure of the Answer:
Introduction: Briefly introduce the CVC’s establishment, its constitutional status, and its role in ensuring transparency in public administration.
• Role in Combating Corruption: Highlight key functions like CBI supervision, preventive vigilance, and disciplinary advisory role with brief mention of its impact.
• Limitations of CVC: Mention structural issues such as lack of independent investigation wing, limited jurisdiction, and non-binding recommendations.
• Measures for Strengthening: Suggest reforms like establishing an independent investigative arm, expanding jurisdiction, and strengthening whistleblower protection mechanisms.
Conclusion: Emphasize the need for greater autonomy, technological integration, and binding powers to ensure the CVC effectively curbs corruption and improves accountability in public administration.