KartavyaDesk
news

“Slow-onset disasters like underground coalfield fires expose the limitations of India’s disaster governance framework”. Evaluate strategies for managing such chronic risks.

Kartavya Desk Staff

Topic: Disaster and disaster management

Topic: Disaster and disaster management

Q6. “Slow-onset disasters like underground coalfield fires expose the limitations of India’s disaster governance framework”. Evaluate strategies for managing such chronic risks. (10 M)

Difficulty Level: Medium

Reference: DTE

Why the question The Jharia coalfield fires and similar slow-onset disasters highlight governance gaps in India’s disaster management system, making it a contemporary and recurring issue. Key Demand of the question You need to critically analyse the limitations of India’s disaster governance framework in handling slow-onset disasters and then evaluate strategies to manage such chronic risks effectively. Structure of the Answer: Introduction Briefly define slow-onset disasters and their hidden but severe impact on people, ecology, and economy. Body Limitations of disaster governance framework – reactive approach, weak institutional coordination, policy vacuum, inadequate resources, community exclusion. Strategies for managing chronic risks – legal reforms, technology-driven monitoring, robust rehabilitation policy, participatory governance, multi-sectoral coordination. Conclusion Emphasise need for anticipatory and rights-based disaster governance to transform chronic risks into opportunities for resilient development.

Why the question The Jharia coalfield fires and similar slow-onset disasters highlight governance gaps in India’s disaster management system, making it a contemporary and recurring issue.

Key Demand of the question You need to critically analyse the limitations of India’s disaster governance framework in handling slow-onset disasters and then evaluate strategies to manage such chronic risks effectively.

Structure of the Answer:

Introduction

Briefly define slow-onset disasters and their hidden but severe impact on people, ecology, and economy.

Limitations of disaster governance framework – reactive approach, weak institutional coordination, policy vacuum, inadequate resources, community exclusion.

Strategies for managing chronic risks – legal reforms, technology-driven monitoring, robust rehabilitation policy, participatory governance, multi-sectoral coordination.

Conclusion

Emphasise need for anticipatory and rights-based disaster governance to transform chronic risks into opportunities for resilient development.

AI-assisted content, editorially reviewed by Kartavya Desk Staff.

About Kartavya Desk Staff

Articles in our archive published before our editorial team was expanded. Legacy content is periodically reviewed and updated by our current editors.

All News