Should the Age of Consent Be Lowered?
Kartavya Desk Staff
Source: TH
Subject: Women and related issues/Vulnerable section
Context: The Supreme Court in January 2026 (State of UP vs Anurudh & Anr.) flagged the misuse of POCSO in consensual adolescent relationships and asked the Union government to consider reforms.
About Should the Age of Consent Be Lowered?
What it is?
• The age of consent is the legally defined age at which a person can validly agree to sexual activity. In India, it is 18 years under POCSO, IPC and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023.
Key trends and data:
• NFHS-4: 39% of Indian girls had their first sexual experience before 18.
• Enfold & Project 39A studies (2016-20): About 25% of POCSO cases involved consensual adolescent relationships, not abuse.
• Rising POCSO cases increasingly reflect parental opposition to teenage relationships rather than criminal exploitation.
Supreme Court Judgment & Current Legal Position:
• Current law: Under POCSO Act 2012, IPC Section 375 and BNS Section 63, any sexual activity with a person under 18 is rape, irrespective of consent.
• Supreme Court (Jan 10, 2026): In State of UP vs Anurudh, the Court acknowledged misuse of POCSO in romantic adolescent cases and urged the government to consider exemptions for genuine teenage relationships.
• Judicial tension: While High Courts (Delhi, Bombay) have called for recognising adolescent autonomy, the Supreme Court has maintained that consent under 18 is legally invalid, though it has sometimes used Article 142 to soften harsh outcomes.
Arguments for lowering or relaxing the age of consent:
• Criminalisation of teenage love: Enfold (2020) found that in 24% of POCSO cases, the girl refused to testify, showing many cases are romantic, not abusive.
• Parental misuse of POCSO: Justice Nagarathna (2025) noted parents file POCSO cases to punish elopement, turning law into a tool of social control.
• Mismatch with social reality: NFHS-4 shows large numbers of adolescents engage in relationships before 18, yet the law treats them as criminal acts.
• International best practice: Countries like the UK and Canada allow consent at 16 with safeguards; India’s rigid 18-year rule is out of step with global norms.
• Judicial overload and injustice: Courts are clogged with teenage romance cases, diverting attention from real child abuse, as seen in rising POCSO pendency.
Arguments against lowering the age:
• High risk of grooming and coercion: A 2007 MWCD study showed over 50% of abusers are known to the child, making “consent” often meaningless.
• Trafficking and child marriage risks: Law Commission Report 283 (2023) warned lowering the age would weaken laws against child marriage and sexual exploitation.
• Bright-line rule protects children: The current 18-year rule creates a clear protective boundary, avoiding subjective judgments about maturity.
• Parliamentary rejection: Parliamentary Committees (2011, 2012) explicitly rejected recognising minor consent, citing child protection concerns.
• Potential legitimisation of abuse: Predators could disguise coercion as consent, especially in cases involving teachers, relatives and caregivers.
Way ahead:
• Close-in-age exemptions (16–18 years): Allow consensual relationships between teenagers with a small age gap while still treating older exploitative partners as criminals, preventing misuse of POCSO against adolescent romance.
• Judicial scrutiny for coercion: Courts should assess power imbalance, grooming, threats or dependency so that genuine relationships are protected but abusive ones are strictly punished.
• Strengthen sex education and counselling: Comprehensive school-based programmes will help adolescents understand consent, boundaries and healthy relationships, reducing risky behaviour and legal conflicts.
• Improve support persons and legal aid: Trained child-support professionals can ensure victims are protected, guided and compensated during long legal processes, preventing trauma and case collapse.
• Uniform Supreme Court guidelines: Clear national rules will prevent conflicting High Court rulings and ensure consistent, fair handling of adolescent POCSO cases across India.
Conclusion:
Lowering the age of consent outright would endanger child protection, but the current blanket rule unjustly criminalises adolescent love. India needs a nuanced, evidence-based reform that distinguishes consensual teenage relationships from exploitation. A close-in-age legal framework offers the best balance between child safety and adolescent autonomy.
Increase in the minimum age of marriage for women to 21 years two years after Bill is notified: Centre