KartavyaDesk
news

“Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely”. Critically analyse how unchecked discretion can lead to ethical lapses in bureaucracy. How can internal vigilance systems be strengthened?

Kartavya Desk Staff

Q7. “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely”. Critically analyse how unchecked discretion can lead to ethical lapses in bureaucracy. How can internal vigilance systems be strengthened? (10 M)

Difficulty Level: Medium

Reference: BS

Why the question: Odisha IAS officer caught accepting ₹10 lakh bribe in Kalahandi district Key Demand of the question: To analyse how unregulated administrative discretion facilitates unethical conduct in bureaucracy, and to suggest institutional reforms for strengthening vigilance and accountability mechanisms. Structure of the Answer: Introduction: Briefly explain how power without ethical restraint or institutional oversight fosters corruption and misuse in governance roles. Body: Unchecked discretion and ethical lapses: Describe how discretionary authority, when not bounded by ethical norms or scrutiny, leads to arbitrariness, coercion, and erosion of public trust in institutions. Need for stronger vigilance systems: Propose measures such as decentralised vigilance units, real-time digital tracking, integrity audits, and protection for whistleblowers to build a proactive and preventive ethical infrastructure. Conclusion: Assert that ethical governance requires more than legal compliance—it demands a culture of integrity backed by institutional vigilance and continuous ethical reinforcement.

Why the question: Odisha IAS officer caught accepting ₹10 lakh bribe in Kalahandi district

Key Demand of the question: To analyse how unregulated administrative discretion facilitates unethical conduct in bureaucracy, and to suggest institutional reforms for strengthening vigilance and accountability mechanisms.

Structure of the Answer:

Introduction: Briefly explain how power without ethical restraint or institutional oversight fosters corruption and misuse in governance roles.

Unchecked discretion and ethical lapses: Describe how discretionary authority, when not bounded by ethical norms or scrutiny, leads to arbitrariness, coercion, and erosion of public trust in institutions.

Need for stronger vigilance systems: Propose measures such as decentralised vigilance units, real-time digital tracking, integrity audits, and protection for whistleblowers to build a proactive and preventive ethical infrastructure.

Conclusion: Assert that ethical governance requires more than legal compliance—it demands a culture of integrity backed by institutional vigilance and continuous ethical reinforcement.

AI-assisted content, editorially reviewed by Kartavya Desk Staff.

About Kartavya Desk Staff

Articles in our archive published before our editorial team was expanded. Legacy content is periodically reviewed and updated by our current editors.

All News